Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Billy Morin

111 words · 6 sentences · 9 clauses

Replying to Grant Jackson (Conservative)
“Madam Speaker, it is a pleasure to be back and a pleasure to see you in the chair. I wonder if my colleague from Edmonton would mind giving his perspective. The member for Winnipeg West just spoke about the lack of consultation with treaty partners. I thought the question was a little bizarre coming from the member for Winnipeg West, given the member from Edmonton’s history as a proud chief of his first nation and his relationship with the federal government and the Crown over the course of his service in that role. I wonder if the member for Edmonton Northwest could give a little bit more clarity for the member from Winnipeg on this topic.”
Statement grade
A+
Average 96 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 90%Reasoning 10%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 80 wordstoday’s discussion primarily revolves around modern treaties, but I actually come from the historic treaties. It is Treaty 6’s 150th anniversary this year.1Partly on point In fact, in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, they have treaty commissioners.2 I understand there was some minimal engagement with the design of those offices, but today those offices do nothing themselves to serve the treaty obligations in terms of meaningful impact. We are seeing historic record numbers of land claims, historic record numbers of lawsuits against the government, Reasoning · 11 wordsbecause of a lack of actual substance in these commissioners’ offices. Claims · 20 wordsI do not see anything different with this one, despite a lot of the work that has gone into it.

Analysed on