Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

François-Philippe Champagne

Liberal on The Economy 2026-09-22

96 words · 7 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Melissa Lantsman (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, it is a day into the session, and there is nothing from the government to fix the affordability crisis on rent, on mortgages and on groceries. This is at a time when Canadians pay more in taxes than they do for bare essentials: Canadians such Olesya, who told me that she is going into credit card debt just to cover rent and food for her family, or Ariella, a student who wonders if she will ever be able to live independently and own a home. Will the government commit today to adopting our Conservative economic plan to save Olesya and Ariella money by lowering debt, taxes and the cost of living for both of them?”

Statement grade

Average 63 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 46%Claims 24%The question 30%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 21 wordswe will take no lessons from the Conservatives. There is no way we will take lessons from them. Canadians know better.PositioningOff pointUnearned certainty Claims · 23 wordsThey know that we have been acting on the price of rent, on the price of food, Vague promiseand on the price of fuel. The question · 29 wordsThe question that people are asking today is whether, instead of using talking points, the Conservatives will do the right thing and support us to suspend the fuel tax.¹ Positioning · 23 wordsThat is what they want to see.Partly on pointUnearned certainty On this side of the House, Canadians know we have their back today and every day.PositioningOff pointVague promise

At a glance

Lost points for
VagueMuch of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.
Echo ×9“We will take no lessons from the Conservatives.” Said 9 times by 4 members.Every time it was said

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 48

5 of 13 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “we will take no lessons from the Conservatives.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “There is no way we will take lessons from them.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Canadians know better.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “That is what they want to see.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “On this side of the House, Canadians know we have their back today and every day.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 55

4 of 13 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Canadians know better.”Praise of the government’s side rather than an answer to the question.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “The question that people are asking today is whether, instead of using talking points, the Conservatives will do the right thing and support us to suspend the fuel tax.”About the affordability issue, but a demand that the Conservatives support the government’s fuel tax measure rather than an answer to the plan asked about.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “That is what they want to see.”Restates the call for Conservatives to support the fuel tax suspension, not an answer to the question asked.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “On this side of the House, Canadians know we have their back today and every day.”Praise of the government’s own side, not a response to the question.

Respect · 100

0 of 13 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 49

4 of 13 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.What the tags mean “Canadians know better”Asserts what all Canadians believe in place of any source or evidence.
A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we have been acting on the price of rent, on the price of food”Claims action on affordability without naming any measure, actor or result that could be checked.
Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.What the tags mean “That is what they want to see”Claims to speak for what people want without any source.
A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we have their back today and every day”An open-ended commitment with no measure, date or success condition.

Echo · 1 repeated line

Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.

“We will take no lessons from the Conservatives.”Said 9 times by 4 members.Every time it was said

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“suspend the fuel tax”The government has moved to suspend the federal fuel tax, via Bill C-38 introduced on September 22, 2026, which extends the temporary suspension of the federal excise tax on gasoline.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20