Replying to Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to finish this discussion with my colleague. Tonight, we are talking about affordability; we are not discussing all the other points he could have raised in his speech. If affordability is important to him, why has he consistently voted against our measures, whether it be tax cuts for the middle class, Canada’s national school food program or all the other measures we have introduced over the last year and a half? Why has he finally decided to support affordability measures this evening when he has been voting against them for the past year and a half?”
Statement grade
–
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little.
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 22 wordsit is because this time the Liberals have not shoved all sorts of other things into the bill to make it unpassable.
