Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Taleeb Noormohamed

Liberal on Building Canada Strong Act 2026-09-24

75 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague from Vancouver Granville for the overview that he gave of Bill C-39, which is extremely important legislation for our country and Canadians during this time. During the member’s summary, he talked about the consultation that took place over the summer. I am wondering if he would be able to elaborate for Canadians listening the type of consultation that has taken place to ensure that we got this bill right.”

Statement grade

Average 91 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 53%Reasoning 47%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 40 wordsthe consultations were widespread, with unions, big and small businesses, indigenous communities and investors, folks who are helping to build this country.¹ Those consultations, whether in small or large groups, were ones that mattered.Partly on point They are reflected in this bill. Reasoning · 35 wordsThat is a really important consideration because as we go through these processes, making sure those voices are heard and the feedback is reflected is a reflection of how this place works and should work.Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 65

2 of 2 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “Those consultations, whether in small or large groups, were ones that mattered.”Asserts the consultations mattered, without describing what they were.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “That is a really important consideration because as we go through these processes, making sure those voices are heard and the feedback is reflected is a reflection of how this place works and should work.”Speaks generally about hearing voices in processes, not about the consultations asked about.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“consultations were widespread, with unions, big and small businesses, indigenous communities and investors”Consultations on Bill C-39 over the summer were widespread and included unions, big and small businesses, indigenous communities and investors.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20