Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Kyle Seeback

97 words · 5 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Madam Speaker, there is no doubt that the bill will ultimately get to committee. We look forward to what the different stakeholders might have to say on the legislation. We look forward to what degree the Conservatives will position themselves on the legislation. I would like to think they would be inclined to support the legislation, or at the very least the principle of the legislation. We will see that at second reading. At the end of the day, it is all about building a stronger and healthier Canada. What we need to do is take advantage of a lot of the work that the Prime Minister and cabinet have been doing over the last 18 months. Whether it is on trade or investments, we are talking about a significant amount of positive change that is coming to Canada. I wonder if the member could provide his thoughts on that.”
Statement grade
B
Average 77 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Aside 24%Claims 10%Procedure 10%The question 56%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Aside · 23 wordsI know this segment is called questions and comments, and that was mostly a comment. I am not sure what the question is, AsideClaims · 10 wordsbecause as I said, we want to study the legislation.Partly on point Procedure · 10 wordsI will turn it into a question for the member: ProcedureThe question · 54 wordsWill the Liberals allow the legislation to be studied? At the member’s next opportunity, will he get up today and tell the House that the Liberals are going to allow as much study on the legislation as necessary to make sure it is fully studied and fully understood? Will the Liberals commit to that?Partly on point

Analysed on