“Mr. Speaker, I am glad my colleague talked about timelines. A Liberal government member spoke earlier in the debate today and talked about the need for diversification of our trade. I think we would all agree, as I certainly do, we need to do that, but that particular member was part of a government that said no to Japan and Germany that wanted our LNG. That would have been an incredible opportunity to diversify our trade. Germany, in fact, went to Qatar, that built them the intake facility in six and a half months. The Netherlands has built an LNG intake facility in six months. Finland has built an LNG intake facility in four months. Why is it that these countries can build a facility in four to six months and we cannot in Canada? Maybe the member can expand on that. It is probably a lot of talk and no—”
Statement grade
C+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 69. The grade is held to 67, 30 above Signal.
67 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 61%Claims 39%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 14 wordsI absolutely agree with my colleague that the time is now.Canadians need results.PositioningClaims · 9 wordsWe do not need another office and bureaucratic process.Positioning · 16 wordsWhat we need is action, commitment to construction, projects moving forward and shovels in the ground.PositioningPartly on pointClaims · 10 wordsCanadians will hold the government to account based on that.Off point
