MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Carol Anstey

Follow by RSS

Anstey pushes to cut federal gas and diesel taxes, speed up approval of mines, pipelines and other resource projects, and see construction start in Newfoundland and Labrador rather than projects only being studied. She fills speeches with greetings and pleasantries, saying “it is always an honour and a pleasure to rise on behalf of the wonderful people of Long Range Mountains,” then answers the question asked without wandering off topic.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A–
88 / 100 over 54 statements
Signal 74 / 100
Relevance 86 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 96 / 100
Averaged over the 54 of 62 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Loses points more than most for

Loses points less than most for A remark off to the side of the point.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.Less often than most members.What the tags mean

Says again and again

Statements 62

Oral Questions ·

Government Appointments

“Appointees usually answer questions at committee. The Liberals gave this job to the Prime Minister's wife, and that role involves 1.2 billion dollars. Canadians have a right to know what her job is and how that money is spent. I want her to appear before the committee.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, having government appointees appear before committee is standard practice. The Liberals made the unusual decision to appoint the Prime Minister’s wife to this role. That should mean more transparency, not less. Lobbyists and special interest groups are celebrating that they have access to the Prime Minister’s wife, and $1.2 billion is not a small amount of money. Canadians deserve to know what her responsibilities are, what authority she has and how their money is being spent. What do the Liberals have to hide by blocking her appearance?

“The Prime Minister's wife was appointed as Canada's ocean envoy, a role tied to 1.2 billion dollars. The government says she works for free, but she still needs to answer for what she does. The minister will not say what resources she uses or if she is raising money. The government blocked us from having her speak to our committee. Why will they not let her come?”
  • A repeated line

    “People are struggling to make ends meet.”

    Said 13 times by 10 members since April 27.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Liberal inflation continues to drive up the cost of living, forcing interest rates up. Canadians are struggling to make ends meet. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister’s wife was just appointed as Canada’s new ocean envoy, with 1.2 billion taxpayer dollars tied to these initiatives. The Liberals say that she is working for free, but unpaid should not mean unaccountable. The minister’s office will not say if she is seeking donations from banks or industry, or what government resources she is using. Conservatives tried to invite her to the fisheries and oceans committee to get answers, but the Liberals blocked it. Why will they not allow her to come to committee?

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“Canada needs to control its spending. When we bring this up, the government asks what we would cut. I want our leader to explain our plan to spend less money.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, oftentimes in the House when we talk about these subjects, the common response we get from the members opposite is, “What would Conservatives cut?” I am curious if the Leader of the Opposition would like to expand on the Conservatives’ exact approach to practising fiscal restraint, which we desperately need in this country right now.

Oral Questions ·

Natural Resources

“A company wants to ship 250,000 barrels of oil a day to Prince Rupert by train, but the tanker ban stops them. The tracks are already there. I want the government to cancel the tanker ban so this project can happen.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister talks about making Canada an energy superpower, yet he continues to stand in the way. Strathcona Resources has a proposal to ship up to 250,000 barrels of Canadian oil a day by rail to Prince Rupert, with exports to overseas markets to begin in as little as two years. The railway already exists. The company is ready to pursue the project. What is missing is to repeal the Liberal tanker ban. Will the Liberals finally get out of the way, remove the tanker ban and allow Strathcona Resources to move forward with this proposal, yes or no?

Government Orders ·

Canadian Fuel Affordability Act

In response to a question from Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault

“More businesses are closing than opening in Canada. Liberal policies are hurting small businesses. Conservatives support this bill because it helps small businesses survive.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 33 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Canadian Federation of Independent Business recently produced a report that talked about the entrepreneurial drought in this country, with more businesses closing than opening. The results are that the Liberal policies are not supporting small and medium-sized businesses. That is not my opinion; that is just the reality. These are the measures that we as Conservatives believe support small and medium-sized businesses, and that is why we are advocating for them.

In response to a question from Ted Falk

“Fishing is very important to Newfoundland and Labrador. High fuel costs hurt fishers by cutting their profits. Because of these costs, they cannot buy new equipment, hire more workers, or grow their businesses.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, yes, the fishing industry is extremely important to Newfoundland and Labrador. The food fishery is another component of Newfoundland and Labrador that is extremely important. These are costs that are directly impacting these operations. Ultimately, that means that fishers cannot hire more people for their operations to expand the fishing industry. They cannot invest in new equipment. It has direct impacts, as it diminishes their profit margins. It also inhibits them from investing and growing their operations and providing more opportunities in a vital and extremely important part of our economy in Newfoundland and Labrador.

In response to a question from John-Paul Danko

“We are not playing games. We are speaking up for Canadians. The federal government can control parts of fuel prices and give people immediate relief right now. We need to do that.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 44 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member opposite is certainly welcome to visit my riding at any time. It is a beautiful riding. What is equally frustrating is when we speak up for Canadians and tell their stories, and then the Liberals tell us we are playing silly partisan games. I find that equally frustrating. There are many components of fuel prices that we can control and that the federal government can offer relief on, and that is exactly what we are talking about. We need to do the things we can do. There are things we can control that would have a direct impact on immediate relief on fuel prices for Canadians. In this current environment, that is extremely important.

“This bill does not do enough to lower fuel prices. It only pauses one fuel tax for a short time, while leaving the GST, clean fuel rules, and the carbon tax in place. Gas prices, groceries, and shipping costs are way up, and small businesses and families in my province are struggling. I want the government to remove all federal taxes on gas and diesel until at least July 2027.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is always an honour and a pleasure to rise on behalf of the wonderful people of Long Range Mountains. I rise today to speak today to Bill C-38. Conservatives will always support measures that leave more money in the pockets of Canadians, but we should also be clear about how we got here. In April Conservatives brought forward a motion calling for federal taxes on gas and diesel to be removed to provide immediate relief to Canadians, but the Liberals voted against it. In May we came back to the House again and called for all federal taxes on gas and diesel to be removed for the remainder of the year, including the GST, and for the clean fuel standard to be permanently removed. That motion was also defeated by the Liberals. After months of Conservative pressure, the government has backed away from ending the excise tax suspension as originally planned, but it is important to note that this would still be only temporary. The tax is scheduled to start coming back early next year. Canadians need lasting relief from fuel costs, and the government’s own announcement on Bill C-38 acknowledges that lower fuel taxes benefit truckers and businesses involved in food, agriculture, housing, construction and delivery, because fuel costs do not stop at the pump. Statistics Canada reported just yesterday that gas prices are up 27.8% compared with a year ago, and increasing transportation costs are up 8.4%. For families who rely on their vehicles and for businesses that depend on fuel every day, those increases had immediate impacts. In September, inflation in Newfoundland and Labrador reached 4.7%, well above the national rate of 3.1%, and higher gas prices contributed to that increase in inflation. I want to talk about the real-life impacts of these extra costs. While in my riding, I spoke with Dwight. Dwight is a small business owner from Deer Lake. His operation employs 30 people. He runs his own company that provides waste management, construction, snow removal and trucking services. His entire operation relies on diesel. I spoke with him about the impacts of rising fuel costs on his business. In 2024, Dwight’s average diesel price was $1.81 a litre. In August 2026, the price was $2.41 a litre. Dwight outlined that the contracts he receives are five to seven years long, and the increase in fuel costs cannot be sustained in those conditions, as his input costs dramatically increase with no ability to recover those costs. In that type of business, with long-term contracts, he has to mitigate those extra costs. As a result, he delays purchases and postpones investments. He runs short-staffed as he tries to absorb these increased costs, which means fewer opportunities for growth and employment in our community. It is also important to understand that our small and medium-sized businesses keep our community initiatives and charitable organizations running. They are the heartbeat of our small communities, and when they are squeezed with rising costs, it ultimately impacts the entire community. More broadly, when it costs more to operate the fishing boat that brings in the catch, more to move groceries to the store, more to run construction equipment and more to deliver goods to communities across this vast country, those costs do not disappear. They make their way all the way through the supply chain, and eventually they show up in the prices families pay. In Newfoundland and Labrador, we understand this better than most, because we are a province of rural, remote and coastal communities. Goods have to travel long distances to reach us, and many people also travel significant distances for work, groceries, medical appointments and everyday necessities. For someone living on the Great Northern Peninsula or in another rural part of my beautiful province, fuel is an essential part of the cost of everyday life. For the people who grow our food, harvest our resources and keep our communities supplied, it is a cost they cannot avoid. Ian, a farmer from Cormack, wrote to my office about the financial pressures facing his business. He is averaging $60,000 to $70,000 per month in direct diesel fuel costs. He cannot sustain those increased input costs, and he cannot pass those costs on. That does not include the indirect costs of feed, fertilizer, other supplies and the transportation of his milk. These increased costs are not sustainable, and temporary relief is not sufficient. If lower fuel taxes provide relief, it does not make any sense to start taking that relief away while families, farmers and businesses are still struggling with the cost of everyday necessities. Families are still paying far more for groceries than they were a few years ago. Statistics Canada says that grocery prices are now 33% higher than they were in September 2020. I hear from seniors in my riding who are watching grocery prices and fuel costs and are wondering how much further their fixed income can stretch. I hear from young families who work, save and do everything they are supposed to but are still finding that the cost of transportation, food, housing, and everyday necessities keeps putting home ownership further out of reach. Small businesses are under the same pressure because they cannot absorb higher operating costs forever. Eventually, those costs mean smaller margins, less money to hire and invest, and higher prices for customers. That pressure is showing up in other ways, too. Food Banks Canada recorded more than 2.1 million visits in a single month last year, nearly double the level seen in 2019. Almost one in five food bank clients reported employment as their main source of income, meaning many people using food banks are working, but they still cannot afford the basics. There is also a job and investment side. Businesses need a clear view of what their costs will be before they decide whether they are going to hire, expand or make a major investment, or as in Dwight’s case, commit to long-term contracts and then face increased input costs that undermine the profitability of his business and jeopardize the livelihoods of his employees. When fuel costs remain high and federal tax policy keeps changing, those decisions become harder to make. Lower fuel costs over a longer period would give businesses more certainty, leave more money available to invest in their operations and help to protect Canadian jobs. Our Conservative proposal would remove all federal taxes on gas and diesel until at least Canada Day 2027 to save Canadians up to 25¢ per litre and bring as much as $1,000 in savings for the average Canadian family. This includes the 7¢ per litre clean fuel regulations, the GST and removing the federal industrial carbon tax so that Canadians are not forced to pay more for food and fuel. Bill C-38 does not address the full cost that federal policies add to fuel. The GST remains, the clean fuel regulations remain and the federal industrial carbon tax continues to add costs throughout the supply chain. A temporary suspension of one tax does not address all these costs. Canadians need relief that lasts longer than a few months and lowers the overall cost of fuel. There is also a broader question here about Canadian energy security. Canada is one of the largest energy-producing countries in the world, yet parts of our country remain dependent on imported refined petroleum products. This is important, because when global supply chains are disrupted, when shipping routes are threatened or when decisions made in another country can affect the price and availability of fuel here at home, Canada should not have to wait for the next international crisis before thinking seriously about its own fuel security. We should be producing, refining, storing and transporting more of the energy we need here at home. That means attracting private investment, getting infrastructure built and making sure Canada can compete for projects and investment with other countries. For Newfoundland and Labrador, this is an enormous opportunity. Our province has major energy resources, skilled workers, strong marine infrastructure and communities with generations of experience in resource development. Yet, for generations, too many Newfoundlanders and Labradorians have had to leave home to find work elsewhere. For me, that is one of the most important parts of this debate. For a tradesperson in Newfoundland and Labrador, more investment can mean finding work close to home instead of spending weeks or months away from their family. For a young person, it can mean learning a trade or earning a degree and still being able to build a career in the community where they grew up. For local businesses, more investment and more jobs mean more customers and stronger communities. For Newfoundland and Labrador, investment certainty is very important. When companies decide where to invest, they look at their operating costs, the regulatory environment and whether a project has a reasonable chance of moving forward. If Canada is more expensive and less predictable than competing jurisdictions, investment goes elsewhere and workers are the ones who lose out on those opportunities. Temporary tax relief does not solve the bigger problem if Liberal policies continue to make it difficult to build the infrastructure needed to strengthen our own fuel supply. That means creating a more competitive environment for investment, getting projects approved faster and making it easier to build and transport in Canada. For Newfoundland and Labrador, that is where the real opportunity lies. Conservatives are calling for broader relief, and we will continue pushing for it by pushing to remove the remaining federal taxes and costs that make gas and diesel more expensive while also pushing to make Canada a better place to invest. Families in Newfoundland and Labrador do not need another announcement telling them relief is coming. They need to see the difference when they fill their vehicles, buy their groceries, heat their homes and pay their bills. That is what Conservatives will continue to fight for.

“High diesel prices hurt small businesses in my riding. I want my colleague to talk more about how diesel costs affect businesses.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I can certainly relate to many of the things my colleague talked about with respect to things he hears from Canadians, including people in his riding. We are talking about relief at the pumps. I also talked to a lot of small and medium-sized business owners in the beautiful riding I represent, and they are also talking about the impact that increased diesel prices have on their operations. I am wondering if this is something my colleague also experiences, and whether he would like to expand specifically on that aspect of the increased cost of diesel.

Oral Questions ·

Taxation

“Canadians pay more for diesel than Americans and the rest of the world because of federal taxes and rules. I want the government to support our plan to cut diesel taxes and make it easier for Canada to produce and move its own fuel.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, if those programs were working, residents from her constituency would not be reaching out to me asking me— Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Carol Anstey: Mr. Speaker, Canadians are paying roughly 24¢ per litre more for diesel than Americans and 31¢ more than the global average. The government cannot control conflicts overseas, but it can certainly control taxes and barriers that it imposes here at home. Will the members opposite support our Conservative plan to cut diesel taxes and remove the barriers preventing Canada from producing, refining and transporting more of its own fuel?

“High diesel prices are making groceries cost more. I want the minister to support our plan to remove all federal taxes on diesel until at least July 2027.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, how out of touch was that? Diesel in Deer Lake has reached $2.77 a litre. Michelle, a farmer in Cormack, expects her diesel bill to reach a staggering $135,000 this year, up nearly 56% since 2024. Diesel costs for farmers, fishermen and truckers mean higher grocery bills for Newfoundland and Labrador families. Will the energy minister support our Conservative emergency fuel relief plan, which would eliminate federal taxes on diesel until at least Canada Day 2027 and provide real relief for Canadians and farmers like Michelle?

Statements by Members ·

Stephenville International Airport

“Stephenville International Airport is reopening. This is good for western Newfoundland. The airport will bring investment, support local resources, and create good jobs. I congratulate everyone who helped make this happen.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the reopening of Stephenville International Airport marks an important step toward greater opportunity for the residents of western Newfoundland. Newfoundland and Labrador has the resources, skilled workers and determination to build a prosperous future. Strong transportation infrastructure serves to transform those advantages into real opportunities for businesses and families. With its 10,000-foot runway and established aviation infrastructure, Stephenville airport has the potential to attract good investments, support resource development and create good-paying jobs. The airport’s history as Ernest Harmon Air Force Base gave Stephenville a strategic role in North Atlantic defence, with the base serving as a vital link between North America and Europe and for transatlantic crossings. This rich and proud aviation legacy is the foundation to build an ambitious and prosperous future, and this reopening is a tremendous opportunity. I congratulate everyone whose determination made this reopening possible. Their efforts are helping create opportunities for people to work, raise their families and build their futures at home.

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“Can my colleague explain how the cost of diesel affects farmers and their farms?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I wonder if my colleague could articulate the direct, but also the indirect, costs to farmers of diesel and what that means to their farms. I know he knows the space very well.

In response to a question from Tamara Kronis

“People in my riding live far apart in rural areas and have to drive long distances to see a doctor or buy goods. They have no other way to get around. That is why they need cheaper fuel.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there are vast distances between the communities in Long Range Mountains, just as there is in the member’s riding, where places are rural and remote. In order for people to get to their medical appointments or get the goods and services they need, they have to travel long distances and have no alternatives. That is why this is especially important for the constituents we represent.

In response to a question from Kevin Lamoureux

“I fight for the people in my riding and across Canada. The Liberals only cut gas taxes because Conservatives pressured them to do it. We take credit for that, and we will keep fighting for Canadians.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I do not think there is any misunderstanding about how much I advocate for the people in my riding and in this country. I find it a bit rich that the member opposite gets up and attacks me for fighting and advocating for Canadians. If we had not put the pressure on, absolutely the Liberals would not have cut the taxes on gas. Yes, we will take credit, and yes, we will continue to fight for Canadians.

In response to a question from Rob Morrison

“We need to cut all fuel taxes right now to help farmers. Their diesel costs are up 48% over the last two years, and they cannot afford it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I can certainly relate to those stories because I have farmers reaching out to me consistently, all the time. It would provide immediate relief if we eliminated all those taxes right now. They desperately need it. As I talked about in my speech today, when our farmers are paying a 48% increase from just two years ago on diesel, which is so much a part of their operations’ direct and indirect costs, they cannot sustain higher input costs. They are in real trouble and facing real risks. We are fighting for our farmers and want to provide immediate relief to them because we know they are struggling right now.

In response to a question from Marilyn Gladu

“The Liberals only take half measures on our ideas. They should support our motion to give Canadians real relief from high costs.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, oftentimes, the Liberals like to take Conservative ideas and go part of the way, but they do not want to go all the way. I would suggest that they approve of our opposition day motion so we can provide real relief for Canadians. Instead of taking half measures on Conservative ideas, I would encourage them to support our opposition day motion, if they are really serious about the affordability crisis in this country.

“I want the government to adopt our plan to lower diesel prices. Canadians pay much more for diesel than other countries because of federal taxes and rules that hurt energy projects. We need to cut taxes on diesel and produce more fuel here in Canada to lower everyday costs.”
  • A repeated line

    “Including the industrial carbon tax and the clean fuel standard.”

    Said 10 times by 9 members since April 28.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

moved: That, given that, (i) Canada’s diesel prices have hit record highs over the last several weeks, (ii) Canada’s diesel prices on September 28 were approximately 24 cents per litre higher than the United States average, and 31 cents a litre higher than the world average, showing that high prices cannot be explained by global factors alone, (iii) diesel powers the tractors that farm our food, and the trucks and trains that transport it, leading to bigger grocery bills for working Canadians, (iv) Canadians pay more than other countries for diesel because of high taxes, a low dollar and too much reliance on U.S. refineries, (v) Canada should have the most affordable diesel in the world, given that we have the fourth biggest oil reserves, the House, in the interest of saving Canadians money and fuelling our country at home, call on the government to adopt the Emergency Fuel Relief Plan that: (a) provides for emergency pre-permitting and tax relief for the construction of diesel infrastructure, such as refineries, pipelines, rail and storage; (b) eliminates all taxes on diesel consumption until at least Canada Day; and (c) permanently eliminates taxes on diesel production; and call on the government to set the goal of boosting Canadian diesel production to one million barrels per day, allowing every Canadian business and consumer access to Canadian diesel. She said: Mr. Speaker, I will be splitting my time today with my colleague and friend from Bow River. I rise today to speak to our Conservative opposition motion calling for an emergency fuel relief plan to cut diesel costs, increase Canadian fuel production and strengthen our ability to fuel ourselves at home. Across Canada, diesel keeps our economy moving. It powers the trucks that deliver groceries to our stores, the equipment farmers use to bring in the harvest, the fishing vessels on our coasts, forestry and mining operations, construction equipment and essential services in rural and northern communities. When diesel costs more, everything that depends on it costs more too. Families feel it in the price of groceries, building materials, transportation and everyday essentials. Canada’s geography makes these pressures even harder. Goods must travel long distances to reach rural communities. Residents often travel long distances for work, groceries and medical appointments. Higher fuel costs follow them throughout their daily lives and make almost everything more expensive. Higher fuel costs are not just a problem for the person standing at the pump. They show up in the cost of producing food, moving freight, building homes and keeping businesses open. In rural, northern and remote communities, those costs can be even harder to absorb. Many Canadians have no practical alternative to driving long distances, and businesses have no alternative to moving goods across our sprawling, vast geography. The national Canadian average of diesel was roughly $2.63 a litre, up roughly 38% in just three months. A week prior, it reached $2.74 a litre. In my riding, diesel in Deer Lake reached $2.77 a litre. There is no question that events overseas have contributed to higher fuel prices. Conflicts involving Iran and Ukraine have disrupted energy markets and put pressure on fuel supplies around the world. Those pressures are being felt around the world, yet they do not explain why Canadians are paying approximately 24¢ more per litre for diesel than Americans and 31¢ more than the world average. For fishermen filling their boats, farmers running their equipment and truckers delivering our groceries, that premium adds up, and those higher costs are ultimately passed on to families. Canada cannot control conflicts overseas, but we can control the taxes, regulations and barriers here at home that add to the cost of producing and supplying fuel in Canada. International markets affect everyone, but Canadians should not be paying an additional premium created by taxes and barriers that the Liberals imposed on Canada. From farmers on the Prairies, forestry workers in British Columbia and northern Ontario and truckers moving goods across Quebec to fishermen in Atlantic Canada and workers supplying remote communities in the north, affordable and reliable diesel is important in every area of this beautiful country. Canada’s energy policy must reflect what it takes to live, work and do business across a country as large and diverse as Canada. Fuel costs do not stop at the pump. They move through the supply chain and into the price of food, building materials and everyday necessities. A single piece of harvesting equipment can consume more than 1,100 dollars’ worth of diesel in a day. During harvest, those costs hit farmers especially hard. The Grain Growers of Canada estimates that fuel for one large machine could cost $15,000 more this harvest than last year. That is before counting other equipment. I see the impact of those costs in my own riding of Long Range Mountains. Michelle, a farmer from Cormack, wrote to my office about what those costs look like on the ground. In 2024, her farm spent $86,543 on diesel. This year, she expects that this cost will reach approximately $135,000. That is an increase of nearly 56% in just two years. That is only what her farm spends directly on fuel to keep its tractors and equipment running. Michelle explained that diesel is needed for everyday work, like preparing feed for their cows and cleaning the barns. It is also needed to spread manure and fertilizer; mow, bale and haul hay; and clear snow during the winter. On top of that, her farm pays higher freight charges and fuel surcharges on feed, fertilizer, supplies and equipment parts, as well as the cost of transporting the milk. As Michelle explained to me, rising fuel prices at this level are simply not sustainable for farms. For farmers like Michelle, diesel is essential and not an option. If the equipment does not run, the farm cannot operate, and if the truck does not move, she cannot transport her product. These pressures extend across our economy. Diesel powers construction equipment, mining and forestry operations, and the trucks and trains that move goods across the country. Higher operating costs ultimately add to household bills. This is why Canada’s energy security matters just as much as immediate relief at the pump. Threats from Washington to restrict diesel exports to Canada further underline the urgent need to strengthen our domestic refining, transportation, storage and supply. Whether that threat materializes or not, Canada needs to prepare before a disruption reaches our communities. We should not wait for the next supply disruption before asking whether Canada has enough refining capacity or whether we can move Canadian fuel when it is needed. A country with our energy resources should have the infrastructure and capacity to better protect Canadians before a crisis happens. Canada has the world’s fourth-largest crude oil reserves, yet parts of Canada remain heavily dependent on imported refined petroleum products, much of them coming from the United States. In 2025, Canada imported approximately 485,000 barrels per day of refined petroleum products. Nearly 80% of those imports came from the United States. For a country with our resources, workers and expertise, we should be doing more to produce and refine the fuel Canadians need here at home. For 11 years, Liberal antidevelopment laws like Bill C-69 and Bill C-48 have discouraged private investment and held back energy development. Instead of making it easier to build the infrastructure needed to move Canadian energy across Canada, Liberal federal policy has too often added another layer of uncertainty. Companies considering major investments need certainty. They need to know that projects can move through the approval process within reasonable timelines and that Canada is a competitive place to build and expand operations. Canada cannot become more self-reliant on fuel while continuing to impose barriers that make energy infrastructure harder and more expensive to build. The Liberal government knows that cutting taxes saves Canadians money. It needs to stop making excuses and implement our Conservative emergency fuel plan relief to cut diesel costs, build Canadian energy and put more money back in Canadians’ pockets. The Conservative plan is straightforward: lower costs now, increase Canadian fuel production and make Canada more resilient. Our motion calls on the government to take concrete measures to provide immediate relief, while increasing Canada’s ability to produce, refine and distribute the fuel Canadians depend upon. We should eliminate all federal taxes on diesel sales until at least Canada Day 2027 to give households and businesses relief that they can count on. That means removing federal taxes on diesel consumption, including the GST, so that farmers, truckers, fishermen and businesses can reduce their input costs and continue to provide Canadians with the food and goods and services that they rely upon. We should permanently eliminate federal taxes on diesel production, including the industrial carbon tax and the clean fuel standard, so that federal policy encourages affordable Canadian fuel production. We should increase Canadian diesel and other refined fuel production to one million barrels per day within five years, with the goal of meeting demand across Canada and eliminating the diesel price gap with the United States. We should create emergency permitting for diesel refineries, storage, and transportation infrastructure so that fuel can reach the people and businesses that depend upon it. That includes the pipelines, rail infrastructure and storage facilities needed to move fuel reliably between regions and get it to market. We should allow businesses to deduct 100% of investments in diesel production and distribution in the first year to encourage private investment in the capacity that Canada needs. If Canada wants new refineries, refinery expansion, storage facilities and transportation infrastructure, our tax and regulatory environment has to make Canada a competitive place to put that capital. We should also build a strategic refined petroleum reserve to protect Canadians during supply disruptions. Our plan would provide relief today while strengthening our ability to fuel ourselves here at home. More Canadian fuel, better transportation infrastructure and emergency supplies would put us in a stronger position to meet our needs and supply our allies. These measures provide Canadians the relief they need from higher costs, but they also empower us to produce more of the fuel we consume and move it reliably wherever it is needed. Canada cannot control every event in Washington or disruption in global markets, but we can control whether we make it easier or harder to produce and refine fuel here at home. Members of this House should consider the impact that higher diesel costs are having on Canadians in every region in this country. I encourage members from all parties to support this motion and help build a stronger, more affordable and more resilient Canada.

Government Orders ·

Building Canada Strong Act

In response to a question from Dan Muys

“Canadians need results right now, not more paperwork and government offices. We need the government to actually start building these projects.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 38 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 37 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I absolutely agree with my colleague that the time is now. Canadians need results. We do not need another office and bureaucratic process. What we need is action, commitment to construction, projects moving forward and shovels in the ground. Canadians will hold the government to account based on that.

In response to a question from Marie-Hélène Gaudreau

“We need more time to study this massive bill, especially the changes to labour laws. The government is rushing it through committees, so we cannot properly look at how it will affect people.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I alluded to in my speech, specifically around the changes to labour laws, one of the concerns I certainly heard from constituents in my riding is that this is being put in this massive piece of legislation and being pushed through in majority committees. There will not be time to talk properly about the repercussions for people who will be impacted by this piece of legislation. I would agree with the member that we need to have that time, especially on that piece of legislation.