Analysis · Debate reply · beta

David Bexte

Conservative on Business of Supply 2026-10-06

88 words · 7 sentences · 9 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, I am wondering if the member can then provide clarification. Based on that question and his answer, is the Conservative Party of Canada’s position that there should be no form of taxation on diesel or gasoline?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 96 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Thanks 12%Reasoning 88%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 11 wordsthat is an interesting question from the member across the way.Thanks Reasoning · 77 wordsShould there be no taxation? In an ideal world, there would be none at all. There would be no income tax, no sales tax, no excise tax and no GST. However, we do not live in a world like that. It is not ideal yet, and it may never be, but taxes should be cut to the absolute minimum possible with the smallest possible government to deliver the minimum viable product. A small government means small taxes.

At a glance

Lost points for
AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 84

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “that is an interesting question from the member across the way.”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-19