Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Scott Anderson

118 words · 9 sentences · 10 clauses

Replying to Andréanne Larouche (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, my colleague spoke at length about the current government’s lack of transparency and less democratic approach. Thanks to work done by my colleague, the member for Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères, we included a five-year sunset clause in Bill C-5 to review the act. Strangely, the Liberals reversed that clause in Bill C‑39. This move even drew criticism from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. What does my colleague think about the fact that Bill C‑39 removes this five-year sunset clause?”
Statement grade
F
30 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 12%Positioning 88%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 14 wordsas I was saying before, I think we treat this as an abstract problem.Procedure Positioning · 104 wordsWe use big words, and we talk about how we are going to cut regulation and do all these things. Very few of us live in the real world as we work in the House. We do not have to worry about a paycheque. We do not have to worry about a mortgage. We do not sit around the kitchen table worrying about the future as people outside the House do. What we talk about in the abstract are real bread-and-butter problems out there. I would like the bill to actually make a difference. I just do not have very high hopes for it.PositioningPartly on point

Analysed on