← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity is 82. The grade is held to 76, 30 above Signal. 76 / 100, held down by Signal
Signal
46 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Aside 14% Claims 34% Positioning 34% The question 18%
Structure · 6 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Aside · 15 words let us see if we can make it three for three with the same answer. Aside Claims · 17 words Last week, the Prime Minister smiled for another photo op with chiefs to announce a new pipeline.1 Positioning · 36 words Conservatives know we need to unlock our resources and get this pipeline built, but announcements are not results, photo ops are not consultation and Liberals’ claiming relationships with chiefs and councils does not make it real. Positioning Claims · 19 words Chief Trevor Mercredi said that using first nation leaders in press conferences does not mean a vote of confidence.2 The question · 19 words Why is the Prime Minister putting crucial major projects in jeopardy by using first nation chiefs as photo ops?
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×2 Aside
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 46
3 of 3 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “let us see if we can make it three for three with the same answer.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Conservatives know we need to unlock our resources and get this pipeline built,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but announcements are not results, photo ops are not consultation and Liberals’ claiming relationships with chiefs and councils does not make it real.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 3 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Last week, the Prime Minister smiled for another photo op with chiefs to announce a new pipeline.” In the week before 9 October 2026, the Prime Minister met with chiefs to announce a new pipeline. search 2 “Chief Trevor Mercredi said that using first nation leaders in press conferences does not mean a vote of confidence.” Chief Trevor Mercredi said that using first nation leaders in press conferences does not mean a vote of confidence. search
