← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 76 / 100
Signal
75 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
71 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
82 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 19% Claims 59% The question 22%
Structure · 6 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Positioning · 7 words here is another opportunity for something new. Positioning Claims · 61 words Treaty chiefs are not the only ones calling out the Liberal government. The AFN national chief that said that those at the Major Projects Office “don’t know what they are doing when it comes to First Nations” and that it is a pattern for this government and its MPO CEOs to act like they are too good to meet with chiefs.1 2 Positioning · 15 words The truth is that treaty rights do not disappear when they become inconvenient for Liberals. Positioning Unearned certainty Claims · 9 words Chiefs are tired of the announcements and photo ops, The question · 26 words so why did the Prime Minister create a Major Projects Office just to disrespect chiefs and cover his failures on building major projects in this country? Motive imputed
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×2 Unearned certainty Motive imputed Personal attack This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “why did the Prime Minister create a Major Projects Office just to disrespect chiefs and cover his failures”.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 75
2 of 4 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “here is another opportunity for something new.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The truth is that treaty rights do not disappear when they become inconvenient for Liberals.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 71
1 of 4 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Motive imputed Claiming to know a person’s bad motives. What the tags mean → “why did the Prime Minister create a Major Projects Office just to disrespect chiefs and cover his failures” It attributes a bad hidden purpose to the Prime Minister personally as fact rather than judging the office or its record.
Clarity · 82
1 of 4 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “The truth is” It asserts certainty by formula rather than citing any source for the claim that follows.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “The AFN national chief that said that those at the Major Projects Office “don’t know what they are doing when it comes to First Nations” and that it is a pattern for this government and its MPO CEOs to act like they are too good to meet with chiefs.” The AFN national chief said that those at the Major Projects Office ‘don’t know what they are doing when it comes to First Nations’. search 2 “it is a pattern for this government and its MPO CEOs to act like they are too good to meet with chiefs” The AFN national chief said it is a pattern for the government and its MPO CEOs to act like they are too good to meet with chiefs. search
