“Mr. Speaker, as I understand it, there seems to be some confusion about what the procurement system should look like, because we have two bills before the House right now. First there is Bill C‑31, which will create a Crown corporation, and then there is Bill C‑40, which proposes a completely different process. From what I understand, once Bill C‑31 is passed, much of what we are debating today will simply go out the window. Today, in committee, the secretary of state told us that the plan was always to have a temporary structure before setting up a permanent one later. I wonder if my colleague knows why the government, in this case, is presenting us with the structure that was meant to be temporary, Bill C‑40, and the structure that is meant to be permanent, Bill C‑31, and why we are debating them at the same time in the House. What is the logic behind that?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Reasoning, Respect and Clarity. Reasoning rests on 2 conclusions, too few to hold the grade down.
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 15%Claims 85%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 5 wordsthe logic escapes me entirely.PositioningClaims · 70 wordsMost governments will make a plan and then follow the plan.The Liberal government has no plan, but it spends lots of money and makes lots of announcements, and then changes the plan that it said it had in the first place.Then it changes it again and says that it meant to change it all along.Even the PBO is confused as to what direction we are going in.Logical leapPositioning · 7 wordsI think the government is similarly confused.Positioning
