Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

François-Philippe Champagne

Liberal on The Economy 2026-10-22

73 words · 4 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Pierre Poilievre (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is out of the country again. He is signing big, meaningless declarations— Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is once again signing meaningless declarations that will not feed any Canadian and that will not house any young family that wants a home. However, he did not say a single word about a report from Food Banks Canada that says Canadians are going hungry and that there has been a 9% increase in food bank visits. Why will he not come back here and deliver affordable food for Canadians?”

Statement grade

30 / 100, held down by Relevance

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Aside 12%Procedure 5%Claims 37%Reasoning 21%Positioning 25%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Aside · 9 wordsmy Conservative colleagues seem really interested in my answer, AsideProcedure · 4 wordsso I will continue.Procedure Claims · 27 wordsAs I was saying, what is concerning for the people watching at home is that the Conservative leader has been in the House for over 20 years, ¹Reasoning · 15 wordsso he has had many opportunities to vote for measures that would have helped Canadians. Positioning · 18 wordsUnfortunately, the Conservative leader did not. On this side of the House, we will always fight for Canadians.PositioningOff pointVague promise

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 53

4 of 9 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

A remark off to the side of the point.What the tags mean “my Conservative colleagues seem really interested in my answer,”An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “so I will continue.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Unfortunately, the Conservative leader did not.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “On this side of the House, we will always fight for Canadians.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 0

4 of 9 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “As I was saying, what is concerning for the people watching at home is that the Conservative leader has been in the House for over 20 years,”The clause critiques the opposition leader’s tenure and voting record instead of answering the question about food security.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “so he has had many opportunities to vote for measures that would have helped Canadians.”The clause highlights the opposition’s lack of votes for helping Canadians but does not address the specific food insecurity issue.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Unfortunately, the Conservative leader did not.”The clause continues the political criticism of the opposition without reference to the stated crisis.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “On this side of the House, we will always fight for Canadians.”The clause makes a general political statement of commitment which does not refer to the food security subject.

Respect · 100

0 of 9 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 76

1 of 9 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we will always fight for Canadians”An open-ended commitment with no action, measure or success condition named.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the Conservative leader has been in the House for over 20 years”The Leader of the Opposition has been in the House of Commons for over 20 years.search

Analysed on 2026-10-24