Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Christine Normandin

Bloc Québécois on Government Priorities 2026-10-22

93 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Statement grade

Average 90 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 65%Positioning 24%The ask 12%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 12 wordsscientists are not the only ones speaking out against Bill C-39 today. Positioning · 10 wordsDoes Stephen Guilbeault need to get his act together too?Positioning Claims · 48 wordsStephen Guilbeault called on the government to “stop funding the destruction of nature”.¹ He criticized Bill C‑39 for allowing the minister to circumvent the Species at Risk Act, ²and he criticized the fact that the Liberals continue to subsidize fossil fuels to the tune of billions of dollars.³ Positioning · 12 wordsWill the Liberals remember the days when some of them had principles, PositioningThe ask · 11 wordsand will they stand up against the Prime Minister’s pro-oil drift?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 70

2 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Does Stephen Guilbeault need to get his act together too?”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Will the Liberals remember the days when some of them had principles,”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“stop funding the destruction of nature”Stephen Guilbeault called on the government to ‘stop funding the destruction of nature’.search
2“allowing the minister to circumvent the Species at Risk Act”Stephen Guilbeault criticized Bill C-39 for allowing the minister to circumvent the Species at Risk Act.search
3“subsidize fossil fuels to the tune of billions of dollars”Stephen Guilbeault criticized the Liberals for continuing to subsidize fossil fuels to the tune of billions of dollars.search

Analysed on 2026-10-24