← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity. Average 71 / 100
Signal
84 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
47 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
53 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 13% Claims 49% Promise 38%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 10 words I am very grateful to my colleague for her question. Thanks Claims · 37 words Obviously, as has already been mentioned in the House, our government continues to support CBC/Radio-Canada, for example, 2 as well as festivals across Canada and content produced by Canadian artists.3 We are protecting our artists in budget 2025.1 Promise · 29 words I am sure that in the upcoming budget 2026, there will even be more announcements that will continue to protect our Canadian cultural content, especially content made by francophones.4 Partly on point Vague promise
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×5 Thanks Vague promise Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 84
1 of 7 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I am very grateful to my colleague for her question.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 47
5 of 7 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Obviously,” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “as has already been mentioned in the House, our government continues to support CBC/Radio-Canada, for example,” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “as well as festivals across Canada and content produced by Canadian artists.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are protecting our artists in budget 2025.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I am sure that in the upcoming budget 2026, there will even be more announcements that will continue to protect our Canadian cultural content, especially content made by francophones.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Respect · 100
0 of 7 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 53
1 of 7 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “there will even be more announcements that will continue to protect our Canadian cultural content” The statement commits to future actions without specifying the details, measures, or content of the promised announcements.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “We are protecting our artists in budget 2025.” The government included measures to protect its artists in Budget 2025. search 2 “our government continues to support CBC/Radio-Canada, for example,” The government continues to support CBC/Radio-Canada. search 3 “as well as festivals across Canada and content produced by Canadian artists.” The government supports festivals across Canada and content produced by Canadian artists. search 4 “in the upcoming budget 2026, there will even be more announcements that will continue to protect our Canadian cultural content, especially content made by francophones.” The government stated that Budget 2026 will contain more announcements to protect Canadian cultural content, particularly content made by francophones. search
