Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

François-Philippe Champagne

97 words · 6 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Sandra Cobena (Conservative)
“Madam Speaker, the Liberal government is spending without restraint. It has added $700 billion in national debt over the last 10 years, but it is adding another $733 billion over the next five. The Liberals are costing us an additional $82,000 of debt per Canadian household. What is the outcome? It is a record 2.4 million visits to the food bank in a single month. That is the highest in Canadian history. If spending was the solution, surely Canadians would be better off by now. What good is all this spending when the very Canadians paying for it are getting poorer?”
Statement grade
A–
Average 86 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 12%Positioning 4%Claims 63%Promise 21%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Thanks · 12 wordsI have enormous respect for the colleague who just asked the question, ThanksPositioning · 4 wordsbut she knows better.Motive imputed Claims · 61 wordsShe knows that Canada has the strongest fiscal position in the G7. She knows that Canada is the only country, with Germany, to have a AAA credit rating.1 She knows that Canada has the lowest net debt to GDP in the G7.2 She knows that the IMF just confirmed in its forecast that Canada will have the second-fastest growth in 2027.3 Promise · 20 wordsShe knows that this country has everything to build, and that is what we are going to do, with Canadians.Partly on pointVague promise

Analysed on