← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity. Average 68 / 100
Signal
61 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
42 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
68 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 66% Positioning 34%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Claims · 9 words the housing crisis has been decades in the making, Positioning · 15 words and this government is taking decisive action. Vague promise We are acting head-on to fight this crisis. Positioning Vague promise Claims · 46 words In the first six months of this year, programs like MLI select have helped enable more than 141,000 units; 1 the ACLP, 81,000 rental homes; 2 and Build Canada Homes has 19,000 units under way.3 With the Canada rental protection fund, we are protecting 7,000 affordable rental units.4 Positioning · 13 words We are delivering real results for Canadians. Partly on point Vague promise This is why they elected us. Positioning Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×8 Positioning ×4 Vague promise ×3 Off point Didn't answer None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 61
4 of 16 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and this government is taking decisive action.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are acting head-on to fight this crisis.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are delivering real results for Canadians.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is why they elected us.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 42
9 of 16 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “the housing crisis has been decades in the making,” It establishes the context of the housing crisis but does not address the specific question of building or commitment.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and this government is taking decisive action.” The clause asserts that the government is acting decisively, but does not address the specific commitment to scale or doubling housing.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are acting head-on to fight this crisis.” It states the government’s approach to the crisis without directly answering whether the promise of building scale will be met.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “In the first six months of this year, programs like MLI select have helped enable more than 141,000 units;” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “the ACLP, 81,000 rental homes;” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and Build Canada Homes has 19,000 units under way.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “With the Canada rental protection fund, we are protecting 7,000 affordable rental units.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are delivering real results for Canadians.” It makes a general claim of success which touches on the outcome of the question but does not substantiate it with the required commitment.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This is why they elected us.” This clause is a general political appeal unrelated to the specific housing commitment or current actions.
Respect · 100
0 of 16 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 68
3 of 16 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “decisive action” The commitment uses qualitative language without specifying concrete metrics or targets to hold it to account.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “acting head-on to fight this crisis” The speaker uses generalized language to assert a corrective measure without providing specific goals or targets.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “delivering real results for Canadians” The claim makes an assertion of performance without defining the metrics used to measure success.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “programs like MLI select have helped enable more than 141,000 units” In the first six months of 2026, programs like MLI select helped enable more than 141,000 units. search 2 “the ACLP, 81,000 rental homes” The ACLP program has 81,000 rental homes. search 3 “Build Canada Homes has 19,000 units under way” Build Canada Homes has 19,000 units under way. search 4 “we are protecting 7,000 affordable rental units” The Canada rental protection fund is protecting 7,000 affordable rental units. search
