“Mr. Speaker, I am rising to follow up on a question I asked the Minister of National Defence about the now infamous Maritime Launch Services’ so-called spaceport in Nova Scotia. Clearly this is a project where federal money is being spent, and has been spent, without proper due diligence. It is, of course, also being spent very quickly. Just to recap, it was $200 million over 10 years for a piece of property that the company is paying only $13,500 a year to lease. That is a great ROI for the company, but it is not so good for the Canadian taxpayer. One area of concern I want to follow up on is the technology safeguards agreement. I see my colleague looking a little puzzled, so I will give him the opportunity to google it while I am asking my question. The technology safeguards agreement is a great idea. It is a government-to-government agreement that sets out the rules for protecting sensitive U.S.-origin space technology and technology that is used outside the U.S. This is important, because without a technology safeguards agreement, U.S.-origin rockets or U.S.-origin technology cannot be launched from Canada, including from the concrete pad of Maritime Launch Services. Other countries have reached technology safeguards agreements with the United States, including, fairly recently, the United Kingdom. As I understand it, substantive negotiations were completed by Canada and the United States in August 2024, at least according to Global Affairs Canada press releases. Could my colleague give the House an update on the status of that agreement, because it is completed but not yet signed and in force? Without that agreement, the company, which the government is now funding to the tune of $200 million, will be unable to launch any U.S.-origin technology or goods, which is the majority of the market it is seeking to access with its spaceport. Could my colleague give us an update on the government’s status in getting this agreement completed?”
Statement grade
C+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 70. The grade is held to 67, 30 above Relevance.
67 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 50 wordsI was provided the question that was posed, and that is what tonight is supposed to be about: reflection on the question that was posed.The question the member posed the other day in the House was all about the spaceport and why the government is investing in a spaceport.ProcedurePositioning · 15 wordsUnlike the Conservative Party, we recognize that the spaceport is not optional.It is mandatory.PositioningReasoning · 90 wordsWhen the Prime Minister or the government talks about sovereignty, having the ability to launch is part of that.Canada is in a great position to work with the European Union and others in being able to launch satellites or other objects into space.This is critical, the ability not only to launch but to expand the industry here in Canada.We are talking about the potential of literally hundreds of millions or billions of dollars of future investments, developing an industry that is there already and advancing it significantly.Anecdote · 17 wordsI think of Magellan in Winnipeg, which manufactures and produces satellites.2We cannot put those into orbit.3AnecdoteReasoning · 28 wordsCanada does not have the ability today to launch military satellites, 4if doing so was deemed to be in our interest.We would have to approach other nations.Claims · 21 wordsWe are creating a launch pad, 8and now we are also adding onto it one that, I believe, is in Newfoundland.9Partly on pointAside · 12 wordsThe member might want to do a quick Google search on that.AsideReasoning · 43 wordsHe will find that from a military perspective and, in particular the one we are talking about tonight, from a civilian perspective and in light of potential contracts, both internally and coming into Canada from other nations, it is in Canadians’ best interest.Promise · 63 wordsIt is going to develop that industry so companies like Magellan and others in our nation will be able to advance in that whole spectrum of development and manufacturing.It will allow Canada to set its priorities.We will not have to go to SpaceX or any other foreign entity in order to do the things we believe are important as a nation.Claims · 7 wordsAlso, this is a growing industry worldwide.1Positioning · 21 wordsWhy would we not want to take advantage of the technology we have already and advance it to the next level?PositioningReasoning · 13 wordsSpace sovereignty is very important.It is a part of the government’s agenda.5Promise · 30 wordsWe will continue to move in that direction because it will give us not only sovereignty but the advancement of technology and growth of our workforce by providing good-quality jobs.Vague promiseThe ask · 32 wordsI would invite my colleague across the way to come to Winnipeg, visit Magellan and look at some of the things we can develop and have the potential to put into space.Claims · 13 wordsSome are already going into space, 6but that cannot be done from Canada.7Reasoning · 27 wordsWe have to go to other nations to get that done.I believe having the space launching pad will be a positive thing for all of us.Partly on point