← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Reasoning, Respect and Clarity. Reasoning rests on one conclusion, too few to hold the grade down. Average 88 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
53 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 84% The question 16%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 76 words I am not sure that that lines up with what we were hearing in Quebec this morning. The Premier of Quebec asked to give a speech at a summit examining issues like culture, workforce mobility, the fight against global warming, 1 and agriculture. The Premier of Quebec is entitled to take the floor in the largest francophone city in North America.2 Ottawa’s response was that no, Quebec’s voice does not need to be heard at international fora.3 No reason given The question · 14 words Does the Prime Minister claim to speak for the Government of Quebec as well?
At a glance
Lost points for No reason given
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · 53
1 of 1 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “Ottawa’s response was that no, Quebec’s voice does not need to be heard at international fora.” Nothing beyond the refusal itself and the Premier’s entitlement to speak supports reading it as Quebec’s voice not being wanted; the rest is context or the question that follows.
Conclusions found · 1
Conclusion “Ottawa’s response was that no, Quebec’s voice does not need to be heard at international fora.”
Because No reason given
No reason given Nothing beyond the refusal itself and the Premier’s entitlement to speak supports reading it as Quebec’s voice not being wanted; the rest is context or the question that follows.
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “The Premier of Quebec asked to give a speech at a summit” The Premier of Quebec asked to give a speech at a summit covering topics including culture, workforce mobility, climate change and agriculture. search 2 “the largest francophone city in North America” Montreal, Quebec is the largest francophone city in North America. search 3 “Ottawa’s response was that no” The federal government refused Quebec’s request to speak at the summit. search
