Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

François-Philippe Champagne

91 words · 6 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Pierre Poilievre (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister’s 16¢-a-litre fuel standard tax is bad enough, but what is even worse is where the money goes. To quote energy expert Heather Exner-Pirot, “To meet their carbon intensity targets, many Canadian refiners blend biofuels into their petroleum products. But Canada is not self-sufficient in their production. More than half of Canada’s biofuels are imported, predominantly from the United States.” The Government of Canada forces the people of Canada to pay 16¢ a litre more to buy American biofuels. Why?”
Statement grade
F
33 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 24%Claims 54%Promise 22%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 22 wordsthe Bank of Canada understands and acknowledges the challenges in the global economy. However, it is Wednesday, Off pointand I have good news.PositioningPartly on point Claims · 49 wordsIn fact, Canada has the strongest fiscal position in the G7, the lowest net debt to GDP in the G7 and one of the lowest deficits to GDP in the G7.1 The Bank of Canada has seen that we are going to have the second-fastest growth in the G7.2 Promise · 20 wordsOn top of that, we are investing to be an energy superpower.Vague promise We are going to build Canada strong together.Off pointVague promise

Analysed on