“Mr. Speaker, when the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage considered the issue, it adopted the following recommendation: That the Government of Canada, in addressing the effects of influencers and social media on children and adolescents—and while recognizing the jurisdiction and primacy of the provinces in matters relating to social services and youth protection—adopt an asymmetrical and flexible approach. I would like to ask my hon. colleague how, with Bill C-34, the government is taking an asymmetrical and flexible approach that recognizes the jurisdiction and primacy of Quebec and the provinces and how the government consulted and worked with Quebec and the provinces on this bill.”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 90 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 48%Claims 52%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 7 wordsI think the two approaches are complementary.Claims · 46 wordsI have been watching the work of the Quebec National Assembly.It has focused on the effects of screen use in school, how families can better support their children, and specific health and education issues.Partly on pointI believe that Bill C‑41 addresses problems created by global platforms.Reasoning · 48 wordsI also believe the federal government has a fundamental role to play in establishing appropriate standards while giving platforms an opportunity to adapt.If they do so, then there will be no need for age verification.If they do not, I think it is our duty to intervene.Vague promiseClaims · 13 wordsI think this approach is in line with what almost all Quebeckers want.Partly on point
