← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 78. The grade is held to 74, 30 above Relevance. 74 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
44 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
69 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 66% Promise 34%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 10
Echo · said 6 times
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 97 words there is a piece in the legislation on the duties of operators, 1 which would hold big tech accountable, 2 and in there is the duty to act responsibly. It would require social media and these platforms and services like chatbots to assess and mitigate risks associated with seven categories of harmful content.3 Those categories are intimate content communicated without consent; 4 content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor; 5 content that induces a child to harm themselves ; 6 content used to bully a child; 7 content that foments hatred; 8 content that incites violence; 9 and terrorism or violent extremism content.10 Promise · 51 words A piece of this that we will have to look at when this moves to committee is ensuring that there would be true accountability by these content providers and that it is not just an illusion. Vague promise As such, this is something that we will be talking about as this moves forward. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×13 Vague promise Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate. Echo ×6 “Content that induces a child to harm themselves.” Said 6 times by 6 members. Every time it was said →
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 14 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 44
13 of 14 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “there is a piece in the legislation on the duties of operators,” Describes the bill’s duties of operators without addressing the fear of government backing down.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “which would hold big tech accountable,” About the bill’s accountability provisions, not whether the government would yield to pressure.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and in there is the duty to act responsibly.” Describes a duty in the bill without addressing the question asked.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would require social media and these platforms and services like chatbots to assess and mitigate risks associated with seven categories of harmful content.” Details the bill’s risk-assessment requirements rather than the concern raised.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Those categories are intimate content communicated without consent;” Lists a category of harmful content in the bill, not the question put.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor;” Lists a category of harmful content in the bill, not the question put.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “content that induces a child to harm themselves;” Lists a category of harmful content in the bill, not the question put.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “content used to bully a child;” Lists a category of harmful content in the bill, not the question put.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “content that foments hatred;” Lists a category of harmful content in the bill, not the question put.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “content that incites violence;” Lists a category of harmful content in the bill, not the question put.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and terrorism or violent extremism content.” Lists a category of harmful content in the bill, not the question put.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “A piece of this that we will have to look at when this moves to committee is ensuring that there would be true accountability by these content providers and that it is not just an illusion.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “As such, this is something that we will be talking about as this moves forward.” Says the matter will be discussed later without addressing the concern raised.
Respect · 100
0 of 14 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 69
1 of 14 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “ensuring that there would be true accountability by these content providers” The statement commits to ensuring a future outcome without specifying the actors or the measures to be taken.
Echo · 1 repeated line
Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.
“Content that induces a child to harm themselves.” Said 6 times by 6 members. Every time it was said →
Claims · 10
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “there is a piece in the legislation on the duties of operators” Bill C-34 includes provisions detailing the duties of operators. search 2 “which would hold big tech accountable” The duties included in the legislation are intended to hold big tech accountable. search 3 “require social media and these platforms and services like chatbots to assess and mitigate risks associated with seven categories of harmful content” Bill C-34 would require social media platforms and services to assess and mitigate risks associated with seven categories of harmful content. search 4 “intimate content communicated without consent” One of the seven categories of harmful content defined in Bill C-34 is intimate content communicated without consent. search 5 “content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor” Another category of harmful content defined in Bill C-34 is content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor. search 6 “content that induces a child to harm themselves” A category of harmful content defined in Bill C-34 is content that induces a child to harm themselves. search 7 “content used to bully a child” A category of harmful content defined in Bill C-34 is content used to bully a child. search 8 “content that foments hatred” A category of harmful content defined in Bill C-34 is content that foments hatred. search 9 “content that incites violence” A category of harmful content defined in Bill C-34 is content that incites violence. search 10 “terrorism or violent extremism content” A category of harmful content defined in Bill C-34 is terrorism or violent extremism content. search
