Analysis · beta

Tamara Jansen

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, as I tried to allude to earlier, the discussions and debates on this issue have been around for decades, starting in the early nineties. It is good that we have personal opinions and we want to share those personal opinions. Does the member have any sense of whether the constituents she represents reflect her opinion? Does she have any indication of what her constituents would have to say on this legislation?”

Not analysed yet

A requested analysis is usually ready within half an hour; come back to this page or reload it.

Mr. Speaker, the political gamesmanship here is absolutely shameful. The government knows full well that Parliament has to act before March 17 to prevent MAID from expanding to mental illness alone. However, instead of introducing a straightforward bill to do exactly that, the Liberals have tied it to an entirely separate expansion of assisted dying. They are using an approaching deadline to pressure Parliament into accepting something it has not properly studied. They are holding the protection of one vulnerable group hostage against the expansion of MAID for another. If the government genuinely wants to protect Canadians struggling with mental illness, there is a very simple solution: split the bill and pass that protection immediately.