Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau

106 words · 8 sentences · 9 clauses

Replying to Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal)
“Madam Speaker, I thank our colleague for her excellent speech. I would note two useful points. First, she said that the bill’s objective is noble. Second, she said that the Canadian government has to show leadership in health care across the country, including in Quebec. I would like to ask her whether she has had an opportunity in recent months to speak with researchers or experts in her riding who work on health data about the importance of having access to these data, and about the extent to which technological barriers put in place by large companies—barriers that often transcend the borders of a single province—can make accessing these critical data difficult, knowing full well that data can save lives.”
Statement grade
B–
70 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 8%Reasoning 24%Claims 21%Anecdote 23%Positioning 25%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Thanks · 8 wordsmy colleague is right to a large extent.Thanks Reasoning · 7 wordsIndeed, without data, how can we act? Claims · 22 wordsScientists say that they want to do more, but that we have decades of data to compile before we can make changes.1 Reasoning · 8 wordsThat said, it matters who has the control. Anecdote · 24 wordsConsider, for example, a father who tells all his kids that he is going to manage everything and keep all the information to himself.Anecdote Positioning · 27 wordsWe prefer self-determination. We believe that each of the children, the provinces and territories, should be trusted and provided with whatever they need to obtain that data.Positioning Reasoning · 10 wordsThen, these data can be pooled together to save lives.

Analysed on