Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Mario Simard

Bloc Québécois on Connected Care for Canadians Act 2026-11-05

49 words · 2 sentences · 3 clauses

Replying to Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal)

“Madam Speaker, there seems to be some confusion in the remarks made by my colleague, for whom I have a great deal of respect. This has nothing to do with the decisions made by the Government of Quebec. What this bill aims to do is regulate the activities of organizations, including multinationals, that are unfortunately restricting access to data needed by patients and health care professionals. Does my colleague acknowledge that there is some confusion in what he said? The Quebec government is not the target here; technology companies are.”

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Aside 14%Claims 86%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Aside · 7 wordsI admit that I get confused sometimes, AsideClaims · 42 wordsbut as for this bill, I would invite my colleague from Québec Centre to reread clause 7. He will learn that the government is giving itself the option of enforcing a law in an area of jurisdiction that is not its responsibility.¹

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 84

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

A remark off to the side of the point.What the tags mean “I admit that I get confused sometimes,”An aside: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“giving itself the option of enforcing a law in an area of jurisdiction that is not its responsibility”Clause 7 of Bill S-5 gives the federal government the option of enforcing a law in an area of jurisdiction that is not its responsibility.search

Analysed on 2026-11-06