← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 85. The grade is held to 74, 30 above Relevance. 74 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
44 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
95 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
Structure · 2 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Claims · 140 words I mentioned a few examples in my speech of frustration with always having to remember one’s medical care record or the history of one’s procedures.1 We have all experienced that. Unearned certainty Sometimes we forget, sometimes we may have remembered things wrong, and it proves a hindrance to our care. Sometimes it causes delays, really dangerous delays. We heard the minister mention the example of Theresa and her family.2 We want to avoid that. As we continue to have discussions with providers, doctors and clinicians are telling us about the importance of having the legislation passed because it would enable data sharing. It would enable more connected care. It would help them facilitate care that is more beneficial to the health outcomes of patients. We are very optimistic about the future of more connected care in Canada that the bill would enable. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×11 Unearned certainty
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 12 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 44
11 of 12 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I mentioned a few examples in my speech of frustration with always having to remember one’s medical care record or the history of one’s procedures.” About patients’ general frustration with carrying their own records, not the barriers faced by rural and remote communities.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We have all experienced that.” About a shared general experience, not the rural and remote access the question raised.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Sometimes we forget, sometimes we may have remembered things wrong,” About patients misremembering their histories, not the communities named in the question.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and it proves a hindrance to our care.” About hindrances to care generally, not barriers specific to rural and remote Canadians.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Sometimes it causes delays, really dangerous delays.” About dangerous delays in general, not the access question raised for remote communities.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We heard the minister mention the example of Theresa and her family.” Recalls a family’s example from the minister, without addressing rural and remote barriers to care.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We want to avoid that.” States a general wish to avoid such cases, not the access question asked.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “As we continue to have discussions with providers, doctors and clinicians are telling us about the importance of having the legislation passed because it would enable data sharing.” About clinicians supporting the bill’s data sharing generally, not the barriers facing rural and remote communities.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would enable more connected care.” About connected care generally under the bill, not the specific populations the question named.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would help them facilitate care that is more beneficial to the health outcomes of patients.” About better health outcomes for patients generally, not the rural and remote access asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are very optimistic about the future of more connected care in Canada that the bill would enable.” Expresses optimism about connected care under the bill generally, not the question’s rural and remote focus.
Respect · 100
0 of 12 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 95
1 of 12 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “We have all experienced that” It asserts a universal shared experience as fact without any source or evidence.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “I mentioned a few examples in my speech of frustration with always having to remember one’s medical care record or the history of one’s procedures.” The speaker mentioned in a previous speech that there was frustration regarding patients needing to remember their medical history and procedures. search 2 “We heard the minister mention the example of Theresa and her family.” The minister cited an example involving Theresa and her family, as recounted by the speaker. search
