← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 68. The grade is held to 56, 30 above Signal. 56 / 100, held down by Signal
Signal
26 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
48 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 13% Reasoning 28% Anecdote 58%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 18 words my colleague is right to emphasize the importance of security in data sharing. His remarks were very eloquent. Thanks Reasoning · 14 words We also need to recognize the importance of making the data accessible across Canada. Anecdote · 80 words For example, I could get sick on a trip to Edmonton. If the doctor who cares for me in Edmonton is unable to access important personal data to save my life, that is a problem for me. I could be a student in Gatineau who lives in Ottawa. I could get sick in Gatineau and may have to be moved to a hospital in Ottawa to be able to access my medical data so that the doctor can treat me. Anecdote Reasoning · 25 words That is a waste of time, and it could also put my health at risk. Connectivity to support nationwide data sharing is also very important. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×8 Anecdote ×4 Thanks ×2 Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate. Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 26
6 of 14 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “my colleague is right to emphasize the importance of security in data sharing.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “His remarks were very eloquent.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “For example, I could get sick on a trip to Edmonton.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “If the doctor who cares for me in Edmonton is unable to access important personal data to save my life, that is a problem for me.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “I could be a student in Gatineau who lives in Ottawa.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “I could get sick in Gatineau and may have to be moved to a hospital in Ottawa to be able to access my medical data so that the doctor can treat me.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 48
8 of 14 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We also need to recognize the importance of making the data accessible across Canada.” The focus is on making data accessible across Canada, which is a different objective than addressing cyber threats.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “For example, I could get sick on a trip to Edmonton.” The clause provides an example of personal situation related to travel, which pertains to data accessibility, not security measures.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “If the doctor who cares for me in Edmonton is unable to access important personal data to save my life, that is a problem for me.” This points out a risk related to data inaccessibility, which is a functional issue, not a cybersecurity vulnerability.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I could be a student in Gatineau who lives in Ottawa.” The clause offers an example of cross-jurisdictional living, which is about logistics and access rather than technical security.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I could get sick in Gatineau and may have to be moved to a hospital in Ottawa to be able to access my medical data so that the doctor can treat me.” It describes the logistical challenge of accessing medical data in a different province, focusing on access rather than prevention of attacks.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “That is a waste of time,” This is a comment on the inefficiency of a scenario, which relates to the problem but doesn’t answer the technical question.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and it could also put my health at risk.” The focus is on risks stemming from lack of data access, not risks from cyberattacks on the system.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Connectivity to support nationwide data sharing is also very important.” It emphasizes connectivity for data sharing, which is a broad part of the bill’s goal, but avoids the specific question about government-led security measures.
Respect · 100
0 of 14 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 14 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
