Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Dan Albas

101 words · 6 sentences · 9 clauses

Replying to Harb Gill (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, if this bill is about putting patients first, why does the government not establish clear consequences and penalties when health care technology companies fail to protect or properly share Canadians’ medical information?”
Statement grade
B+
81 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 44%Reasoning 26%Claims 5%Promise 9%The ask 17%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 39 wordsthat is a tough but fair question, and one for which I must show respect to the member. I affectionately call him the sheriff because of his previous career in law enforcement, during which he served his community ably.1Thanks Reasoning · 26 wordsI would simply say that we can have a rule, but if we do not have consequences, then people are not going to respect the law. Thanks · 5 wordsThe sheriff is absolutely right.Thanks Claims · 5 wordsThere needs to be more. Promise · 9 wordsThis is why we should get it to committee, The ask · 17 wordsand it is why that member, I hope, will be pushing for those penalties to be clarified.

Analysed on