← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity. Average 66 / 100
Signal
45 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
45 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
73 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 51% Reasoning 49%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 11 words the member, in posing the questions, highlighted something I had indicated. Positioning Reasoning · 50 words If everyone would do exactly what she did with respect to her question, which is to put the patient first and look at it through that lens, I suspect that the debate would be well served not only on the floor of the House of Commons but also in committee. Positioning · 41 words I can assure the member that it does not matter what side of the House one looks at. I believe every member wants to ensure the privacy and protection of data. Unearned certainty There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind on that. Positioning Partly on point Unearned certainty
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×6 Positioning ×4 Unearned certainty ×2 Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 45
4 of 12 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “the member, in posing the questions, highlighted something I had indicated.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I can assure the member that it does not matter what side of the House one looks at.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I believe every member wants to ensure the privacy and protection of data.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind on that.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 45
6 of 12 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “the member, in posing the questions, highlighted something I had indicated.” It comments on the member’s question rather than addressing how consent or protection would work.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “If everyone would do exactly what she did with respect to her question,” It praises the manner of the question, not the consent or protection measures asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “which is to put the patient first and look at it through that lens, I suspect that the debate would be well served not only on the floor of the House of Commons but also in committee.” It stays on the patient-first lens but speaks of the debate’s quality, not how data would be protected.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I can assure the member that it does not matter what side of the House one looks at.” It addresses attitudes across the House, not how consent or data protection would be ensured.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I believe every member wants to ensure the privacy and protection of data.” It affirms members value data privacy without saying how the bill would secure it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind on that.” It restates personal certainty about members’ intentions, not the protection measures asked about.
Respect · 100
0 of 12 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 73
2 of 12 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “I believe every member wants to ensure the privacy and protection of data” The speaker asserts a universal shared belief among all members without providing evidence.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind on that” The speaker presents their strong personal conviction as an objective, undisputed fact.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
