Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Pierre Poilievre

Conservative on Public Services and Procurement 2026-11-05

104 words · 3 sentences · 7 clauses

Statement grade

B+

Average 84 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 53%Positioning 8%Reasoning 21%The question 18%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 25 wordsI will confess that I have no idea how to build up $733 billion of new debt, which is what he is planning to do, Positioning · 8 wordsand it is going to the Liberal club.Positioning Claims · 30 wordsThe Prime Minister has attempted to distract using the Trump card to justify the 2.3 billion tax dollars he has given to Telesat, the company of his friend Dan Goldberg, Motive imputedReasoning · 22 wordsbut the excuse does not work, because Telesat is giving a billion of those dollars to Elon Musk’s SpaceX for launch capabilities. The question · 19 wordsHas the Prime Minister ever discussed Telesat with his public servants, his ministers or his staff, yes or no?

At a glance

Lost points for
Personal attackThis statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “the company of his friend Dan Goldberg”.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 89

1 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “and it is going to the Liberal club.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 64

1 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Claiming to know a person’s bad motives.What the tags mean “the company of his friend Dan Goldberg”It attributes a personal friendship to the Prime Minister to imply the funding decision was driven by that relationship.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-11-06