Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Jamil Jivani

Conservative on Public Services and Procurement 2026-11-05

89 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Statement grade

Average 91 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 22%Claims 65%The question 12%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 20 wordswe see another example of the Liberals deflecting and dodging a very important question about $2.3 billion of taxpayer money.¹Positioning Claims · 24 wordsWhat we are pointing out is that the AI minister took the correct steps of adding Telesat CEO Dan Goldberg to his ethics screen.² The question · 11 wordsThe question is why the Prime Minister cannot do the same. Claims · 34 wordsTheir personal friend Dan Goldberg has been personally enriched by a government contract and Canadians deserve to know why the Prime Minister will not acknowledge his friendship in his conflict of interest ethics screen.³

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 72

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “we see another example of the Liberals deflecting and dodging a very important question about $2.3 billion of taxpayer money.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“$2.3 billion of taxpayer money”The matter under question involves $2.3 billion of taxpayer money.search
2“adding Telesat CEO Dan Goldberg to his ethics screen”The AI minister added Telesat CEO Dan Goldberg to his ethics screen.search
3“Dan Goldberg has been personally enriched by a government contract”Telesat CEO Dan Goldberg has been personally enriched by a Government of Canada contract.search

Analysed on 2026-11-06