Greeting 1% Procedure 9% Positioning 14% Claims 52% Reasoning 21% Anecdote 2% The ask 2%
Structure · 48 steps
Claims · 10
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Greeting · 11 words I look forward to sharing a few thoughts on Bill C-268. Greeting Procedure · 43 words I do think it is important to begin by discussing the context, in terms of the economic situation of our country. This bill includes an aspiration about opportunities that can be associated with rural connectivity. As members know, we are supportive of that. Procedure Positioning · 14 words The broader context, when it comes to opportunity for Canadians, is a challenging one. Positioning Claims · 6 words Yesterday, the government announced its budget.1 Reasoning · 40 words A budget is primarily about the government making the case for the things that it wants to do and the impact that it proposes will result from its policy. It is an exposition of the government’s proposals, ideas and plans. Claims · 47 words On the other hand, today, we received the jobs report, 2 which is a report card, an assessment based on realities in the real world of what is actually happening in the economy, and gives us a real picture of whether or not the government’s plans are working. Positioning · 11 words The contrast between yesterday’s message and today’s reality is quite striking. Positioning Unearned certainty Claims · 13 words Yesterday, the government talked about all the jobs it was going to create. Off point Procedure · 8 words Today, we heard the results. Here they are. Procedure Claims · 13 words More than 50,000 private sector jobs were lost in the last month alone.3 Hidden agency Positioning · 9 words Those are the realities, not hypotheses about the future. Positioning Unearned certainty Claims · 47 words We saw an increase in youth unemployment from 13% to 13.7%, 4 and an increase in the overall unemployment rate from 6.5% to 6.7%.5 The unemployment rate for 55-plus went up as well. There were increases across different demographics in the unemployment rate, increasing the unemployment rate overall. Off point Procedure · 16 words Underneath that, we see some other data points that I think are important to dwell on. Procedure Claims · 85 words Number one, it is getting harder for unemployed people to find a job. The statistics track job-finding rates. Fewer than one in five unemployed Canadians found a job in the last month.6 It is getting harder for people who are out of work to find a job. Also, the Statistics Canada report today looked at financial insecurity in households. Three out of 10 Canadians are living in a financially insecure household.7 That is a household where people are struggling to pay for their basic needs. Positioning · 19 words We have a situation where people are working hard and yet there is an increase in that financial insecurity. Positioning Claims · 28 words Adding to that is the reality that Canadians are working longer hours, Hidden agency which is also in the jobs report. Canadians are less likely to be working at all. Reasoning · 35 words If they are working, they are working longer hours and yet they are seeing higher levels of financial insecurity. If they are unemployed, they are having a harder time than ever before of finding jobs. Off point Procedure · 8 words Now, these are the realities in our economy. Procedure Unearned certainty Claims · 25 words First of all, we asked about the jobs report in question period, and the government consistently refused to respond or even mention the jobs report. Positioning · 18 words The Liberals want to talk about the budget. We are happy to debate the provisions of the budget, Positioning Claims · 23 words but they do not want to acknowledge the existence of the jobs report, which is the report card, the results of their policies. Positioning · 8 words The jobs report shows the government is failing. Positioning Unearned certainty Claims · 12 words The Liberals do not even want to acknowledge or talk about it, Positioning · 11 words and yet we have all of these numbers that demonstrate problems. Positioning Claims · 58 words These numbers demonstrate that it is harder to find a job than ever before, that more Canadians are unemployed than in the past, that it is particularly hard for young people to start out in life and access opportunities, and that those who are working are working longer and are more likely to be dealing with financial insecurity. Positioning · 24 words These are the realities that I think demonstrate that the government’s approach is not as sunny as it would like to pretend it is. Positioning Claims · 23 words Moreover, when we highlight these problems, the Liberals say, “Stop talking things down. We should be optimistic. Why are you saying negative things?” Reasoning · 13 words I think it is important that we speak truth and look at realities. Unearned certainty Anecdote · 25 words A young person who edits their credit card statement before they give it to their parents is not doing themselves or anyone else any good. Anecdote Reasoning · 47 words The goal of looking frankly at these realities is to try to promote concrete action to address them so that we can solve the problems our country is facing. Vague promise We want to solve these problems. Vague promise We want to identify problems and then propose constructive solutions to them. Vague promise Positioning · 33 words The government putting its head in the sand, pretending that problems do not exist and pretending that things are sunnier than they are is not going to lead to solutions to the problems. Positioning Off point Procedure · 56 words Let us look at the jobs report. Let us talk about the frank problems it demonstrates in terms of it being harder to find a job, harder to get ahead and harder to make ends meet even for those who are working. Let us talk about those problems and then let us talk about concrete solutions. Procedure Vague promise Claims · 157 words In the lead-up to the budget, Conservatives proposed detailed, concrete solutions. A year ago, we presented a jobs plan that focused on unleashing the economy, fixing immigration, fixing training and building homes where the jobs are.8 There were concrete proposals associated with all of those areas of recommendation. We have not seen action from the government on any of our proposals. In fact, in many cases, it has moved in the opposite direction. We also presented five different substantial constructive proposals to support families, like working to integrate work and family life, reforms to parental leave and changes to CPP to ensure that parents are not penalized for being with their kids later on in their retirement years.9 These are no- or low-cost proposals that would make life substantially better for Canadians, in one case protecting families impacted by the death of a parent. It was a proposal that cost less than a $1 million a year.10 Positioning · 11 words The Liberals are zero for five on implementing these constructive ideas. Positioning Reasoning · 54 words One would think they would have seen the constructive proposals coming from the opposition on jobs and families and said, “Let us put some of them in the budget. Maybe it will be harder for the opposition to criticize the budget if we take some of their good ideas and put them in there.” Claims · 64 words However, it is oh for four on taking ideas from the jobs plan, and oh for five on taking ideas from our proposals to support families. We see today the result of their unwillingness to listen to the constructive ideas that have come forward in the House. The result is a continuing worsening situation when it comes to jobs and financial security for families. Off point Reasoning · 32 words When it comes to the issue of jobs and connectivity, which the bill deals with, in rural and remote communities, addressing connectivity gaps can contribute to opportunities for people to have employment. Claims · 53 words One of the areas we are working on regarding jobs and opportunities in remote areas is to promote the construction of housing where the jobs are. We see high levels of unemployment in certain regions, which often but not always are bigger cities, and then there are labour force needs in other places. Reasoning · 20 words We want to support Canadians taking Canadian jobs, and that includes having an ability to take jobs where they are. Claims · 60 words One of the barriers that can contribute to making it harder for people to relocate for jobs and opportunity is the availability of housing. We have introduced as part of our plan a significant incentive around workforce housing construction, making it easier to build homes where the jobs are and for people to choose to locate near where jobs are. Off point Reasoning · 40 words Connectivity is part of that. It is one thing that allows opportunities to grow in remote areas and makes it easier for people to make a choice to locate in a different area in order to get jobs and opportunity. Claims · 7 words Conservatives have been supportive of the bill. Positioning · 7 words We have been constructive in the process. Positioning Claims · 27 words We have contributed to the work that needs to happen in the area of promoting connectivity, work that I think the government has been way behind on. Positioning · 37 words Sadly, this is existing within an overall picture in which jobs are down and the government is failing. The Liberals want us to ignore their failure and feel sunny and happy about their hopes for the future. Positioning Reasoning · 19 words We need to look squarely at the realities and challenges and do the work necessary to address these problems. Vague promise The ask · 26 words That should include implementing the constructive solutions that we have put forward as part of our jobs plan and our plan for work and family life. Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×76 Positioning ×14 Procedure ×10 Unearned certainty ×5 Vague promise ×5 Hidden agency ×2 Greeting Anecdote
Off topic Only 9% of this speech directly addressed the bill under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 68
26 of 114 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Greeting Greetings and pleasantries. What the tags mean → “I look forward to sharing a few thoughts on Bill C-268.” A greeting: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I do think it is important to begin by discussing the context, in terms of the economic situation of our country.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “This bill includes an aspiration about opportunities that can be associated with rural connectivity.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “As members know, we are supportive of that.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The broader context, when it comes to opportunity for Canadians, is a challenging one.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The contrast between yesterday’s message and today’s reality is quite striking.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Today, we heard the results.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Here they are.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Those are the realities, not hypotheses about the future.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Underneath that, we see some other data points that I think are important to dwell on.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We have a situation where people are working hard and yet there is an increase in that financial insecurity.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Now, these are the realities in our economy.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The Liberals want to talk about the budget.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are happy to debate the provisions of the budget,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The jobs report shows the government is failing.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and yet we have all of these numbers that demonstrate problems.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “These are the realities that I think demonstrate that the government’s approach is not as sunny as it would like to pretend it is.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “A young person who edits their credit card statement before they give it to their parents is not doing themselves or anyone else any good.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The government putting its head in the sand, pretending that problems do not exist and pretending that things are sunnier than they are is not going to lead to solutions to the problems.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Let us look at the jobs report.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Let us talk about the frank problems it demonstrates in terms of it being harder to find a job, harder to get ahead and harder to make ends meet even for those who are working.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Let us talk about those problems and then let us talk about concrete solutions.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The Liberals are zero for five on implementing these constructive ideas.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We have been constructive in the process.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Sadly, this is existing within an overall picture in which jobs are down and the government is failing.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The Liberals want us to ignore their failure and feel sunny and happy about their hopes for the future.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 9
76 of 114 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The broader context, when it comes to opportunity for Canadians, is a challenging one.” About the country’s general economic situation, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Yesterday, the government announced its budget.” About the government’s budget, a subject the bill does not touch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “A budget is primarily about the government making the case for the things that it wants to do and the impact that it proposes will result from its policy.” About what budgets are generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is an exposition of the government’s proposals, ideas and plans.” About the government’s budget proposals, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “On the other hand, today, we received the jobs report,” About the jobs report, a subject the bill does not touch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which is a report card, an assessment based on realities in the real world of what is actually happening in the economy,” About the jobs report, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and gives us a real picture of whether or not the government’s plans are working.” About assessing the government’s economic plans, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The contrast between yesterday’s message and today’s reality is quite striking.” About the contrast between the budget and the jobs report, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Yesterday, the government talked about all the jobs it was going to create.” About the budget’s job promises, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “More than 50,000 private sector jobs were lost in the last month alone.” About job losses in the jobs report, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Those are the realities, not hypotheses about the future.” About the jobs report figures, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We saw an increase in youth unemployment from 13% to 13.7%,” About youth unemployment figures, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and an increase in the overall unemployment rate from 6.5% to 6.7%.” About overall unemployment figures, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The unemployment rate for 55-plus went up as well.” About older-worker unemployment figures, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There were increases across different demographics in the unemployment rate, increasing the unemployment rate overall.” About unemployment across demographics, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Number one, it is getting harder for unemployed people to find a job.” About difficulty finding work, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The statistics track job-finding rates.” About jobs report statistics, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Fewer than one in five unemployed Canadians found a job in the last month.” About job-finding rates, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is getting harder for people who are out of work to find a job.” About difficulty finding work, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Also, the Statistics Canada report today looked at financial insecurity in households.” About household financial insecurity in the jobs report, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Three out of 10 Canadians are living in a financially insecure household.” About financial insecurity figures, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is a household where people are struggling to pay for their basic needs.” About struggling households, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have a situation where people are working hard and yet there is an increase in that financial insecurity.” About financial insecurity among workers, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Adding to that is the reality that Canadians are working longer hours,” About hours worked, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which is also in the jobs report.” About the jobs report contents, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Canadians are less likely to be working at all.” About employment levels, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “If they are working, they are working longer hours and yet they are seeing higher levels of financial insecurity.” About working hours and financial insecurity, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “If they are unemployed, they are having a harder time than ever before of finding jobs.” About unemployed job seekers, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “First of all, we asked about the jobs report in question period,” About question period exchanges on the jobs report, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and the government consistently refused to respond or even mention the jobs report.” About the government’s response to jobs report questions, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Liberals want to talk about the budget.” About the Liberals and the budget, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are happy to debate the provisions of the budget,” About debating the budget, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but they do not want to acknowledge the existence of the jobs report,” About the government’s handling of the jobs report, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which is the report card, the results of their policies.” About the jobs report as a record of government policy, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The jobs report shows the government is failing.” About the government’s record on jobs, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Liberals do not even want to acknowledge or talk about it,” About the Liberals’ treatment of the jobs report, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and yet we have all of these numbers that demonstrate problems.” About jobs report numbers, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “These numbers demonstrate that it is harder to find a job than ever before, that more Canadians are unemployed than in the past, that it is particularly hard for young people to start out in life and access opportunities,” About unemployment figures, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and that those who are working are working longer and are more likely to be dealing with financial insecurity.” About working conditions and financial insecurity, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “These are the realities that I think demonstrate that the government’s approach is not as sunny as it would like to pretend it is.” About the government’s economic approach, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Moreover, when we highlight these problems, the Liberals say, “Stop talking things down.” About Liberal responses to economic criticism, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We should be optimistic.” About Liberal calls for optimism, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Why are you saying negative things?”” About Liberal objections to negative talk, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I think it is important that we speak truth and look at realities.” About speaking frankly on the economy, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “A young person who edits their credit card statement before they give it to their parents is not doing themselves or anyone else any good.” About an analogy to hiding bad news, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The goal of looking frankly at these realities is to try to promote concrete action to address them so that we can solve the problems our country is facing.” About addressing the country’s economic problems generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We want to solve these problems.” About solving economic problems generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We want to identify problems and then propose constructive solutions to them.” About proposing solutions to economic problems generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The government putting its head in the sand, pretending that problems do not exist and pretending that things are sunnier than they are is not going to lead to solutions to the problems.” About the government’s handling of economic problems, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In the lead-up to the budget, Conservatives proposed detailed, concrete solutions.” About Conservative budget proposals, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “A year ago, we presented a jobs plan that focused on unleashing the economy, fixing immigration, fixing training and building homes where the jobs are.” About the Conservative jobs plan, a different policy area than the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There were concrete proposals associated with all of those areas of recommendation.” About the jobs plan proposals, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have not seen action from the government on any of our proposals.” About government inaction on the jobs plan, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In fact, in many cases, it has moved in the opposite direction.” About government direction on the jobs plan, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We also presented five different substantial constructive proposals to support families, like working to integrate work and family life, reforms to parental leave and changes to CPP to ensure that parents are not penalized for being with their kids later on in their retirement years.” About Conservative family support proposals, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “These are no- or low-cost proposals that would make life substantially better for Canadians, in one case protecting families impacted by the death of a parent.” About family support proposals, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It was a proposal that cost less than a $1 million a year.” About the cost of a family proposal, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Liberals are zero for five on implementing these constructive ideas.” About the government’s record on family proposals, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “One would think they would have seen the constructive proposals coming from the opposition on jobs and families and said, “Let us put some of them in the budget.” About the budget and Conservative ideas, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Maybe it will be harder for the opposition to criticize the budget if we take some of their good ideas and put them in there.”” About the budget and Conservative ideas, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “However, it is oh for four on taking ideas from the jobs plan,” About the government’s record on the jobs plan, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and oh for five on taking ideas from our proposals to support families.” About the government’s record on family proposals, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We see today the result of their unwillingness to listen to the constructive ideas that have come forward in the House.” About the government ignoring opposition ideas, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The result is a continuing worsening situation when it comes to jobs and financial security for families.” About worsening jobs and financial security, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “One of the areas we are working on regarding jobs and opportunities in remote areas is to promote the construction of housing where the jobs are.” About the Conservatives’ housing construction proposal, not the bill’s connectivity measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We see high levels of unemployment in certain regions,” About regional unemployment patterns, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which often but not always are bigger cities,” About where unemployment is concentrated, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and then there are labour force needs in other places.” About labour force needs by region, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We want to support Canadians taking Canadian jobs,” About supporting workers taking jobs, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and that includes having an ability to take jobs where they are.” About relocating for jobs, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “One of the barriers that can contribute to making it harder for people to relocate for jobs and opportunity is the availability of housing.” About housing as a barrier to relocation, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have introduced as part of our plan a significant incentive around workforce housing construction, making it easier to build homes where the jobs are and for people to choose to locate near where jobs are.” About the Conservative workforce housing incentive, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Sadly, this is existing within an overall picture in which jobs are down and the government is failing.” About the government’s failure on jobs generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Liberals want us to ignore their failure and feel sunny and happy about their hopes for the future.” About the government’s economic record, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We need to look squarely at the realities and challenges and do the work necessary to address these problems.” About addressing economic challenges generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That should include implementing the constructive solutions that we have put forward as part of our jobs plan and our plan for work and family life.” About implementing the Conservative jobs plan and family plan, not the bill.
Respect · 100
0 of 114 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 86
12 of 114 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “today’s reality” Frames the speaker’s characterization as ‘reality’ itself.
Hidden agency Wording that hides who did something, or who will. What the tags mean → “More than 50,000 private sector jobs were lost” Passive without an actor; the missing agent is the point of the claim.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “the realities” Labels figures as ‘realities’ versus hypotheses, an asserted framing rather than a sourced claim.
Hidden agency Wording that hides who did something, or who will. What the tags mean → “Canadians are working longer hours” No — this is checkable from the jobs report.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “these are the realities in our economy” Asserts the framing as reality itself.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “The jobs report shows the government is failing” ‘Failing’ is an evaluative verdict, not something the report literally states; the phrase asserts the report as the source for it.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “speak truth” Asserts the speaker’s statements as ‘truth’ without source.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “to try to promote concrete action to address them” The speaker’s own commitment names no measure, actor beyond ‘we’, or checkable outcome.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “We want to solve these problems” A commitment with no measure, date, or success condition.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “then propose constructive solutions to them” Vague commitment with no specific measures named.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “let us talk about concrete solutions” An intention with no actor commitment, measure, or date.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “do the work necessary to address these problems” The commitment names no measure, date, or success condition.
Claims · 10
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Yesterday, the government announced its budget” The federal government announced its budget on November 5, 2026. search
2 “today, we received the jobs report” A Statistics Canada jobs report was released on November 6, 2026. search
3 “More than 50,000 private sector jobs were lost in the last month alone” More than 50,000 private sector jobs were lost in Canada in the month covered by the November 2026 jobs report. search
4 “an increase in youth unemployment from 13% to 13.7%” Canada’s youth unemployment rate rose from 13% to 13.7% in the month covered by the November 2026 jobs report. search
5 “an increase in the overall unemployment rate from 6.5% to 6.7%” Canada’s overall unemployment rate rose from 6.5% to 6.7% in the month covered by the November 2026 jobs report. search
6 “Fewer than one in five unemployed Canadians found a job in the last month” Fewer than one in five unemployed Canadians found a job in the month covered by the November 2026 jobs report. search
7 “Three out of 10 Canadians are living in a financially insecure household” Three out of 10 Canadians live in a financially insecure household, according to the Statistics Canada report released November 6, 2026. search
8 “A year ago, we presented a jobs plan” The Conservative Party presented a jobs plan around November 2025 focused on the economy, immigration, training and housing. search
9 “We also presented five different substantial constructive proposals to support families” The Conservative Party presented five proposals to support families, including parental leave reforms and CPP changes. search
10 “It was a proposal that cost less than a $1 million a year” One of the Conservative family proposals would cost less than $1 million a year. search