Discussion · Government Orders

David McGuinty Liberal

“Victims should not have to choose between military and civilian courts. Making them choose is unfair, especially when military leaders might interfere in a military court case.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “Asking victims and survivors to choose between two unequal options, one of which has the potential for chain-of-command interference, in a Criminal Code case does not provide victims with clarity, transparency or certainty.”

    Said 3 times by 2 members since May 4.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will repeat myself in French for my colleague’s benefit. Victims and survivors deserve legal clarity, transparency and trust in the process. Justice Arbour herself described a victim’s choice between military and civilian courts as a false choice. I want to emphasize the word “false”. Indeed, that would amount to placing a burden on the victim of having to choose between two unequal options, all at a time of stress and trauma. Ultimately, asking victims and survivors to choose between two unequal options, one of which has the potential for chain-of-command interference, in a Criminal Code case does not provide victims with clarity, transparency or certainty.

No comments yet.

Comment rules