Discussion · Government Orders
Stephanie Kusie Conservative
“This new bill changes this role into a minister, unlike the last version. The Liberals did this to give themselves more power to act on their own without checks and balances.”
“Mr. Speaker, I want to recognize the excellent work of our defence team, in addition to our associate defence minister for procurement, who has done a fantastic job in addition to the work of our shadow minister for defence. The answer is clear. I will point out the change between Bill C-31 and Bill C-40. In Bill C-31, this position was not a minister, but was made so in Bill C-40. The reasoning is clear. The Liberals want more power for themselves. They want the ability to do things unilaterally without having the checks and balances in place. It is no surprise to me at all. The good issue that my colleague has raised is a question of control.”
-
Reply to a debate question
Relevance 41 of 100
None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
See full analysis -
Reply to a debate question
Signal 23 of 100
Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
See full analysis
Mr. Speaker, I want to recognize the excellent work of our defence team, in addition to our associate defence minister for procurement, who has done a fantastic job in addition to the work of our shadow minister for defence. The answer is clear. I will point out the change between Bill C-31 and Bill C-40. In Bill C-31, this position was not a minister, but was made so in Bill C-40. The reasoning is clear. The Liberals want more power for themselves. They want the ability to do things unilaterally without having the checks and balances in place. It is no surprise to me at all. The good issue that my colleague has raised is a question of control.