Adjournment Proceedings

This debate focused on rising food prices and the broader cost of living. Conservative members argued that grocery bills continue to increase at an inflationary rate that exceeds general inflation and questioned how the government intended for its billion-dollar food fund to lower costs. The Liberal government responded by asserting that high energy prices are driving inflation and stated they are addressing the issue with a $3.2 billion fund dedicated to improving local food infrastructure and supporting community programs. Members debated whether systemic infrastructure changes or direct government interventions were the most effective way to stabilize food prices.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Tamara Kronis, Nanaimo—Ladysmith

Conservative
“Grocery prices are still too high, and more people are using food banks. Sending cheques does not fix the real costs of growing and moving food. The government is spending one billion dollars on a food fund, but it has no clear goals. I want the government to report publicly on whether this fund lowers food shipping costs, and I want to know which federal costs it will cut to make food cheaper.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, on May 1, I asked how many food bank expansions the Liberal government needed to see before it would bring grocery bills down. The minister responded by citing the Canada groceries and essentials benefit and temporary fuel tax relief. Well, those measures do not seem to have helped. Nearly six months later, families in my community still need an answer about the price of food. Last week, Food Banks Canada released its latest “Hungercount Report”. It recorded more than 2.35 million food bank visits in March of this year, which is more than double the number in 2019 and up 9% since last year across the country. In B.C., visits rose by 14% compared to the previous March. Behind those numbers are people who are struggling to make their paycheques, pensions and disability benefits cover the essentials. The latest Statistics Canada figures show that grocery prices are 33% higher than they were in September 2020. Of course, the wages and benefits have not kept up with that increase. I recognize that the grocery benefit does help eligible households, that fuel tax relief has been extended as Conservatives requested and that people do need that breathing room, but the government has to explain how it will reduce the underlying costs of getting food onto the shelves. The answer cannot be a never-ending stream of cheques and an ever-lengthening lineup at food banks. For Vancouver Island, that means working with us on improving the infrastructure that supports our supply chains and paying attention to freight, cold storage and distribution. It also means making it easy for local farmers and independent grocers to reach customers. It means removing unnecessary federal costs and barriers, while protecting food safety and strengthening competition. The government has now opened applications for its $1 billion food-link fund. It says that this will improve distribution and lower food costs. Given the ineffectiveness of earlier measures, I would feel better if we had clear deadlines and measurable results. Will the parliamentary secretary commit tonight to public reporting on whether the fund meets its approval deadlines when projects begin operating and whether they lower distribution costs for island communities? Beyond that fund, which federal costs will the government remove to make producing and transporting food more affordable? A $1-billion commitment deserves a clear accounting of what it will deliver. Families should be able to judge the results at the grocery store. The government owes all Canadians a plan that reduces the need for that help. Once again, we find that these plans are short on details in many ways. They are short on key performance indicators, and we lack confidence that they will produce measurable results. When will families in Nanaimo—Ladysmith and across this country finally see lasting relief in their grocery bills?

Tamara Kronis, Nanaimo—Ladysmith

Conservative
“Food prices are rising faster than general inflation, and more people are using food banks. The government creates programs without clear goals to measure success. I want to know how this billion-dollar fund will lower costs, by how much, and by when.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I was glad to hear the parliamentary secretary acknowledge the drivers behind some of the increases in the consumer price index in this country, the CPI, but the reality is that the price of food continues to grow at an inflationary rate that exceeds the CPI. The government comes up with program after program, yet there is a lack of measurables, KPIs and clear targets they can be measured against. Given that in the parliamentary secretary’s own community demand has become so intense that last year there had to be incredible expansion in the number of slots, my question is this: How will these programs work, by how much and by when, and how will Canadians know that this billion-dollar fund actually lowered their costs?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 157

  1. Oral Questions Finance 12 statements
  2. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 6 statements
  3. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Affairs 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 10 statements
  6. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 13 statements
  7. Oral Questions Natural Resources 6 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  9. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Parks Canada 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Taxation 8 statements
  13. Private Members' Business Points of Order 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  15. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 23 statements
  16. Private Members' Business Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act 7 statements
  17. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 202 statements
  18. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  19. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements