Intergovernmental Relations

During question period on intergovernmental relations, the Bloc Québécois raised Quebec’s role on the international stage. The member pointed to the Gérin-Lajoie doctrine, which has guided Quebec’s international relations in its own areas of jurisdiction for over 60 years, said senior Global Affairs officials did not know it, and cited a federal refusal to let a Quebec representative speak at the Canada-European Union summit as evidence that Canada does not respect Quebec’s prerogatives. The Liberal minister replied that Quebec is a distinct nation within a strong Canada, that the government recognizes Quebec’s unique economic and cultural interests, and noted that Montreal hosting the summit reflects Quebec’s role, adding that the government works closely with provinces and territories on international matters.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe, Lac-Saint-Jean

Bloc Québécois
“The Premier of Quebec has a right to represent our province abroad. Top federal foreign affairs officials do not even know the policy that has guided Quebec's work with other countries for 60 years. The federal government is completely out of touch with Quebec.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, no one should be surprised to see the Premier of Quebec asserting his role on the international stage. Yesterday, I asked the most senior officials at Global Affairs Canada whether they were familiar with the Gérin-Lajoie doctrine. Not one of them could tell me what it was. It has been the cornerstone of Quebec’s international relations policy for over 60 years, yet Ottawa has never heard of it. How is it possible that the federal bureaucracy has become so out of touch with Quebec?

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe, Lac-Saint-Jean

Bloc Québécois
“Quebec has handled its own international relations in its own areas for over 60 years. Canada does not respect this. Canada showed this by refusing to let Mr. St-Pierre Plamondon speak at the Canada-European Union summit. The federal government does not even know Quebec's rights anymore. This proves Canada does not understand Quebec and cannot speak for us.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, for over 60 years, Quebec has conducted its own international relations in areas under its jurisdiction. It has been doing so for more than 60 years. However, it is clear that Canada does not respect Quebec’s prerogatives, as illustrated by Canada’s refusal to let Mr. St-Pierre Plamondon speak at the Canada-European Union summit. That is not even the worst of it. The federal government is no longer even aware of Quebec’s prerogatives. This strikes me as the ultimate proof that Canada does not understand our nation and cannot speak for us. Is that not true?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 158

  1. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 38 statements
  2. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 81 statements
  3. Oral Questions International Trade 18 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions Justice 8 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 8 statements
  9. Oral Questions Government Appointments 5 statements
  10. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 7 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 23 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 42 statements
  20. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  22. Oral Questions Families, Children and Social Development 2 statements
  23. Private Members' Business National Strategy for Soil Health Act 16 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements