Public Services and Procurement

During question period on public services and procurement, the Conservatives asked about a $2.3-billion government contract with the satellite company Telesat, whose CEO is described as a close friend of the Prime Minister. They asked why the Prime Minister has not set up the same ethics measures another minister used to avoid dealings with that CEO. The government replied that the Prime Minister, like all ministers, members and senior officials, is subject to strict ethics rules, files declarations regularly, and that these standards should continue to be followed.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Jamil Jivani, Bowmanville—Oshawa North

Conservative

Linked statement

“The government gave a $2.3-billion contract to Telesat. Its CEO is a close friend of the Prime Minister. Another minister set up an ethics rule to avoid dealing with this CEO, but the Prime Minister has not done the same. I want to know why his ethics rules are incomplete and when he will fix them.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canadians have questions about the $2.3-billion contract given out to Telesat. Its CEO, Dan Goldberg, is close personal friends with the Prime Minister. Liberals were deflecting questions about this earlier today, but the core question is this: Why is the AI minister including Dan Goldberg in his ethics screen but the Prime Minister is unwilling to do the exact same? Canadians want to know why the Prime Minister’s ethics screen is incomplete, and when it is going to be fixed.

Steven MacKinnon, Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The Prime Minister, ministers, and members of Parliament must follow very strict ethics rules. We file ethics forms regularly and check them carefully. I want everyone here to keep following these high standards.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister, like all ministers, all members of the House and all senior officials throughout the government, must live under some of the most stringent ethics rules in the world. Declarations are filed regularly. Much attention is paid to making sure of the exactitude of all of these documents, and I would encourage all members of the House and all senior members of the government to continue to rigorously adhere to these very high standards.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 162

  1. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  2. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Publics Services and Procurement 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 11 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions International Trade 6 statements
  8. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Emergency Management 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Artificial Intelligence 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions National Defence 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 14 statements
  17. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  19. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 4 statements
  20. Private Members' Business Wartime Service Recognition Act 12 statements
  21. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 31 statements
  22. Government Orders Medical Assistance in Dying Safeguards Act 177 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements