MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

David Myles

Follow by RSS

Myles defends government funding of over $770 million for the cultural sector and pushes back against critics who call streaming levies an “imaginary tax.” He frequently avoids direct questions by refocusing on historical commitments, often stating, “they seem to be forgetting the historic investments we made in budget 2025, including more than $700 million for the cultural sector.”Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B
77 / 100 over 18 statements
Signal 70 / 100
Relevance 72 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 80 / 100
Loses points more than most for Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.1.9 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.9 A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.1.9 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.9 Loses points less than most for Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 18 of 25 statements graded so far.

Statements 25

Oral Questions ·

Taxation

In response to a question from Rachael Thomas

“These taxes are not real. People stream shows now instead of just watching TV, and our rules need to match how people watch things today.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, again, what we are talking about here are imaginary taxes. Once again, the way that Canadians consume content over the last decade has changed entirely. People are streaming content. It is not only with broadcasters. It is important that our regulatory regime reflect that change.

In response to a question from Rachael Thomas

“This is not a new tax. Our government cut taxes for 22 million Canadians to help with the cost of living. This decision just applies existing rules fairly to protect Canadian culture.”
  • A repeated line

    “We cut taxes for 22 million Canadians.”

    Said 17 times by 12 members since April 27.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, let me be very clear, this is not a new tax. This is an imaginary tax, once again brought up in the House. Our government is relentlessly focused on the cost of living for Canadians. That is why we cut taxes for 22 million Canadians. This decision from the CRTC only ensures that existing rules are applied in a way that fosters fair competition. This is about protecting Canada’s distinct culture and identity, and ensuring the vitality of our cultural sectors.

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Identity and Culture

In response to a question from Alexandre Boulerice

“Our government is investing over $700 million into culture in Canada and Quebec. We are doing this because strong culture makes our country strong.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank the member opposite for his question. I am proud to be part of a government that clearly understands the connection between a strong cultural sector and a strong, sovereign country. That is why we have made huge investments of over $700 million in the Canadian and Quebec cultural sector in budget 2025.

Statements by Members ·

Retirement Congratulations

“I want to congratulate firefighter David Gamble on his retirement after 37 years of service.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate firefighter David Gamble on his retirement from the Oromocto Fire Department after 37 years of service. Mr. Gamble has always had a reputation for doing things the right way. His uniform was meticulous, his tools were clean, his gear was organized, and 7:30 a.m. meant radio check time, no exceptions. According to his colleagues, it was largely thanks to his consistency and attention to detail that he was so dependable and trustworthy at work. Mr. Gamble demonstrated an old-fashioned work ethic in everything he did. His colleagues are not the only ones who have recognized his commitment to the job. In 2010, the Governor General awarded him with a Fire Services Exemplary Service Medal. Now, it is our turn to applaud his exceptional contribution. Please join me in thanking firefighter David Gamble for his dedication and professionalism over the past 37 years.

Oral Questions ·

Finance

In response to a question from Chris Lewis

“The opposition claims our military spending causes inflation. I support this spending because it helps the people who protect our country.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I have to ask myself what the opposition considers inflationary spending. For instance, yesterday, I heard a member opposite refer to our defence investments as if they were not important, as if they were all inflationary spending. I will tell members that when I am in Oromocto, when I am in Fredericton, at Base Gagetown, they do not see these as inflationary spending. They see these as important investments in the people who serve our country and protect our sovereignty. I applaud it. They applaud it. Unfortunately, the opposition votes against—