MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Dominique Vien

Follow by RSS

Vien advocates for a Conservative economic action plan, proposing $150 billion in spending cuts and establishing national coordination against violence against women. She often jumps to a conclusion the reasons don’t support, arguing that “unfortunately, many Canadian families will have to settle for a simpler meal.” She also sponsored Bill S-242 to address domestic violence.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A
91 / 100 over 24 statements
Signal 82 / 100
Relevance 76 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 96 / 100
Averaged over the 24 of 27 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Loses points more than most for

Loses points less than most for Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.Less often than most members.What the tags mean A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.Less often than most members.What the tags mean

Statements 27

Oral Questions ·

Finance

“The Bank of Canada says our economy is failing. Growth is stuck at 1%, which is far behind the rest of the world, and people cannot find jobs. The government must stop raising taxes and use our plan to create good jobs.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am quoting the Bank of Canada, which is confirming the Liberal government’s failure on the economy. Our growth has plateaued at 1%, which is less than half the rate in the United States and barely one-third of the global growth rate of 3.1%. Worse still, half of this result comes from government spending alone. According to the Bank of Canada, “Finding work continues to be challenging”. This situation is untenable, especially in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis. When will the government stop adding to the tax burden and adopt our Conservative plan to create stable, well-paying jobs?

“The Bank of Canada says inflation will stay above 3% until the end of 2027. Raising the fuel tax will push inflation even higher and hurt families and farmers. When will the government stop making choices that drive up the cost of living?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Bank of Canada says inflation is going to remain high and exceed 3% until the end of 2027. As a result, the cost of living will continue to rise, putting even more pressure on Canadian families and farmers. Furthermore, the government intends to increase the federal fuel excise tax. The bank itself admits that this increase will drive up inflation. This is completely irresponsible. When will the government put an end to its inflationary decisions that are driving up the cost of living?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Canadians cannot afford groceries, and food bank use is up 30% since 2019 under this government. I want the government to adopt our plan to lower grocery bills by removing all federal taxes on diesel.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, may I remind the House that, just this week, the Liberals refused to acknowledge the cost of living crisis? A 67-year-old woman in my community has been forced to take house cleaning jobs 25 minutes away from home. She cannot afford winter tires or groceries. Food bank usage has increased by 30% nationwide since 2019. Who was in power then? It was the Liberals. Will the government adopt our Conservative plan to lower grocery bills by eliminating all federal taxes on diesel?

“Quebec food banks are overwhelmed, and more families cannot afford basic needs. I want the government to adopt our plan to remove taxes on diesel.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Quebec’s food banks are overwhelmed. They are now handling a record number of requests for food assistance—more than three million every month. That is a 44% increase over the past five years. One in three children relies on food banks. Vulnerable households now spend 112% of their disposable income just on food, housing and transportation. Will this government adopt our plan to scrap taxes on diesel? It is very simple.

Private Members' Business ·

Georgina's Law

In response to a question from Kelly DeRidder

“We need national coordination to stop violence against women. Partners from every province should meet to see what works and share the best programs across Canada.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this is a national initiative designed to bring together all the partners from across Canada, from every province, to sit down and discuss the situation. We need a clear picture of the current situation. We need to approach this issue objectively. What programs are in place? How is violence against women being addressed? Are there initiatives in the west, the Maritimes, Quebec, Ontario or elsewhere that have proven effective and could be replicated in other regions? It really is about establishing national coordination to ensure that we are all working from a common understanding and pursuing shared objectives in addressing violence against women.

In response to a question from Andréanne Larouche

“I support this bill. It creates a national plan to stop violence against women. Passing it into law will make sure the plan lasts, no matter which political party is in power.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Senator Manning’s initiative is very much in keeping with the various measures that can be undertaken, be they strategies, national initiatives or legislation. In this case, we have legislation that provides a framework for a national effort to prevent violence against women. I commend the Government of Canada for having put that effort in place. Senator Manning called for it, and that request has been answered. Now comes a second request: that this national effort survive the various governments that eventually sit on the other side, regardless of which party sits on the government side. The aim is precisely to ensure that this strategy has staying power. I think that is the goal: to reach the kind of consensus that will bring about real change.

In response to a question from Jessica Fancy

“All parties should work together on this bill instead of fighting. Our goal must be to keep women safe.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 41 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, some issues call for co-operation. By their very nature, they do not lend themselves to partisan debate or political point-scoring. This year marks 20 years since I entered politics. On several occasions, I have seen parliamentarians recognize that certain issues simply cannot be subjected to partisan battles. There are indeed several bills in the works. People listening to us at home will be happy to hear that, in committees or in other areas of Parliament, we are able to engage in parliamentary debate, reach agreement, and be on the same page. I am convinced that, when it comes to this particular bill, we will be able to work hand in hand, because ultimately, the goal is to ensure that when women wake up in the morning, they wake up happy and safe, and that, when they go to bed at night, they remain safe.

“I want the House to pass this bill and send it to committee. Violence against women is a national crisis. This bill requires the federal government to work with provinces and Indigenous partners each year to stop partner violence, and report its progress to Parliament every two years.”
Official Hansard

moved that Bill S-242, An Act respecting national action for the prevention of intimate partner violence, be read the second time and referred to a committee. She said: Mr. Speaker, we have discussed some very poignant issues today, social issues that affect us all. I would like to add another point this evening. I am going to address a subject that is sensitive, difficult to hear and, of course, difficult to describe. I will be talking about violence against women, particularly violence against women in the context of domestic violence, which is becoming increasingly common. Even one incident is one too many. All too often, this violence claims its victim’s life. Despite the sensitive nature of the subject, I am pleased to rise today as the sponsor in the House of Commons of Bill S‑242, introduced by Senator Fabian Manning, who is close by here this evening. My hope is that everything we do as politicians will help build a safer society for our women and girls. We must break the silence surrounding this violence. We must strip this violence of the shame that often falls over the victims, and cast it over to the other side, as we learned from a French woman who was a victim herself, who is known for her immense courage. This is Mr. Manning’s third attempt to get a bill passed that would require the federal government and all provincial governments to stand shoulder to shoulder, with better coordination nationwide, in addressing violence against women. The idea of introducing this bill came to him after a meeting with Georgina McGrath, a Newfoundlander who survived many years of domestic violence. Georgina’s story is the product of a system that fails to protect our women and girls, a system that sadly appears to protect abusers more than the victims, whose numbers are constantly rising to frightening levels. I will share some statistics that illustrate my point. Here in Canada, the surge in violent crime since 2015 has been alarming. Overall, violent crime has increased by 57%. Firearm-related crime, in particular, has risen by 103% since 2015. Extortion, meanwhile, has increased by 300% over the same period. Homicides are up by nearly 10% since 2015. Intimate partner and gender-based violence is usually directed at women. It can be physical, psychological or sexual in nature. Since 2015, sexual assaults in this country have surged by 74%. The reality of sexual violence and abuse against young women is that over six in 10 women aged 15 to 24, or 61%, experienced unwanted sexual behaviour in a public place, the highest rate of any age group. To fully grasp the gravity of the situation, and the national crisis we are facing when it comes to violence against women, we need only consider that, since the start of this year, some 19 femicides have reportedly been committed in Quebec alone. According to the Canadian Femicide Observatory for Justice and Accountability, 147 women and girls were violently killed across the country last year. The Government of Canada even states plainly on its own website that, in this country, a G7 nation, a woman is killed every 48 hours. Is anyone paying attention? Is anyone not turning a blind eye? Is anyone not simply moving on, convinced that there are more pressing matters to address? We must act because the next victim is alive tonight. She is still alive. In the section on 16 days of activism against gender-based violence, which will be held from November 25 to December 10, we note that a woman is killed every two days in Canada. The Government of Canada’s website states: GBV [gender-based violence] continues to affect women, girls, and 2SLGBTQI+ communities at alarming rates. Every 48 hours in Canada, a woman or girl is killed in an act of gender-based violence. In 2024, 240 women and girls were murdered, primarily by men, a 54% increase over pre-COVID rates. Victims and survivors of GBV often face lasting personal, social, and economic impacts with consequences that can echo across generations. GBV carries a high economic cost, with Canadian governments spending billions annually on healthcare, justice, and social services to respond to it. I will now share some more numbers that show that women are right to be constantly hypervigilant, which, of course, is not normal. The number of female victims of police-reported domestic violence is up 39%. Since 2018, intimate partner violence has increased by 14% nation-wide. Furthermore, in Canada, 28% of all violent crimes are committed by an intimate partner. This represents nearly one in three crimes. Lastly, 79% of victims of intimate partner homicide are women. That is why Senator Manning wants all governments in Canada to sit down together and coordinate their actions. The senator has long called on the government to implement a national plan to address intimate partner violence. Since this plan now exists, he is now asking, through this bill, for the federal government to support this national strategy and show leadership by sitting down at the same table with all the provincial governments to develop a clear vision of the situation and take joint action to address violence against women. Georgina’s Law contains four sections and sets out the following for the Minister of Women and Gender Equality to consider. First, it says that the “Minister must continue to lead national action to prevent and address intimate partner violence.” What is interesting is the ongoing nature the wording of the bill adds to any national action or strategy. The government can call it whatever it wants. The goal here is a national initiative that will outlast all governments. Second, it states that the Minister of Women and Gender Equality must “engage annually with other federal ministers and with provincial ministers responsible for the status of women and regularly with Indigenous partners, victims and survivors, and stakeholders with respect to: (a) the adequacy of current programs and strategies aimed at preventing intimate partner violence and at protecting and assisting victims of intimate partner violence”. We want to ensure that the measures put forward are effective and provide an appropriate response to any situation involving violence. Allow me to continue: “(b) partnerships in the prevention of intimate partner violence and the protection of victims of intimate partner violence”. The idea is that ministers across Canada will discuss “the financial and other costs of action to prevent and address intimate partner violence”. Finally, of course, discussions must be held on “any constitutional, legal or jurisdictional implications of action to prevent and address intimate partner violence.” The bill also states that “the engagements...must begin within one year after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.” Of course, we hope that it will be adopted as soon as possible. With respect to accountability, as this is an important element, the bill provides that, within two years of the day on which the bill receives royal assent and every two years thereafter, the minister must prepare a report setting out progress on national action to prevent and address intimate partner violence. That report must then be tabled in each House of Parliament. In other words, is it possible to share our best practices? Could we not avoid reinventing the wheel and improve how we talk to each other? Let us talk about Georgina’s law for Georgina McGrath. This woman knew cowardly men who beat her. The last one that fit this profile almost killed her. The following is an excerpt from her testimony in the Senate on April 11, 2024. I need to give a little warning, because it is not easy to hear. The mental and emotional abuse followed hand in hand with the physical abuse. Everything was my fault, of course, and I was crazy for questioning him on anything. His reign of terror continued over the next few months. I had black eyes, a broken-off tooth, a concussion and a tiring amount of emotional and mental abuse. Later in her testimony, she went on to say the following: On September 25, 2014, I received the biggest beating of my life.... He...started strangling me.... He...started punching me on the side of my head.... I just lay there waiting for the final punch. That day she managed to reach her sister. After attempting to commit suicide, in the end, thankfully she woke up in the hospital. She continued by telling the senator the following: The next thing I remember is waking in the hospital and seeing my two children. That’s when I knew I was in for the fight of my life. I had ruptured ear drums, temporal and facial damages and bruises all over my body that took seven weeks to fade away. These women, like Georgina, are broken inside. They will bear the scars for the rest of their lives. They are forever marked by these experiences. Georgina McGrath encouraged Conservative Senator Fabian Manning to take action. This is a relay race. Now, it is up to us to take the baton and say yes to Mr. Manning, yes to Georgina and yes to all the women who do not feel safe and who fear for their lives. This evening, we need to say yes to them. Let us also do our part and pass this bill, which is a reasonable, common-sense piece of legislation. I think that the Liberals, the Bloc Québécois, and the New Democrats can easily join me and the Conservatives in supporting this bill without hesitation. Let us take inspiration from the bipartisan consensus among the three provincial parties in Newfoundland and Labrador that support this initiative. Let us take inspiration from the National Assembly of Quebec, which unanimously passed the Gabie Renaud Act in a bipartisan effort in June 2026.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“The government's plan is not working. Groceries are too expensive, and families have to cut back because they have no money. I blame the Liberals for this, and I want the government to admit that Canada is in an affordability crisis.”
  • A repeated line

    “Clearly, the plan is not working.”

    Said 4 times by 4 members since May 8.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, those are just empty words. The government’s plan is not working. It will take approximately $150 in groceries to feed eight people, and that is not counting all the extras that people have come to expect, like appetizers and drinks. Unfortunately, many Canadian families will have to settle for a simpler meal because they do not have any money. That is the result of 11 years of Liberal mismanagement. Our motion before the House today makes that very clear. Will the government admit that, after 11 years of Liberal governance, Canada is officially in the midst of an affordability crisis?

“Thanksgiving dinner will cost 10% more this year, making family meals too expensive for many people. Our motion addresses the high cost of groceries. Will the government admit that Canada is in a cost-of-living crisis after 11 years of Liberal rule?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, next week, families will gather to celebrate Thanksgiving. However, according to studies, the cost of that traditional meal will be 10% higher than it was last year. For far too many Canadians, simply gathering around the table with family is becoming a luxury. That is why our party has brought forward a motion, which is being debated today, to recognize the reality that these families face every time they go to the grocery store. Does the government acknowledge that, after 11 years of Liberal rule, Canada is officially in the midst of a cost-of-living crisis?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“High diesel prices hurt farmers and make groceries cost more for families. Canada has plenty of oil, but we still pay more for fuel than most countries. I want the government to use our plan to lower fuel prices.”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada has the fourth-largest oil reserves in the world.”

    Said 8 times by 7 members since October 5.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, one farmer is sounding the alarm: Rising diesel prices are forcing him to pay an extra $2,000 a day to run his equipment. When our business owners pay more because of Liberal taxes, families everywhere feel the pinch at the grocery store. Everyone knows that. Canada has the fourth-largest oil reserves in the world, yet Canadians pay more per litre of diesel than the global average. Will the Liberals adopt our emergency plan to bring down prices at the pump?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Government taxes and spending are driving up the cost of living, and parents are skipping meals to feed their kids. We can save $150 billion by cutting red tape and return nearly $10,000 to every family. I want the government to adopt our economic plan so families can afford food.”
Official Hansard

Sadly, Mr. Speaker, that is not working. Families are stretched to the limit. Parents are now skipping meals so their kids can eat. This all because of the government’s taxes and out-of-control spending, which are driving up the cost of living. We have identified $150 billion that could be saved by cutting red tape. This could give nearly $10,000 back to every family. Once again, will the Liberals adopt our Conservative economic action plan so that these parents can finally afford to put food on the table for their families?

“People in Quebec cannot afford their basic living costs. I want the government to adopt the Conservative economic plan to help families pay for rent, food, and baby supplies.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals have lost touch with reality. Quebeckers’ pockets are empty. In Bellechasse, a young mother without child care services is forced to stay home, living on a fraction of her income, and leaving her partner to pay all the bills. Paying $1,200 in rent along with groceries, gas and baby care essentials is becoming a major headache for them. Will the Liberals adopt our Conservative economic action plan so that this young mother can finally afford to meet her family’s needs?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Life costs too much. I want the government to get rid of the carbon tax on business and use our plan instead. We would cut rules and consultants to save families $10,000 each.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague has been very clear. What we want on this side of the House is to leave money in Canadians’ pockets. The plan the Conservatives are proposing involves savings of $150 billion. That is $10,000 per family. How do we do that? It is by cutting down on red tape and consultants. Given the soaring cost of living, will the Liberal government finally scrap the industrial carbon tax and adopt our Conservative economic action plan?

Oral Questions ·

Access to Information

“Last week, the President of the Treasury Board could not answer a simple question. Does he believe the Prime Minister still has confidence in him?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals are totally out of touch, but I want to raise a different topic. Last week, the President of the Treasury Board was unable to answer a simple question from my colleague. That embarrassed his government and, according to La Presse, angered his fellow Liberal MPs. He has had all weekend to recover and find the right page in his briefing book. Does he believe he still has the Prime Minister’s confidence? I will give him a few seconds to find the answer in his briefing book.

Oral Questions ·

Seniors

“The government has made new rules that make it harder for volunteer groups to get money for seniors. Groups now have to wait months to get a business number and use a hard online system. I want the government to drop these rules.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as we mark World Elder Abuse Awareness Day today, the Liberal government is standing in the way of organizations that support seniors. The new rules for the New Horizons for Seniors program are forcing volunteer groups to get a business number from the Canada Revenue Agency. This process can take months and also requires them to navigate an online application system. These organizations want to help seniors, not fight Ottawa’s bureaucracy. Is the government going to back down on these bureaucratic reforms? Yes, we know the people in our ridings.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“The government's poor management has caused a recession, and more Canadians are living in poverty. I want the Prime Minister to reverse his costly policies so people can get ahead.”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada is the only G20 country in a recession.”

    Said 104 times by 61 members since May 29.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as my colleague said, a United Way survey confirms that this government is a disaster, as 60% of Canadians are feeling financial anxiety and 22% of Canadians have personally experienced poverty, compared to 19% last year. Under this Prime Minister, Canada is the only G20 country in a recession, and it is because of this government’s mismanagement. We have said it before and we will say it again. When will the Prime Minister finally reverse his costly policies so Canadians can finally get ahead financially?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Canada's economy is shrinking, and the government is borrowing 72 billion dollars this year. I want the Prime Minister to admit that our country is in a recession.”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada is the only G20 country in a recession.”

    Said 104 times by 61 members since May 29.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, under this Prime Minister, Canada is the only G20 country in a recession. This comes as no surprise. We have experienced three out of four quarters of negative growth. We are seeing a record decline in productivity. The public finance watchdog confirms that there is a 99% probability that the government will fall short of its fiscal anchor. Despite repeated warnings from the banks, this government continues to run up the debt. It will borrow $72 billion this year. Will the Prime Minister finally stop denying the obvious and admit to Canadians that our economy is indeed in a recession?

Private Members' Business ·

Old Age Security Act

“I support this bill. The government raised pensions by 10% for seniors 75 and older, but left out seniors aged 65 to 74. This bill gives them that same 10% raise to help with high living costs. It also lets working seniors keep more of their money before their benefits are cut.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to rise, as we were not sure I would have enough time. I would like to thank my two colleagues from the Bloc Québécois, who spoke so eloquently, as well as my colleague from King—Vaughan, who gave a really poignant speech about seniors. She is able to do so because she travels around many ridings. As the Conservative Party of Canada’s critic for seniors, she is well aware of everything to do with seniors and what affects them, especially when it comes to the cost of living. I think that, in the House, we all have an opportunity in front of us. As members of Parliament, we have an opportunity to use our power to correct a situation that is hurting seniors aged 65 and over. I hope we all have enough dignity and foresight to show compassion and take action. The problem is very simple. In 2021, the Liberal government decided to take an important step, make a meaningful gesture, by increasing the pensions of seniors aged 75 and older by 10%. However, it stopped halfway. The government omitted a significant portion of seniors from its approach, namely people aged 65 to 74. They were completely excluded from this increase. That created inequity and an unusual situation. As parliamentarians, as people who meet with seniors all the time, we cannot allow this situation to continue. We absolutely must use this opportunity to fix this. Our Bloc Québécois colleagues tried to do so once. Everyone here agreed, except the Liberals. The bill died on the Order Paper because it required a royal recommendation, since it involved spending. My colleague worked tirelessly to reintroduce a bill. Since we are so stubborn, we decided to support it once again. We are giving our colleagues on the government side an opportunity to take action and get it right. Seniors are not asking for a handout. These are people who have worked hard all their lives, who have contributed to society and who, at age 65, need an income, especially during these very difficult times when the cost of living has skyrocketed to levels not seen in 40 years. While their fixed incomes remain the same, the cost of living continues to add to their headaches. Between paying for food, medication and housing, seniors can no longer make ends meet. What the bill says is that we will be fair and fix the situation. Someone somewhere made a mistake, and we are going to fix it. We will allow seniors aged 65 to 74 to receive the same increase, an increase of 10%, as was granted to seniors aged 75 and over in 2021. Another interesting approach in the bill is that it gives seniors who want to continue working the opportunity to do so without being penalized because their income is too high. That plays a role in determining the amount they can receive under the GIS. The bill tabled by Mrs. DeBellefeuille proposes an increase from $5,000 to $6,5000 to accurately reflect the situation of many seniors who decide to work. Some work because they have to in order to make ends meet. Others do so to keep up their spirits and stay in good health. Still, it is not right for the government to creep up from behind and take their money. I congratulate my colleague.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Rents and food prices have gone up too much. I want the government to stop spending so much money and fix the high cost of living right now.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this government’s housing and inflation crisis is tearing families apart. Rents have jumped 3.6% in one year. Since 2021, there has been a 31% increase. Today, food insecurity is so severe that some Canadians have to spend 120% of their income just to put food on the table or pay for housing. When is this Liberal government going to put an end to its costly, out-of-control budgets and finally take the cost-of-living crisis seriously? Now would be best.