MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Marc Miller

Follow by RSS

Miller defends federal spending on culture and the French language, pressing for money for CBC/Radio-Canada, Telefilm Canada and the National Film Board, $600 million a year for the cultural sector, and research in French, and he sponsors Bill C-34 to make social media platforms protect children online. In debate he forces opponents to choose between two options, asking “Which is it?” and “faster or slower?”, often drifting into asides like “I funded the poutine festival in his riding.”Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B–
74 / 100 over 33 statements
Signal 64 / 100
Relevance 65 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 89 / 100
Averaged over the 33 of 49 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Loses points more than most for

Loses points less than most for Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.Less often than most members.What the tags mean

Statements 49

Government Orders ·

Safe Social Media Act

In response to a question from Kevin Lamoureux

“I want the House to pass this bill. It protects children online. Doctors say they now treat kids harmed by social media every day instead of once a month.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for his advocacy in this matter, and I thank the member for Outremont, as well as members from across the way who have been engaging with citizens. I think there is cross-partisan support for this very targeted bill, which would be doing a very basic thing we need to do as elected officials: to protect our kids. I think that is key. If we cannot get it right, there is probably no reason for us to be here. Educators, SickKids in Toronto and Alberta Children’s Hospital have all been approaching us with the same concerns. If we talk to frontline workers, such as doctors who see kids in the emergency room, and this is gallows humour and everything, we hear that they want to see more broken bones as opposed to broken souls. It is really alarming to talk to doctors and hear them say that 10 years or 15 years ago, this was something they were seeing maybe on a monthly basis. They are now seeing it on a daily basis with their patients. I want to thank all the doctors and educators and all the people out there who have been advocating for this for some time and holding us to account. I also want to give a particular shout-out to the online protection group in Winnipeg that has been doing amazing work to flag all this garbage online and to make sure people are held to account and put in jail where that is merited.

In response to a question from Gabriel Ste-Marie

“This bill makes online platforms protect their users. It is an important first step, and it could help with some online fraud, especially against children. But it does not cover all fraud. We may need another bill to deal with fraud more fully.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that is a very good question. We need to be very clear about what the bill can and cannot necessarily cover. I think the issue of online fraud is of great concern to the House, particularly when it comes to the online experiences of our children and young people. Platforms have a duty of care. This is a first in Canada. I believe it could help address certain aspects of online fraud, but it is clear that we need a highly targeted approach in this area and we must ensure that platforms act responsibly. This is an important first step, but it does not represent the entirety of the debate. I am certain the House will want to continue examining the issue of online fraud, and it may do so through another, more comprehensive bill.

In response to a question from Rachael Thomas

“I want this bill to pass. We need a regulator to set rules that stop harm to kids before it happens, instead of punishing people after the damage is done. The committee can debate what those rules should be and who should set them.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think an important feature to keep kids safe before the harm occurs, as opposed to prosecuting once the damage has occurred, is to make sure we have a regulator in place that can put together precisely these guidelines. I will admit that this bar would be quite high and that there is probably a legitimate debate to be had here and in committee as to what those regulations would be and whether they would be determined by the regulator or perhaps even by committee. Obviously, in the conception of a regulatory platform, regulation should not necessarily be debated in the House on every item. I think that is a careful balance we are willing to consider.

“I want the House to pass this bill to protect children online. Harm to kids on the internet is rising fast. The bill makes social media companies and AI chatbots responsible for keeping users safe. It requires them to take down the worst harmful material within 24 hours, use age checks, and keep kids under 16 off social media unless the platform proves it is safe.”
  • A repeated line

    “First is a duty to act responsibly.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since October 21.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to rise today on Bill C-34, the safe social media act. Upon taking office, the Prime Minister pledged to protect and strengthen Canada, and that is what we are doing today. We have also remained focused on ensuring that as Canadians, we take control of our own destiny, protect what we believe in and pave the way for future generations. That starts with keeping Canadians safe, not only in their communities but online. Today, I am here to reaffirm our government’s unwavering commitment to protecting Canadians and, in particular, young Canadians. We have all seen how online harms have exploded. These harms have real consequences for our communities. We need only think of the Tumbler Ridge tragedy, which claimed eight lives, including six children, and left many more injured. The perpetrator of the shooting used OpenAI’s chatbot to get advice. Another example is the young person who was admitted to Toronto’s SickKids hospital in a catatonic state after classmates set up a site just to humiliate them. The Canadian Centre for Child Protection processes more than 100,000 reports of online child sexual abuse every month. Police-reported online child sexual exploitation incidents rose by 347% between 2014 and 2024 alone. Violent online networks are targeting our children on the platforms they use every day, encouraging them to hurt themselves or even take their own lives. If this activity happened on the playground, the playground would be shut down immediately. One in four young people say they have been cyberbullied. This represents a 500% increase since 2014. We are also witnessing a rise in mental health challenges, including anxiety, low self-esteem and suicidal thoughts. These figures are alarming. Behind every one of these statistics is a child, parents and a family. Over the summer, my colleagues on this side of the House and on the other side of the House and I met with Canadians, experts, parents and young people. Everywhere we went, we heard the same message: We need to act, and we need to act urgently. Parents, teachers and caregivers cannot be expected to face these challenges alone, nor can they be expected to take on some of the world’s most sophisticated technology companies by themselves. Urgent action is needed to hold online services accountable and to ensure that our children are safe on the platforms they are growing up with. The reality is that our laws have not kept up and kept pace with technology. Current legislation imposes penalties only after the harm has occurred, rather than preventing it in the first place. This bill, the safe social media act, would establish clear responsibilities for regulated social media services and AI chatbot services operating in Canada. It would place the onus where it belongs: on the platforms themselves. It would ensure their services are safe. This act is structured around three core duties. The first is a duty to act responsibly. Social media services would need to assess and mitigate the risks of exposure to seven categories of clear, harmful content, apply labels to synthetically generated content, build safety measures into the design of their platforms, make it easy for Canadians to report and submit complaints, and, finally, provide Canadians with better tools to keep themselves safe, such as blocking and flagging functions. AI chatbot services would have to mitigate the risk of chatbots communicating harmful content, intervene in crisis situations when a user intends to harm themselves or another person, and mitigate the risk of chatbots engaging in harmful behaviour with our children. Secondly, social media platforms would have a duty to make certain content inaccessible. Platforms would be required to remove the most serious forms of harmful content within 24 hours of it being flagged or reported. This includes content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor and intimate content communicated without consent. Third, the law would establish the duty to protect children. It would require social media and AI chatbot services to implement age-appropriate safeguards. This means building safety into the design of their services and ensuring that children are not exposed to high-risk interactions or harmful content. This includes an obligation for regulated services to prevent children from accessing pornographic content on their services. For regulated social media platforms, this would also mean having a responsibility to prevent children under the age of 16 from having social media accounts. This approach was requested by parents and educators almost unanimously. It is in line with the emerging international approaches to online safety, but this design is made for Canadians. We expect platforms to adopt age verification and age estimation measures that meet the highest standards of security and privacy protection. However, the age restriction is just one of the measures in this bill, because we know that the best way to protect young people is to design online spaces to be safe. That is why social media platforms that put sufficient safeguards in place will be able to seek an exemption from the age restriction. Finally, regulated services will need to be transparent with Canadians and publish digital safety plans detailing how they are meeting their obligations. We also recognize that Canadians deserve to know how their personal information is being used, shared and protected. That is why my colleague, the Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, introduced Bill C-36. It represents the most significant change to Canada’s private sector privacy law in over 25 years. This bill establishes clear guardrails to protect Canadians’ personal information, with a special focus on children’s personal information. Making Canadians safer online, enhancing platforms’ accountability and preventing online harms before they occur must be priorities for us and the House. The safe social media act would establish conditions necessary for the online services that shape our lives to operate responsibly and, importantly, transparently. It is designed to address current concerns while allowing us to keep pace with technological changes, which often outpace legislation. Finally, it would ensure that our children and Canadians can benefit from new technologies without compromising their safety and privacy. Canada has been falling behind, and we must ensure that Canadian youth are no less protected than young people elsewhere as our world becomes increasingly digital. We need to act now. Canadians expect action from the House, and we must deliver. I invite all members to give this bill serious consideration and engage in an open and constructive debate. Our children’s safety must be a shared priority that rises above partisan lines. I am committed to working with all members of the House to protect our children online.

“I want the House to advance this online safety bill and send it to a committee. I also want permission to split my speaking time with another member.”
Official Hansard

moved that Bill C-34, An Act to enact the Digital Safety Act and the Digital Safety Commission of Canada Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be read the second time and referred to a committee. He said: Mr. Speaker, I will start off by seeking unanimous consent to share my time with the member for Outremont.

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Identity and Culture

In response to a question from Martin Champoux

“I am not being partisan. My government even funded a festival in that member's riding. Our budget gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Canadian media, film, and music. Every Quebec Liberal voted for that money, and every Bloc Québécois member voted against it.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 31 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “$127.5 million for the Canada Media Fund.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since October 21.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is unfortunate that my colleague is accusing me of partisanship when I funded the poutine festival in his riding. I will read a short list. The 2025 budget allocated $150 million for CBC/Radio-Canada, $150 million for Telefilm Canada, $127 million for the Canada Media Fund, $48 million for the Canada Music Fund, $26 million for the National Film Board and an additional $600 million for the audiovisual sector. Two things are true about this list: Every Quebec member on this side of the House voted for it, and every member of the Bloc Québécois voted against it.

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Culture and Identity

In response to a question from Martin Champoux

“The Bloc Québécois complains that there is no money for culture. But our budget invests billions of dollars in culture, and the Bloc voted against it.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois is the only one complaining that there is no money for culture when its own members have done nothing when it comes time to invest and vote for our budget, which has allocated billions of dollars for culture.

In response to a question from Martin Champoux

“The money will arrive very soon.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I can assure the House and the sector that the money will come very soon.

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Identity and Culture

In response to a question from Fares Al Soud

“I signed film deals with the United Kingdom and Spain at the Toronto film festival. Deals like this bring about 500 million dollars into our economy. The government must keep supporting them to protect Canadian culture.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it was a real pleasure to be at TIFF over the last week and connect with creators from Canada and around the world. I had the opportunity to sign two co-production agreements: one with the United Kingdom and the other with Spain. This is part of a network of 60 agreements that we have around the world that generate about $500 million in our economy. They need the support of the Canadian government, but at the same time, it reinforces our cultural sovereignty, which we need to do now more than ever.

In response to a question from Martin Champoux

“Liberal MPs always vote to support culture in Quebec and Canada. Our government has spent more money on culture than any other government in Canadian history.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am very proud to be able to rise in the House, on our side of the House, to represent members, including about 50 from Quebec, who rise time and time again to vote for culture in Quebec and Canada, with historic investments that no other government has ever made in the history of Canada.

In response to a question from Martin Champoux

“We never said we would change the broadcasting law.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I can confirm to the House that we never said we would amend the Broadcasting Act.

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Identity and Culture

In response to a question from Martin Champoux

“The Bloc is wrong to say we are not investing in culture. Over the last two budgets, we have spent more than $2 billion on culture.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 19 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, only the Bloc Québécois could stand up in the House and exhibit such intellectual laziness by claiming that we are not investing in culture. Over the past two budget cycles, we have invested more than $2 billion in culture.

In response to a question from Martin Champoux

“Francophone culture and the French language are central to Canada, and we will protect them. Big tech companies must help people find and support our local artists.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 48 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 0 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, francophone culture and the French language are our identity, and we will never back down. When it comes to discoverability, the same applies to the web giants. They have a responsibility to help promote our local artists, without exception.

Oral Questions ·

Prime Minister of Canada

In response to a question from Christine Normandin

“We gave 1.3 billion dollars to culture, but the Bloc Québécois looks down on it. They come to Ottawa every day to break up Canada. I wish them a happy Saint-Jean-Baptiste Day and a happy Canada Day.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 14 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 13 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, our government allocated $1.3 billion to culture, yet the Bloc Québécois treats that with contempt. The real betrayal is a party that shows up in Ottawa every day to destroy my country. It is ridiculous. Since they are already in vacation mode, I wish them a happy Saint‑Jean‑Baptiste Day and a happy Canada Day.

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Identity and Culture

In response to a question from Michael Chong

“I know about these claims. Politicians should not tell museums what they can show.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, suffice it to say that I am aware of these allegations, but I think the member would join me in saying that it is not the place of the minister or any member of the House to dictate museum policy and what is curated and what is not.

Oral Questions ·

Indigenous Affairs

In response to a question from Gérard Deltell

“I ordered an investigation into this. I cannot talk about it here while that is going on.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 48 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as the hon. member is well aware, I have ordered an investigation. It would be inappropriate to comment on this matter in the House of Commons.

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Identity and Culture

In response to a question from Martin Champoux

“The National Film Board of Canada funded Mr. Falardeau.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would first like to thank the member opposite for the quality of his French. I would also like to point out that Mr. Falardeau was funded by the National Film Board of Canada.

In response to a question from Christine Normandin

“Our government is supporting arts and culture while the Bloc Québécois does nothing. We put $772 million into arts and culture in the last budget, announced another $600 million for culture, and spent $100 million to share Canadian and Quebec shows with the world.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to begin by thanking the member for reading her question with such conviction. While the Bloc Québécois spends its time loafing about, we are taking action. In the last budget, we invested $772 million in arts and culture. During my last press conference, I announced $600 million for culture, including Quebec culture. I almost forgot the $100 million that was invested in the creative export strategy, which allows programs like Empathie and TV5MONDE programs, which include Quebec television programs, to reach foreign audiences.

Oral Questions ·

Canadian Identity and Culture

In response to a question from Julie Dzerowicz

“It is Portuguese Heritage Month and Portugal Day. I want to celebrate Portuguese Canadians and the contributions they make to our country.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to start by wishing a happy Portuguese Heritage Month and a feliz Dia de Portugal, de Camões e das Comunidades Portuguesas to all Luso-Canadians. Since the 1950s, generations of Portuguese immigrants have come to Canada and today nearly half a million Canadians trace their roots to Portugal. Across every sector, Luso-Canadians continue to enrich our society through their hard work, talent and commitment to their communities, including in this House. It is a chance to reflect on the values that unite us and to celebrate the diversity that makes us strong.

In response to a question from Martin Champoux

“Our government is funding Quebec and Canadian culture, including $750 million in the budget for public broadcasters and film agencies. The Bloc Québécois does not get anything done and ignores the money we are spending.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 36 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, while the Bloc Québécois spends its fourth decade here in Ottawa getting absolutely nothing done, we are taking action. In the most recent budget, we invested $750 million in the National Film Board of Canada, CBC/Radio-Canada and Telefilm Canada. Now, Bloc members are turning their noses up at $600 million per year. They did not read the press release. We are taking action. We are investing in Quebec and Canadian culture.