MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Michael Ma

Follow by RSS

Ma advocates for reducing regulatory burdens on the transportation sector and reinforcing tax integrity through Bill S-217. He frequently argues by asserting shared certainty instead of providing a source, often stating phrases such as “It goes without saying.” He also makes commitments regarding national strength without naming a specific measure or date.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B+
81 / 100 over 6 statements
Signal 92 / 100
Relevance 69 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 80 / 100
Averaged over the 6 of 8 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Statements 8

Private Members' Business ·

Canada Revenue Agency Act

“The Canada Revenue Agency is already doing what this bill asks for. We already publish lists of people convicted of tax evasion, including offshore evasion. We also already calculate and publish reports on unpaid taxes, and our work has cut that unpaid amount by billions of dollars.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am thankful for the opportunity to speak about Bill S-217, an act to amend the Canada Revenue Agency Act, regarding reporting on unpaid income tax. Maintaining the integrity and fairness of the Canadian tax system is a priority for the Government of Canada. It goes without saying that we are fighting on all fronts against tax evasion and tax avoidance, both nationally and internationally. I want to emphasize that the tax gap estimate provides valuable information to the Government of Canada. The tax gap is the difference between the amount of taxes that taxpayers would have paid if they had fully met their tax obligations and the amount of taxes they actually reported and paid. By estimating the tax gap, we can get a clearer picture of tax non-compliance and a better understanding of the overall health of the Canadian tax system. It also plays a role in delivering on the government’s commitment to transparency. Understanding how and why taxpayers are non-compliant is critical to preserving the integrity of the tax system. It is vital to protecting Canada’s revenue base, which supports programs and benefits that improve the quality of life for all Canadians. That being said, we are here today to discuss Bill S-217, which proposes to amend the Canada Revenue Agency Act. Specifically, it would require the CRA to list all convictions for tax evasion, including international tax evasion, in the annual report submitted to the Minister of National Revenue. It also proposes that the CRA, once every three years, include statistics on the tax gap in the annual report. In addition, it further proposes that the minister provide data on the tax gap to the Parliamentary Budget Officer without delay. I would like to take this opportunity to welcome the appointment of Ms. Annette Ryan as Canada’s new Parliamentary Budget Officer. I should note at the outset that the CRA takes a firm stance on non-compliance, such as posting all convictions on Canada.ca, including convictions related to offshore tax evasion. The CRA also remains committed to supporting the PBO in carrying out her mandate, while at the same time protecting Canadians’ confidential tax information in accordance with the law. I recall that since 2016, the CRA has undertaken extensive work to study and report on the tax gap. Back in April 2016, the Government of Canada committed to estimating the federal tax gap. Consequently, the CRA established a dedicated unit to examine and publish a series of reports analyzing different aspects of the tax gap. In June 2022, the CRA published Canada’s first “Overall federal tax gap report”. This report brought together all of the agency’s previously published tax gap components, as well as updated estimates and key findings up to the 2018 tax year. Most recently, in late March, the CRA published the second “Overall federal tax gap report”. This edition presented the overall federal tax gap with updated estimates based on the latest available data for tax years from 2014 to 2022. This second overall report includes tax gap estimates for all major tax components: personal income tax, corporate income tax, goods and services tax, harmonized tax, sales tax and excise revenue. It also includes two new subcomponents, the payroll payment gap and cannabis excise gap, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the federal tax gap. All of the data in this report is also available through the Open Government portal for easy access. In addition to publishing the report, the CRA published its approach to addressing the tax gap, which focuses on strengthening compliance efforts by encouraging voluntary compliance, identifying compliance gaps and addressing non-compliance. Publishing this approach supports the Government of Canada’s commitment to transparency and fairness. Let us take a closer look at some of the results related to the estimation of the tax gap in Canada. From 2014 to 2022, the tax gap has remained stable at approximately 9% of the federal tax revenue. In the 2022 tax year, the gross tax gap stood at 16% of the federal tax revenue, or $59.5 billion. However, after accounting for the CRA’s compliance and collection activities, the total net tax gap was estimated at 9.3% of the federal revenue, or $34.7 billion. This means that the CRA’s compliance and collection activities continue to play a key role, potentially resulting in a 42% reduction, or $24.8 billion, in the overall gross tax gap. A detailed analysis shows that these compliance and collection activities represent a decrease of $10.8 billion of the gross personal income tax gap, $9.3 billion of the gross corporate income tax gap, $4.5 billion of the gross GST and HST gap, and $0.2 billion of the gross excise tax gap. It is important to note that Canada is among the few countries leading in such vast work on studying the tax gap. To do so, the CRA collaborated with experts, other government departments and international partners to develop methodologies that work within the Canadian context for the different components of the tax gap. Canada is part of a select group of countries that estimates tax gaps and publishes its analysis. The CRA is a member of the tax gap community of interest of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the OECD. The CRA has clearly demonstrated its commitment since 2016 to better study and report on the tax gap. Our knowledge of this issue comes from a wide variety of factors, including tax evasion, honest mistakes and bankruptcies resulting in unpayable tax debt. Since there are many factors outside of the control of the tax administration, there is an international consensus that the tax gap is unlikely to ever reach zero. In addition, the tax gap is a historical estimate of theoretical non-compliance and estimates can evolve over time as new data are obtained. Therefore, it is not a performance target for the CRA, but rather an important piece of information to monitor what is happening in the tax system. That being said, its measurement encourages an open and transparent discussion on tax non-compliance. In addition, a more insightful understanding of the tax gap can help the CRA better target its compliance and collection activities. With enhanced data sources, the CRA is well positioned to target those who push, or exceed, the limits of acceptable tax planning to evade or avoid taxes. This, of course, includes wealthy individuals and businesses. As such, the CRA takes a comprehensive approach to monitor and address tax non-compliance. Those who wilfully choose not to fulfill their tax obligations can face serious consequences, including criminal charges, prosecution, court-imposed fines, jail time and a criminal record. The CRA continues to use the tools at its disposal to detect and deter the most serious instances of non-compliance. In fact, through the CRA’s enhanced risk assessment, business intelligence, advanced data analysis, use of legal tools and international collaboration, it is much more difficult for any taxpayer to evade or avoid paying the taxes they owe. The CRA will continue its work to better understand Canada’s tax gap. It remains dedicated to playing a central role in maintaining tax fairness by administering tax laws and regulations impartially, conducting audits and taking—

Government Orders ·

Building Canada Strong Act

In response to a question from Greg Fergus

“I support this bill because Canadian businesses need to move faster to compete. Right now, shipping companies must fill out 12 different forms across five government offices. This bill lets them file their information once, which cuts red tape and lowers costs.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that is a wonderful question. As my colleague mentioned, from a business perspective, and as I mentioned in my speech, speed and efficiency are critical for Canadian businesses to compete in this global market, and all those considerations are certainly in there. I would like to highlight that in this process, we mentioned efficiencies for transportation. The marine sectors currently have to provide 12 distinct forms, with five federal departments and agencies, in duplicate. Ninety per cent of trade, by volume, with non-U.S. countries is carried out by marine vessels. Therefore, making it easier to file that data once and have it shared securely across departments would meaningfully cut red tape as we work to diversify trade. That is just a good example of how, throughout this process, we would be helping Canadians and helping our businesses to conduct business faster, and therefore reducing costs, making us more competitive.

In response to a question from Sébastien Lemire

“Our government respects endangered species. Our review process will protect endangered animals and follow international rules.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Canadian government certainly respects endangered species. In these processes and reviews, those would be taken into consideration to make sure that we protect endangered animals as well as follow international rules.

In response to a question from Dan Albas

“Transportation projects are vital for our supply chains and trade. We created a special office to coordinate these projects on their own, instead of putting them into one giant bureaucracy with other reviews.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I said in the speech, transportation projects are critical for our supply chain in Canada, in our trade with international partners. The transportation project office is intended to be the lead coordinator for transportation projects not already coordinated by IAAC, CER, CNSC or the Building Canada Act processes. These are all separate streams. Another bureaucracy would have bundled them all together, but we have chosen that the transportation project office would focus specifically on the transportation programs.

“I want the House to pass this bill. It cuts red tape for transportation projects so we can review them faster, while still protecting the environment and Indigenous rights.”
  • A repeated line

    “Our government is focused on what we can control.”

    Said 9 times by 7 members since April 30.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Bill C-39, the building Canada strong act, puts forward important legislative changes that would build on the government’s effort to protect Canada’s economic future by reducing the regulatory burden faced by the Canadian transportation sector. Last year, the government passed the Building Canada Act, which focused on accelerating the development of projects of national interest and removing barriers to internal trade and labour mobility. Today I am pleased to tell members that we have worked diligently in the last months on timely project reviews, streamlining government processes, ensuring that safeguards are in place when expediting project reviews, and reducing costs to Canadians and businesses. We all know that the global post-Cold War consensus has ruptured. For much of our history, Canadians have been able to count on favourable trade conditions, including a stable relationship with the United States; increasingly open access to the American market; and rules that both countries understood and respected. These conditions have not simply shifted. The decades-long process of steadily increasing integration between our economies is over. Tariffs are being treated as leverage, and supply chains are being treated as vulnerabilities. In a rapidly changing world, Canada’s new government is focused on what we can control. We are building our strength at home and diversifying our partnerships abroad. We have the right plan to build Canada strong. We are on track, and it is working. Transportation is the vital link connecting every other priority we have. We cannot diversify trade, build the strongest economy in the G7 and strengthen Canada’s competitiveness without a transportation system that works. Canada’s trade corridors connect Canadian businesses to markets and supply chains at home and around the world. We heard directly from indigenous peoples, the transportation industry and Canadians about what is needed to build stronger, more efficient and more resilient supply chains. We are taking action to reduce red tape, strengthen supply chains, accelerate infrastructure development and attract the investment needed to grow Canada’s economy and create good jobs. For too long, we have let red tape and underinvestment hinder the innovation and productivity of Canadian companies. We are not modern enough. We are too bureaucratic. We have not invested enough in our infrastructure. Other countries find us unreliable. These are things that we urgently have to address. That is why we would be providing regulatory certainty to modernize the rules that govern how we build and putting real investment behind the infrastructure we need to compete in this new world while protecting the health, safety and security of Canadians and the environment, and respecting indigenous rights. To support the government’s commitment to lower costs for Canadians and build a stronger economy, the government launched a red tape review in July 2025. Federal departments and agencies identified approximately 500 recent achievements and forward-looking actions to reduce regulatory red tape. This bill would begin the implementation of some of these forward-looking actions, showing how the government would deliver on its commitment to address barriers that slow private investment, limit labour mobility and restrict competition. Canada needs to be seen as a reliable and beneficial place to invest and do business. Inefficiencies in our trade processes and supply chains are costly and can hurt our reputation as a reliable trading partner. To maximize the full value of our budget 2025 investments, we must address long-standing constraints in the transportation system that limit investment, productivity, diversification and growth in key trade-enabling assets. The bill would support a more modern, responsive transportation system that can handle economic pressures, improve transportation performance and unlock new capacity across supply chains. A critical piece of this bill addresses the urgent need for timely and coordinated project reviews. Securing approvals for project works can take months or even years, creating significant delays in project delivery and limiting opportunities for job creation. These delays deter investment in resource projects, including in mining and oil and gas. This bill includes measures to reduce red tape and regulatory burden through a new transportation project office, which would complement efforts being led by the Major Projects Office and the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada to strengthen federal permitting coordination and Crown consultation for transportation projects to meet the government’s commitment of one project, one review within one year of receiving all necessary information from the proponent. These changes would enable industry to advance large-scale projects more efficiently with greater certainty, helping attract investment and facilitate trade-enabling infrastructure. The transportation project office would work to reduce bottlenecks, improve coordination and offer a one-window approach to proponents. This improved approach would maintain existing safeguards that ensure the integrity of project reviews. The objective is to unlock greater efficiency, not more risk. Similarly, the government is committed to having indigenous views and partnerships shape how projects are developed and carried out. We remain committed to upholding indigenous rights, including rights stemming from section 35 of the Constitution and from the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and to working with indigenous peoples during the implementation phase. The bill would also give Canada the tools to rapidly align with trusted international standards, strengthen how we collect, use and protect industry data, and modernize our marine security framework to better protect critical Canadian assets. Following the “tell us once” principle, government efforts on trade digitization will make it simpler for Canadian businesses to submit the necessary information to move trade faster and more efficiently across our borders. I want to especially highlight that last point. Today, industries fulfilling regulatory requirements are routinely required to submit the same or similar data to multiple departments in various formats and on different timelines. This imposes real costs and administrative burdens on businesses in meeting their regulatory obligations when engaging in international trade. Canadian businesses expect clear communication, faster turnaround times and the ability to track the status of their requests. By reducing duplication and streamlining reporting, a trade digitization initiative, once implemented, will lower costs and save time, ease the overall administration burden and let businesses focus primarily on growth and innovation. The bill would also provide authorities to enable Canada to rapidly align with trusted international standards, giving industry the certainty it needs to plan and invest with confidence, especially as Canada seeks to grow. With our rules and regulations moving at the same pace as those of our international partners, Canadian innovation and productivity would be unleashed, and Canadian companies could compete on a level playing field with their international competitors.

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS ·

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

“I am presenting a petition signed by over 2,400 Canadians. We want the government to make February Canadian Chinese heritage month to honor the contributions Chinese Canadians have made for over 230 years.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise today, with the member of Parliament from Port Moody—Coquitlam, to present an e-petition on behalf of over 2,400 Canadians seeking to designate February as Canadian Chinese heritage month. I stand, with national support from coast to coast, with many organizations and cities across the country joining our movement. The contributions of Chinese Canadians over the past 230 years deserve recognition. Our government’s message this year has been about building Canada strong. Chinese Canadians have been doing so since before Confederation.

Oral Questions ·

Health

“The government is giving $80 million to the Terry Fox Research Institute to help fight cancer. I want the parliamentary secretary to explain how this money helps cancer research and patients.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Terry Fox inspired a nation with his fight against cancer. Fifty years later, his dream of raising money for the fight against cancer still lives on. Yesterday, the Minister of Health announced that the government is providing $80 million to the Terry Fox Research Institute for the institute’s work in precision oncology research. Can the parliamentary secretary tell this House how this investment is accelerating research and bringing more personalized cancer care to patients across the country?

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“AI learns from what people post on social media, even when it is false. This makes AI biased. Can the member talk about how that affects society?”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Question or comment in debate

    Clarity 33 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to congratulate the member on his great speech, particularly around misinformation. As we know today, AI feeds on all sorts of comments, whether they are right or wrong, collectively on social media, and misinformation will obviously lead to a bias in the AI results. I wonder if the hon. member could speak on the impact of that for society in general.