MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Peter Fragiskatos

Follow by RSS

Fragiskatos, parliamentary secretary for immigration, defends Liberal benefits such as child care, dental support and the groceries and essentials benefit, and pushes immigration as a way to fill jobs in health care and the trades. He leans on open-ended promises — “We will continue in that vein” — and turns questions back on the Conservatives’ record, but also answers with figures, like the immigrant shares of nurses and doctors.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
C+
66 / 100 over 24 statements
Signal 65 / 100
Relevance 45 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 81 / 100
Loses points more than most for A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.2.1 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×2.1 Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.1.7 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.7 Loses points less than most for Thanks and tributes.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 24 of 27 statements graded so far.

Statements 27

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“Immigration helps our economy and brings needed workers to Canada, including doctors, nurses, and skilled tradespeople. I want the minister to explain how the government's spending plan and immigration policies support our economy.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, it is always an honour to address the House of Commons, particularly on the matter of immigration as parliamentary secretary responsible for immigration. We have a discussion tonight that has unfolded, and unfolded sometimes in unfortunate ways. The issue has been politicized over the past few years. Regardless, we have an opportunity now to seize the moment and be serious about a fundamental pillar of Canadian society and the Canadian economy. What is true for Canada, of course, is true for democracies around the world. We are engaged in a global competition for talent. How could we not be? I used the term “pillar” before. The immigration system has always served as a pillar of our country. When we look at those fundamental aspects that Canadians care about in the present and in the future, we look to the health care system first and foremost. Mr. Chair, you and I come from southwestern Ontario. We know the importance of nursing in our area. We know the importance of doctors in our area. You are from Stratford, and the surrounding communities have often lacked family doctors. The immigration system can help with that. The immigration system can help to secure nurses as well. In fact, 25% of nurses in Canada are immigrants, 37% of doctors are immigrants and 25% of overall health care workers in this country are immigrants. When we hear the minister tonight talk about pathways that have been made available to immigrants to settle in Canada to engage and work in the health care system, particularly doctors, she focuses on the right things. This government will stay seized with that. What about the trades? This country is seeing playing out, on a global level, a rupture. The Prime Minister rightly described it as such at Davos in that landmark speech. This is a rupture that is happening across the world. We need to build this country up to address that and to ensure that we export our resources with a focus on oil, a focus on critical minerals and the list goes on. We have to ensure, beyond sourcing domestic apprentices, which are so tremendously important, of course, that skilled tradespeople can come, and the immigration system has always served to benefit this country in that regard. We can think about Portuguese immigrants, Italian immigrants, and I will not let down my ancestors here, Greek immigrants as well, working in the skilled trades. I could cite many other examples of celebrated heritage communities in our country that have made such an important contribution, and the future is bright in that regard. We have a Prime Minister and a government that is absolutely focused on the economy and recognizing fundamentally the natural tie that exists between the immigration system and the economic system. Immigration policy is economic policy. We cannot divorce ourselves from that reality. What about clean energy? What I just said about skilled trades aligns with that as well. We have seen the government pursue a number of initiatives. Just this week, we see the deal that has been set with the German government in terms of LNG. We will see much more work done on this in a variety of ways to advance that important priority. We are going to need skilled tradespeople in that area as well, and the immigration system provides an answer to that. On advanced manufacturing, our region, and Mr. Chair, we come from southwestern Ontario, is going through a very troubling time right now. We should not hide from that fact. The trade war that we never asked for, but has been put upon us, is a very real one, and so advanced manufacturing needs to continue to be a focus. Once we see, hopefully, the page turn, and the American government and the Canadian government come to an agreement that serves this country’s interests, we can see a better future for advanced manufacturing. The immigration system can help in that regard as well. My question to the minister is on how the main estimates and how her overall approach, and this government’s approach, help to serve the immigration system and the economy. If she could talk specifically about the inextricable link between the two, I would appreciate it.

Oral Questions ·

Taxation

In response to a question from Tony Baldinelli

“Canadians are struggling, but the Conservatives have no plan to help them with food prices. They want to cut school food programs, child benefits, dental care, and child care. Our government is serious and will keep helping Canadians.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 42 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there are Canadians, certainly, who are experiencing hardship, but they will not find a plan for their future on the Conservative side, with all due respect. The member talks about food prices. The hon. Leader of the Opposition talked about food prices. There is no plan, in fact, on that side. They want to cut every support that goes towards that: the school food program, the Canada child benefit, dental care, child care. The list goes on. This is the Conservative approach: to throw whatever they can at the wall and catch a few headlines. It will not work. Canadians need a serious government. That is exactly what they have. We will continue to do this work.

Oral Questions ·

Youth

In response to a question from Garnett Genuis

“Experts agree our government manages money well. Conservatives want to cut help for child care, child benefits, and school food. We believe the government should keep these programs to help Canadians.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the International Monetary Fund has affirmed, as we know, the sound fiscal framework that the government has embraced. That is also true of the key rating agencies. My colleagues keep talking about a credit card. Yes, there are Canadians, young Canadians included, who do have credit card debt. Conservatives want to make it worse by forcing Canadians to not receive the Canada child benefit, to not receive support for child care and to not receive support for the school food program. Conservatives want Canadians to pay for these. In this country, we believe that government has a role in fundamentally making sure that Canadians have a chance. That is exactly what these programs do.

Oral Questions ·

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

In response to a question from Michelle Rempel Garner

“We are doing what we promised Canadians we would do. We have lowered the number of temporary residents and asylum seekers. We have cut student permits by 70 percent since 2014, and we are strengthening our borders.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 32 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I have shared with the House before, personal attacks speak for themselves. What do we see on this side of the House? We are working for Canadians, putting in place the platform that every single Liberal MP ran on, which is being executed now: a decline in the number of temporary residents, a decline in the number of people seeking asylum, working toward and improving the international student system, a 70% decline in the number of student permits issued since 2014, and an entry and exit system that is being strengthened in partnership with the CBSA. I could go on. We will continue to be serious. The Conservatives can continue to play games.

Oral Questions ·

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

“Fewer asylum seekers are coming to Canada, so use of the federal health program for refugees is down. Refugees make up only one percent of our population. The Conservatives are wrong to blame them for problems in our health care system.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 43 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the use of the interim federal health program has declined by 43% quite recently. We will continue to see that, because we are seeing a dramatic decline in the number of people seeking asylum in this country. It is down by a third, in fact. Let us go one step further, though, and question the premise of the question. Refugees make up 1% of the country’s population. Are Conservatives trying to tell us seriously now that refugees are to blame for challenges in the health care system? The Conservatives demonize, they play right-wing politics and they embrace populism. It is no way forward. We will focus on Canadians.

“Both Conservative and Liberal governments have supported health care for asylum seekers for decades. The program costs more now because more people are seeking asylum here. We are working to lower costs by making people pay for part of their care starting in May.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member is referring to the interim federal health program, a program that has been in existence since the 1950s, a program that has been supported by successive Conservative and Liberal governments. Yes, this program does provide health care for people seeking asylum. What have we seen since 2015? We have seen a mass displacement crisis across the world. Canada has seen a mass increase as a result of people seeking asylum in this country. The program’s costs obviously have grown dramatically since then. What have we done? We have worked to bring down costs, putting in place a copayment system that is going into effect in May.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

In response to a question from Branden Leslie

“The Conservatives say they care about regular people, but their leader insulted a waitress's home. They will not say what they want to cut. I believe they will cut money for children, school food, and day care.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will give the Conservatives credit. They are on message. The script does not change. They talk about being in touch. I remind my colleagues that it was their leader who stood in front of the home of a waitress and called it a shack. What do they want to cut? The members on that side have never answered us. Would they cut the child benefit? Would they cut the food program in schools? Would they cut day care supports? They would cut all of it. They do not have a plan. They are not serious.