MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Pierre Paul-Hus

Follow by RSS

Paul-Hus presses the government to stop Bill C-40’s defence procurement agency as an opaque body, to restore the $12-million Commissionaires contract to the Canadian firm employing veterans, to adopt Conservative crime bills on bail and sentencing, and to reverse cuts to corrections officers’ prison resources. He asserts certainty in place of a source, declaring “The facts are clear” or “That is the reality on the ground,” and often cites his 22 years in the Canadian Forces.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A–
88 / 100 over 46 statements
Signal 82 / 100
Relevance 77 / 100
Respect 98 / 100
Clarity 91 / 100
Loses points more than most for Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.3.6 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×3.6 A story that illustrates instead of making a point.1.6 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.6 Loses points less than most for Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Thanks and tributes.Less often than most members.What the tags mean A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 46 of 49 statements graded so far.

Statements 49

Oral Questions ·

Justice

“Canada was safe before 2015. Since then, the Liberals have ruined the justice system and done nothing to fix it. They always reject our bills on public safety. I want the Liberals to stop talking and take real action.”
Official Hansard

Talk, talk and more talk, Mr. Speaker. Before 2015, public safety in Canada was fine. Since 2015, the Liberals have made a complete mess of the criminal justice system. Since 2015, they have been saying that they are going to fix it, but absolutely nothing has been done. Conservatives have introduced a number of private members’ bills to address public safety issues in Canada. The Liberals always say no. When will the Liberals stop wasting time on empty talk and start taking real action to protect public safety?

“Suspects in a Sainte-Foy shooting were released on bail and then arrested again. I want the Prime Minister to make bail rules stricter and keep violent suspects in jail to protect Canadians.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in June, a 19-year-old woman in Sainte-Foy was shot after being mistaken for someone else. Two suspects were arrested and released on a promise to appear. They were recently rearrested, and a third suspect was apprehended earlier today. Will the Prime Minister tighten bail rules and keep people accused of violent crimes in jail when the safety of Canadians is at risk?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Canadians are paying more for housing, food, and travel because of government spending. The Conservative plan would save them money on homes, gas, groceries, and cars. The government should stop defending its taxes and help people save money instead.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, when I hear the Minister of Finance rhyme off numbers like that, I see how completely disconnected they are from reality. The everyday reality for Canadians is that, after years of Liberal spending, they are paying more for housing, food and transportation. The Conservative plan will save them money on housing, gas, groceries and Canadian-made cars. Why do the Liberals insist on defending their taxes and spending instead of helping Canadians save money?

“The government is wasting billions on outside consultants, corporate handouts, and costly projects. Conservatives found over $150 billion in savings to lower debt and cut taxes. I want the government to stop this wasteful spending, cancel the carbon tax, and adopt our plan.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, while the Liberals are spending billions of dollars on consultations, corporate subsidies and costly projects, we Conservatives have identified over $150 billion in savings. That is nearly $10,000 per family to help shrink the debt, reduce taxes and save Canadians money. Will the government cut spending on consultants and corporate subsidies, eliminate the industrial carbon tax and adopt the Conservative economic action plan?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Canadians are struggling with money, and businesses are leaving for the United States. This means Canada is losing jobs. The economy has stopped moving, and the government is ignoring it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think that the Minister of Finance is out of touch with reality. What we see on the ground, what we have observed, is that this is not working at all. What is more, a poll shows that 60% of Canadians are anxious because they do not have enough money and do not know how things will turn out. Then there are our entrepreneurs. As I said when I asked the first question: they have stopped investing. Those who are already in the United States are sending all their business there. That means job losses in Canada. Where is the good news in all this? Everything has come to a standstill. Nothing is moving forward. Does the Prime Minister realize that?

“The Prime Minister says the economy is doing well, but we are in a recession. Businesses in Quebec are cancelling investments and moving out of Canada. Does the Prime Minister realize his policies are driving businesses away?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister claimed that the cost of living is the best it has been in decades, but I have some news for him: We are in a recession. Along with my Conservative colleagues, I travelled across Quebec last week to hear from entrepreneurs. In Beauce, Bellechasse, the Lower St. Lawrence, Saguenay and Quebec City, the conclusion is always the same: Investments are being postponed, planned expansions are on hold and some companies are moving their operations outside of Canada. Does the Prime Minister understand that his greatest failure has been creating a climate in which businesses prefer to produce elsewhere?

Oral Questions ·

The Environment

“Lac Saint-Charles gives drinking water to 300,000 people near Quebec City. Years ago, I asked for $200 million from the federal government to protect it, and the Liberals supported it. Now they have done nothing. I want the minister to explain why the government cancelled this money.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Lac Saint-Charles provides drinking water to nearly 300,000 residents of the Quebec City region. Between 2019 and 2021, I proposed a $200-million federal investment to protect this resource, and that proposal was supported by the former minister, the current member for Québec Centre. Seven years on, nothing has been done. Can the Secretary of State for Nature explain why the Liberals have scrapped this crucial investment in protecting Lac Saint-Charles and Quebec City’s drinking water?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“The Prime Minister spends an average of $70,000 on food and drinks for each trip. How can he defend spending this taxpayer money when food bank use is higher than ever?”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Respect 64 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “it must be hard for the Prime Minister to get used to life in the public service after having enjoyed the perks”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think the tone I used was appropriate, considering how wasteful the party across the way has been all these years. I know that it must be hard for the Prime Minister to get used to life in the public service after having enjoyed the perks of working for a private company like Brookfield. However, it is important to understand that each trip costs an average of $70,000 in food and drink. That is not the cost of the plane, nor is it the cost of fuel; it is just the bill for food and drink. At a time when food banks are seeing greater demand than ever, how can the Prime Minister justify this to Canadian taxpayers?

“Canadians are struggling to afford food and everyday costs. At the same time, the Prime Minister spent nearly $1 million on airplane food for 14 trips. I want to know if he thinks that is a responsible use of taxpayers' money.”
  • A repeated line

    “People are struggling to make ends meet.”

    Said 13 times by 10 members since April 27.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, when the Prime Minister left his job as the chair of Brookfield in New York to come to Canada, he forgot that he was no longer working for a private company but for Canadian taxpayers. Right now, Canadians are going through a recession. They are paying more for everything, and millions are struggling to make ends meet. Meanwhile, government documents show that the Prime Minister spent nearly $1 million on inflight catering for just 14 trips. While families have to watch every penny they spend at the grocery store, does the Prime Minister really think that spending $1 million on inflight meals is a responsible use of taxpayers’ money?

Oral Questions ·

Rail Transportation

“Many Canadians cannot afford food right now. The government should not spend over $100 billion on a fast train that people cannot afford to ride. I want an answer.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think the Secretary of State for Nature did not understand what I said in my first question. Sixty per cent of Canadians are feeling anxious, and 38% of Canadians are experiencing food insecurity. The government wants to embark on a high-speed rail project costing over $100 billion while people are going hungry. How can anyone think that these people can afford a ticket to ride the high-speed train when they cannot even afford groceries? Can she answer that?

“Canadians are struggling to buy food and pay their bills. Why is the government spending more than $100 billion on a high-speed train?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, a United Way report released today reveals that Canadians are increasingly concerned about their financial situations. According to the report, 60% of Canadians are anxious about their finances, and 38% of Canadians are experiencing food insecurity. While families are struggling to build a future for themselves, the government wants them to foot the bill for a high-speed rail project that could cost more than $100 billion. Just this morning, the Liberals admitted that they have no idea how much it is going to cost. If Canadians can no longer afford to put food on the table, why do the Liberals think they can afford to spend over $100 billion on a train?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Businesses are not investing or expanding because of the government's economic policies. I want the Prime Minister to explain why he is proud of creating this uncertainty during a recession.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, what the government has to understand is that businesses have told us that they are waiting. They are waiting to invest, they are waiting to expand their facilities and they are waiting to take risks. Is that the government’s idea of good economic conditions: a climate of uncertainty that is paralyzing private investment at a time when Canada is in a recession? Is the Prime Minister proud of having created an economic climate where business owners are choosing to wait or to invest outside Canada?

“Quebec businesses are hurting and holding back on investments because of U.S. tariffs and trade issues. Does the Prime Minister realize Quebeckers are paying the price for his failure to fix our economy?”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada is now the only G7 country in recession.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since June 1.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, last week we met with businesses across Quebec. The picture is the same everywhere: The uncertainties surrounding CUSMA and the U.S. tariffs under section 232 are increasing the financial pressure on our manufacturers and hampering investment. Business owners tell us they are putting expansion plans on hold, delaying equipment purchases and hesitating to invest in their growth. That is the reality on the ground, while Canada is the only G7 country in recession. Does the Prime Minister understand that Quebeckers are the ones now paying the price for his inability to restore confidence in our economy?

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“Conservatives are not making things up for social media. Canada has lost 113,400 jobs, people are struggling to buy food, and the economy is shrinking toward a recession. I want the member to explain his thinking instead of attacking us.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I love hearing my colleague accuse the Conservatives of being people who just want sound bites for social media. The point is that we are not making things up when we present the facts, when we talk about the loss of 113,400 jobs in Canada and when we talk about how people are struggling to put food on the table. We have the statistics to back up what we are saying. Statistics Canada has said that two consecutive quarters of negative growth mean we are headed for a recession. We are not making that up. I would like the member to provide further clarification on his way of thinking rather than attacking us in such a strange way.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Canada is in a recession, the Prime Minister has not fixed our problems with Donald Trump, and Quebec has lost 87,000 jobs this year. I want an emergency debate to hear the government's plan to fix this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the minister is right: The Liberals received a mandate, but they are not fulfilling their mandate. The proof is that we are currently in a recession. Furthermore, the Prime Minister swore he was the only one capable of resolving the problem with Donald Trump. A year and a half later, absolutely nothing has been resolved. Meanwhile, 87,000 jobs were lost in Quebec during the first four months of 2026. Nearly half of those were lost in the construction and manufacturing sectors. The Conservatives are requesting an emergency debate because we want to know what the plan is. Instead of listening to all sorts of nonsense, can we have an emergency debate to find out what the government’s plan really is and see if we can help?

“Canada is the only G7 country in a recession, and we have lost over 112,000 jobs this year. The Prime Minister misled Canadians about our economy. Why did he lead us into this recession?”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada is the only G20 country in a recession.”

    Said 104 times by 61 members since May 29.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canada is the only G7 country that is in a recession. However, just a few days ago, the Prime Minister was bragging that Canada is the second-strongest economy in the G7. It is clear that he misled Canadians. Meanwhile, 112,300 jobs have been lost since the beginning of the year. Canada now has the second-highest unemployment rate in the G7. Other countries are facing the same tariffs and the same international crises. Why is the Prime Minister the only G7 leader to have led his country into a Liberal recession?

Oral Questions ·

Taxation

“Gas is very expensive right now. Other countries have cut their gas taxes to help people. The government should remove the GST on gas to make it cheaper.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, countries around the world are working to help their citizens. As everyone knows, filling up the car with gas is really expensive these days. Everyone is talking about it everywhere. The holidays are coming up, and it costs a fortune to gas up. Australia, Spain and Ireland have realized this and have eliminated gas taxes. What is the government waiting for now to eliminate the GST? The GST applied to the cost of gas is on top of other taxes. Will the government eliminate it, at least temporarily, to give people some breathing room?

“The government removed the tax on gas, but that is not enough. The clean fuel rules still add 7 cents to every litre of gas, and that will go up to 17 cents. I want the Prime Minister to end these rules now.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, after weeks of pressure from the Conservative Party, the Liberals have finally come to their senses and eliminated the excise tax on gasoline, but that is not enough. The Liberals continue to maintain the so-called clean fuel standard, another hidden tax that currently adds 7¢ per litre and could rise to 17¢ per litre by 2030. Canadians need real relief now, not a half-measure from the Liberals. Will the Prime Minister finally abolish the clean fuel standard, yes or no?

Oral Questions ·

National Defence

“The Snowbirds are in danger of being cancelled. The government has had 11 years to fix the problems with them. I want the minister to give a real answer about their future.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, one symbol that unites all Canadians from coast to coast to coast is the Snowbirds, but my colleagues from Saskatchewan have now asked the Minister of National Defence four questions, and his only answer is that to suggest the program should not be cancelled is to put pilots’ lives in danger. What have the Liberals been doing for the past 11 years? They have known for quite some time that something needed to be done, and now the Snowbirds are in danger. Does the minister have anything to tell us other than this nonsense?

Oral Questions ·

National Defence

“The military turned away most Canadians who wanted to join and recruited non-citizens instead, including people who do not speak English or French. I want an answer on how this keeps Canada safe.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, unfortunately, that answer is absolutely meaningless. It is important to understand that, between 2022 and 2025, 192,000 Canadians wanted to enroll but only 15,000 were accepted. Meanwhile, the government recruited permanent residents, non-Canadians and people who do not speak English or French and enrolled them in officer courses. How can we keep our country safe when we rely on people who do not understand our culture, do not understand our language and do not want to listen to orders from women? Can we get an answer on that?