MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Ted Falk

Follow by RSS

Falk pushes to cut federal gas and diesel taxes, arguing removing all of them would save the average family $1,200 a year, wants fewer barriers to resource development, and sponsors a bill to keep cash available and block a digital dollar. He often opens with everyday scenes, telling the House, “I would like to start where a lot of Canadians start their day,” at the gas pump. He also backs his arguments with figures on fuel prices and inflation.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B+
83 / 100 over 15 statements
Signal 71 / 100
Relevance 82 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 93 / 100
Averaged over the 15 of 16 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Loses points more than most for

Loses points less than most for A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.Less often than most members.What the tags mean

Statements 16

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“The Liberals keep breaking their promises. They promised an earlier bill would get big projects built, but it failed, so now they need another bill. The Prime Minister also promised a trade deal with the United States and failed to deliver it. Canadians are tired of promises that never lead to results.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 37 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we talk a lot about broken promises. I remember it was only about 18 months ago when the member across the way was speaking very passionately about what Bill C-5 would do and how it would accomplish all these big projects. He talked about the promises that were made at that time. Unfortunately, now we are going to also be looking at Bill C-39, because apparently Bill C-5 did not do it. It was another broken promise. The Prime Minister promised he would have a trade deal with the United States, saying that he was a master, world-class negotiator. We know that has not happened. We have had a lot of broken promises by the Liberals. It reminds me of a farmer in spring after he has his seed in the ground. The member for Sarnia—Lambton was talking about agriculture, which made me think of that. The seed is in the ground, and the farmer sees a cloud on the horizon. He knows there is rain coming, but then the cloud comes and there is no rain. That is how I think a lot of Canadians feel with the broken promises: There is a promise of rain, but nothing comes.

Government Orders ·

Canadian Fuel Affordability Act

In response to a question from Mel Arnold

“The price of diesel fuel almost doubled this past year. Farmers must absorb these higher costs because they cannot set the market prices for their crops. At the same time, truckers and food processors pass high fuel costs along to shoppers, which makes food more expensive. We should pass this bill to lower fuel taxes.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is true that farmers have to absorb the cost of increased diesel fuel prices, and they have increased almost 100%. In other words, for Canadians watching today, the price of diesel fuel has almost doubled in this last year, and farmers have no choice. They have to put diesel fuel into their combines, trucks and tractors, and they also have to then have that product shipped to the elevator and shipped to a rail yard before it can be sent to a processing facility, where it gets processed and manufactured into food products, which again get shipped with a transport truck across the highway, burning diesel fuel at $2.60 a litre. The food products finally get delivered to a warehouse, and from a warehouse, they will get picked up one more time by a semi-truck and delivered to a retailer for distribution or for sale to the public. All of those activities require the use of diesel fuel, and when diesel fuel has increased by almost 100% in the last year for the farmer, there is nothing he can do about it, because his prices for his products are commodity prices. They are market-based. However, for the transport companies and for the processors, the price of increased fuel and energy costs are actually being put onto the backs of consumers who are buying those products, because they are just moved along, and the farmers absorb it. Processors and truckers do their best to pass those costs along to the consumer, the end user.

In response to a question from John-Paul Danko

“This bill only saves four cents a litre on diesel and ten cents on gasoline. That is not enough to help farmers, truckers, and contractors who cannot afford life right now. The Liberals voted against admitting there is an affordability crisis, yet now they are looking at a fuel affordability bill. That is hypocritical.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 24 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 18 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the issue that we are looking at today is Bill C-38, which proposes four cents a litre on diesel fuel alone and 10¢ a litre on gasoline. Like I said before, four cents a litre on diesel fuel to farmers, truckers or contractors is a rounding error. The crisis that folks in manufacturing and transportation are facing is affordability. The Liberals today had an opportunity to recognize, through our motion, that for the past 11 years we have been governed here in Canada by a Liberal government, and that today, we are in an affordability crisis. The Liberals said no. All the other parties agreed that we are in an affordability crisis. They had the opportunity to say no, and I find it really hypocritical that today we are studying what is known as the Canadian fuel affordability act.

“Conservatives will vote for this bill because it gives Canadians some relief at the gas pump. But it does not do enough. It saves drivers about five dollars a tank, and it only cuts four cents a litre on diesel when prices are up 80%. High diesel prices make groceries and shipping cost more for everyone. The government should remove the GST from fuel, scrap the carbon taxes, and give real relief to truckers and farmers.”
  • A repeated line

    “Including the industrial carbon tax and the clean fuel standard.”

    Said 10 times by 9 members since April 28.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the hon. member for Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies. Before I begin my speech, I would like to recognize our parliamentary staff who are sitting here late into the evening, the clerks, the recorders, the Sergeant-at-Arms and the technicians, as well as the Parliamentary Protective Service. I want to thank them for putting in the extra time to make sure that Canadians can exercise their democracy in the House. I am honoured to speak to Bill C-38, the Canadian fuel affordability act. I would like to start where a lot of Canadians start their day, which is at the gas pump and the gas checkout. At the end of September, a litre of diesel across this country cost $2.60, according to Natural Resources Canada. In the weeks before that, diesel had peaked at about $2.75 a litre nationally, which is about 80% above the roughly $1.40 to $1.50 that Canadians were paying a year ago. That is an 80% increase in 12 months. Let me say this plainly. Conservatives will vote for this bill. Any measure that lets Canadians keep more of their own money at the pump, we will support. We supported it when it was proposed, and we support it today, but if the government expects a round of applause, I would remind the House how we got here. When the fuel excise tax was suspended in April, the pause was set to expire on Labour Day. That was the plan, to put taxes back on gas and diesel just as Canadians were heading into the fall with prices still soaring. It took months of pressure from this side of the House, the Leader of the Opposition, truckers, farmers and families before the government changed course. I am pleased it did, but Canadians should not have to drag relief out of Ottawa one reluctant extension at a time. Let me tell the House and the Canadians who are watching what this bill does. It extends the suspension of the federal fuel excise tax until January 31, 2027. It then cuts the regular rates in half until the end of March, with full rates returning on April 1. For the average driver, that means about five dollars saved on a typical 50-litre tank of gasoline. That is it. It is still something, but it is only five dollars per fill. Let us look at what we are up against here. Stats Canada reported yesterday that inflation rose to 3.1% in September, driven by gasoline prices that were up 27.8% from a year ago. Without gasoline inflation, it was about 2.2%. In other words, the cost of living crisis is not some mystery. One input is dragging the whole bucket up. Energy prices are up 19%, and fuel oil and other fuels are up 57.8%, which is how much more a family in Atlantic Canada will pay to stay warm this winter. Grocery prices are still up 33% from September of 2020. Families have not recovered from that. Now they are being asked to again absorb a fuel shock on top of it. Here is where the bill falls short. Gasoline is up about 28% from a year ago, and diesel is up 80%. The excise tax relief is 10¢ a litre on gasoline, but only four cents a litre on diesel. That is four cents against a price of $2.60, which is about a penny and a half on every dollar of fuel. For the farmers who produce our food, the people who move this country’s food, fuel and building materials, and the contractors who build our infrastructure and homes, four pennies a litre is a rounding error. The Liberals need to get serious. Consider the long-haul trucker. That is a real person driving an 18-wheeler. A long-haul truck holds about 1,000 litres of diesel fuel. Back in March, with prices well below where they are now, filling one in Toronto would cost roughly $2,300, and that was about a $700 increase from the prior year. At today’s prices, it is about $2,600, which equates to more than $1,000 per tank above last year. What does this bill save on that fill-up? It is about $40 on $2,600. It is only 40 bucks on 1,000 litres. It is still 40 bucks, but that is all it is. I want the House to hear the voices behind those numbers. One Ontario owner-operator told reporters his fuel costs have risen by about $1,000 per truck every month and that his credit cards are filling up. His trucks haul food to northern communities. A small business owner is putting the groceries for remote northern communities on his credit card while the government calls four cents a litre relief. Consider the Maritimes and the Atlantic provinces. Trucking associations say that 90% of the food, forestry products and manufactured goods used in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick move there by truck. There’s no other way to get them there. The pain is uneven. Last week, the average fuel price ran from $2.94 a litre to $2.47 a litre in Grande Prairie. Consider the farmer who is in the field right now. The Grain Growers of Canada calculated that a single combine running through a 30-day harvest costs an extra $15,120 in fuel. That is one machine. Farmers cannot pass that cost along because the market sets the price of their crop and the commodities that they produce. By my math, the excise relief on that same combine is worth about $670, roughly 4% of that added cost. It does not stop at the farm gate. Researchers at Dalhousie have modelled a half-point to seven-tenths of a point bump in grocery inflation if elevated diesel prices persist, not increase but persist. A tax on fuel is a tax on everything that moves by truck, which is everything on a grocery store shelf and everything in new homes. What would real relief look like? Conservatives have been clear. We would extend the full excise holiday until Canada Day 2027. We would remove the GST from fuel purchases. At current prices, the GST accounts for roughly 13¢ of every litre of diesel, a tax collected on top of a tax. The higher the price goes, the more Ottawa takes in. We would permanently scrap the industrial carbon tax and the clean fuel standard, which the Leader of the Opposition has called “carbon tax 2.0”. Conservatives calculate that, together, these measures would save Canadians up to 25¢ a litre, as much as $1,200 a year per families. That is what real relief looks like. That is a long way from the four cents a litre that the Liberal government is offering in the bill. Canadians deserve to know why this country, one of the greatest energy producers in the world, is paying so much to fill a diesel tank. The Leader of the Opposition has pointed out that Canadian diesel prices are about 32¢ a litre higher than in the United States, our neighbours to the south. Conservatives say that Canada produces enough diesel to meet national demand but transportation bottlenecks leave some regions dependent on U.S. imports. We should be using our own energy to power our own people. Canada should be refining and delivering its own fuel, not leaving truckers and farmers at the mercy of global pressures. Last week, we gave the House a chance to act. On October 7, Conservatives tabled a motion calling for an end to all federal taxes on diesel fuel until Canada Day. It was defeated. Only Conservatives voted in favour. The Liberals, the Bloc and the NDP all voted against. Canadians should remember that vote. When the people who produce and move our food ask for help, those parties in the House said no. As for what comes next, the Minister of Finance has said that whether relief continues past March will depend on global conflict, oil prices and the state of federal finances, without naming any price threshold or formula. Farmers cannot plan a planting season around waiting and seeing. Truckers and contractors cannot price a contract that way. Families cannot budget on hope. After a decade of Liberal government, Canadians are tired. They are tired of being told that tax relief is a gift from Ottawa rather than their own money being returned. They are tired of half measures and of relief that arrives late, shrinks on schedule and comes with no plan. Here is the Conservative plan. We will vote for the bill because of the current affordability crisis, as Canadians need every cent they can get, but we will keep fighting for the rest, for no GST on fuel, no industrial carbon tax, no clean fuel regulations and a Canada that produces and refines its own diesel. A tax on fuel is a tax on everything, and Canadians have already paid enough. To the truckers sleeping in cabs on the long road home, to the farmers in the combine long after sunset and to the parents doing math at the grocery store or gas station, we see them. They should be assured that Conservatives are fighting for their jobs. We are fighting for their families, and we are fighting for them.

“Fishers in Newfoundland and Labrador are already facing many problems, and high diesel prices are making their costs even worse. I want the member to explain how these fuel costs are hurting the fishers in her area.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my friend and colleague’s fishers just off the coast of Newfoundland and Labrador have been experiencing a lot of challenges lately, not the least of which is the snow crab quota aspirations of the French. Now, they are faced with higher diesel prices, which impact every fisher because those big fishing boats are powered by diesel. They are experiencing a significant increase in their costs as well. I would like the member to maybe extrapolate what that means for her fishers.

Statements by Members ·

Energy Resources

“Canada has a lot of oil, but Canadians are paying high fuel prices because of Liberal taxes and red tape. High diesel costs make everything more expensive. The government needs to cut taxes and remove rules so Canadian workers can develop our resources.”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada has the world's fourth-largest proven oil reserves.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since October 5.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canada has the world’s fourth-largest proven oil reserves. We have the resources to fuel our country, and yet Canadians are paying more at the pump. We cannot control everything that drives up energy prices around the world, but we can control the barriers that we put in our own way. After 11 years, Liberal taxes and red tape have made it harder to build the projects that turn Canadian resources into Canadian fuel, jobs and opportunity. It does not have to be that way. Canadian workers should be turning Canadian resources into Canadian prosperity. Conservatives have a plan to move Canada forward, cut taxes, remove unnecessary barriers and get Canadian resources to market. Diesel is not a luxury. It fuels our farms, our trucks and the equipment that keeps the country moving. When diesel costs more, Canadians pay more. Canada has the resources. We have the workers. We have the opportunity. What Canadians need is for government to get out of the way and to allow resource development, with Canadian resources, by Canadian workers and for Canadian prosperity.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Canadians are losing sleep worrying about how to pay for food, gas, and housing. The government has put Canada into a recession. I want the Prime Minister to reverse his costly policies.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canadians are losing sleep because of the Prime Minister. A new United Way report confirms that 40% say they lie awake, worrying how to stretch their paycheque to pay for food, gas and housing. While Canadians are awake with anxiety, these Liberals are asleep at the wheel, refusing to acknowledge that they have driven Canada into the only recession in the G20. Canadians carry the stress and lose the sleep while the Liberals keep hitting the snooze button on the consequences. Will the Prime Minister wake up and reverse his costly policies that are keeping Canadians awake at night?

Statements by Members ·

The Economy

“Canada's economy is shrinking under the Prime Minister, and we have high debt, high housing costs, and high unemployment. The Liberals need to admit their economic policies failed and change them.”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada is the only G20 country in a recession.”

    Said 104 times by 61 members since May 29.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, under the Liberal Prime Minister, Canada is the only G20 country to fall into a recession. Just like he manufactured a Liberal majority government, he has now manufactured a full-blown Liberal recession. Instead of building the second-fastest growing economy he promised, he has actually shrunk it. All of this is from the same Prime Minister who described himself as the best person equipped to manage an economic crisis. In any other industry, that alone would call for a performance review. The Parliamentary Budget Officer just reported that there is only a 1% chance the government will meet and maintain its fiscal anchor of shrinking the deficit. Canada now has the highest household debt, the worst housing costs and the second-highest unemployment rate in the G7. Excuses simply do not cut it for children with empty stomachs, moms with empty grocery carts and parents with hollow bank accounts. The Liberals need to admit their policies have failed, reverse course and position Canada for the win. It is time to get Canada back on track.

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“Statistics Canada says Canada is the only G7 country in a recession. Why do the Prime Minister and the Liberals refuse to admit our economy is in trouble?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague from Newmarket—Aurora for her excellent analysis of the situation we find ourselves in here in Canada, where the Liberals, and the Prime Minister in particular, refuse to acknowledge the data provided by Stats Canada that we are in a recession and are the only country in the G7 in a recession. I am wondering if the member has any thoughts on why the Prime Minister and his Liberal colleagues refuse to admit the seriousness of our financial situation here in Canada.

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“Canadians need help with high costs. The government should cut its taxes on fuel to lower gas prices. High corporate taxes from oil companies would make up for that lost revenue. I want to know if the member agrees this is a good start.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I agree with the member in recognizing that there is an affordability crisis and that Canadians need relief. It would certainly provide a lot of relief to almost every single Canadian family to have the price of gas reduced by the amount of taxes being charged by the Liberal government. We cannot control global oil prices, so those profits with the oil companies would be there. However, they are also going to generate a lot of corporate taxes to the federal government, which would offset the loss from reducing the excise tax, the GST and the industrial carbon tax on the price of fuel. Would the member agree with me that this would be a good start?

Government Orders ·

Military Justice System Modernization Act

“The government is rushing this bill instead of letting us fully debate it. We need to modernize the military justice system, but we must make sure it helps victims of military sexual abuse. I want to know if the minister has met with any of these victims.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it sure did not take long for the Liberals to show their true character. Time allocation and closure motions are the kind of stuff we do when we want to ram things through without proper debate. I know my constituents expect me to come here and to thoroughly debate every single piece of legislation, to ensure that every avenue has been explored. They expect that we go down every rabbit hole and that we know what we are ending up with is a product we can all be pleased with. I think the justice system needs to be modernized. This has become clear at committee. I think it would be prudent for us to make sure we listen to the survivors and victims of the sexual abuse that has happened in the military to make sure this act really represents the justice they deserve. Has the minister personally met with any of the victims or survivors of sexual abuse in the military?

Statements by Members ·

Niverville Nighthawks

“I want to congratulate the Niverville Nighthawks hockey team from my riding. They won their league championship and will now play in the national championship tournament.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, today, I congratulate an extraordinary team from Provencher, the Niverville Nighthawks, on capturing the Manitoba Junior Hockey League championship. In just its fourth season, the Nighthawks achieved a record-setting 51‑6‑1 regular season and established itself as one of the most dominant teams in league history. It carried that success through the playoffs, defeating the Virden Oil Caps to capture the Turnbull Cup and become MJHL champions. The accomplishment is the result of a team effort, highlighted by exceptional individual performances and leadership throughout the organization. Goaltender Austin Dubinsky was named playoff MVP, Captain Adam Vigfusson led by example, Merik Boles was recognized with the top sportsmanship award and Coach Dwight Hirst was named coach of the year. Now the team will represent Manitoba at the Centennial Cup in Prince Edward Island, competing against the best junior A teams from across Canada. On behalf of the House, I congratulate the Niverville Nighthawks on its incredible achievement and wish the team continued success as it pursues a national championship. Go, Nighthawks.

Statements by Members ·

Fuel Taxes

“The government should remove all fuel taxes for the rest of the year. Life is too expensive, and doing this would save the average Canadian family $1,200.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there are moments in life when one looks back and says, “I could have. I would have. I should have.” We just could be at one of those moments. The Liberal government is only cancelling a third of the gas tax and for only a third of the year. Canadians do not want to get fooled; they want to get fuelled. Inflation is hurting, and the government can make the right decision to change that. Removing the full 25¢-per-litre of gas taxes could help families get to their child’s activities, drive to work and pick up groceries. Conservatives want a country where Canadians do not have to choose between a full grocery cart and a full tank of gas. Removing all the taxes on gas and diesel for the rest of the year would save the average Canadian family $1,200 per year. That is a huge amount. Let us not look back on this moment with regret. The Liberals must seize the moment, take our Conservative plan and provide real relief for Canadians today.

Government Orders ·

Government Business No. 9—Changes to the Standing Orders

In response to a question from Gabriel Ste-Marie

“The Liberals want more committee seats than they should have based on their share of the House. They should not get that much control.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the hon. member highlighted a lot of areas. We know that with the stolen seats that the Liberals recently acquired from opposition members, they now have 50.8% of the seats in this House. What they are trying to do with this motion is acquire 58.3% of the seats in committees. That is actually very unreasonable. They are looking to have seven out of 12 members be Liberal members. Why would they not be happy with six out of 11? If the Liberals are so bent on having control of the voting, why do they not give up the chairmanship of those committees? Then they could have control of the votes. Would that not make them happy, if they had maybe 54% of the representation instead of 58%?

In response to a question from Mark Gerretsen

“The government has barely half the seats. I want to know why they think they should get 60 percent of the seats on committees.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my friend across the way gave a very passionate speech. He implored us to speak to the issues and not about people, so I want to do that. I want to know in what realm he thinks it is reasonable to ask for a 60% majority on committees when the majority that the government has is closer to 50%.

“The Liberals are using their power to cut off debate on an important issue. They are trying to take control of committees so they can push bills through without enough discussion. This is wrong, and they should not end the debate.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this is incredibly shameful. What we are seeing here is the Liberal government, immediately upon swearing in three new members today, calling for a closure motion on a very important debate that Canadians expect this Parliament to hold. The Liberals were not given a majority by Canadians. They stole a majority. Now, they are immediately abusing the power of a majority government to bring in this motion to give themselves a supermajority at committees so that they can ram through their legislation without proper debate. Canadians expect more from this Parliament than what the Liberals are offering today, and presenting a motion of closure is just inappropriate at this time.