MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

William Stevenson

Follow by RSS

Stevenson pushes to remove federal fuel taxes, seeks funding to make O’Chiese Road safe, and is pressing the government to reinstate the search and rescue dog program in Banff National Park. He often illustrates his points with stories, whether the subject is his daughters or a constituent’s layoff, and wanders into asides like “I have made that mistake many a time tonight, I know.” He draws on 26 years as an accountant to argue for a simpler tax system.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A
90 / 100 over 36 statements
Signal 78 / 100
Relevance 92 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 98 / 100
Loses points more than most for A remark off to the side of the point.2.6 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×2.6 A story that illustrates instead of making a point.2.6 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×2.6 Averaged over the 36 of 45 statements graded so far.

Statements 45

Adjournment Proceedings ·

Adjournment Proceedings

“My constituents are not getting mail from my office because of delivery problems. Our tax system is too complicated and the tax agency is failing to protect people's private information. High fuel taxes make gas and groceries too expensive. I want the government to cancel all federal fuel taxes for the rest of the year.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, over the past year, I have sent various reports and updates to households and businesses across the 35 communities of my beautiful riding. Yellowhead, this last election, has significantly changed boundaries, incorporating areas from five previous ridings. One of the mailers was a tax guide to help individuals, families and businesses to keep more of their hard-earned dollars. Many have found this mailer very helpful. However, hundreds, if not thousands, of my constituents did not receive it due to a lack of coordination between Canada Post, Elections Canada and the House of Commons printing services. I encourage those watching to visit my website and review my monthly updates, but please know that my team and I are actively working with all parties involved to resolve these delivery issues so that they receive the information they expect from their member of Parliament. People have the right to hear from their elected officials. Taxpayers are paying for the service, and it is unacceptable that my constituents are not receiving it. As the only CPA with public practice experience in the House, every day I hear from law-abiding Canadians and professional accountants. People are struggling to navigate an increasingly complex tax system. Individuals with limited Internet and those lacking computer skills are being discriminated against when dealing with CRA and their access. A recent report out of British Columbia is deeply concerning. A Canada Revenue Agency employee has been charged after allegedly compromising sensitive tax information and is now facing charges including breach of trust, identity theft and fraud following a multi-year investigation. While honest taxpayers are being burdened, cases like this raise questions. Canadians expect the CRA to protect their sensitive financial information. Instead, we see situations where bad actors within the system are able to access, misuse and abuse the data for years before being caught. Tax fairness is not just about how much people pay. It is about ensuring that the system treats everyone equally. That means going after the wrongdoers while respecting and supporting the millions of Canadians who follow the rules. In April, in response to my question regarding removal of all gas taxes, the Liberal minister said that “Albertans are looking for the government to provide solutions” and claimed that her government is “delivering”. What is true is that Albertans are looking for change. What is lacking is any proof that the government is actually delivering. Real action would mean scrapping all federal gas and diesel taxes for the rest of the year, not pausing a third of the taxes for a third of the year. That is not delivery; that is a headline. Statistics Canada has confirmed that Canada continues to have the worst food inflation in the G7. Even with the temporary pause of the excise tax, Canadians are still paying nearly 15% more at the pump than Americans, due to the higher taxes and our weaker dollar. Families feel this every day. Higher fuel costs drive up prices across the board, forcing Canadians to choose between filling their tank and filling their grocery cart. Therefore, I will ask again: If the government knows that energy costs drive everything else, why will it not remove all federal fuel taxes and deliver real relief?

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“Alberta has sent 600 billion dollars to the rest of the country over the last 50 years, which is why its wealth fund is smaller than Norway's. I am worried this plan has no clear rules. I want to know who will run it and if the Prime Minister will just use it to help his friends.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my B.C. colleague for giving us a bit of an Alberta history lesson. Part of it was almost entertaining. When I look at this, I am a little concerned. One of the issues here is that the Liberals want to compare Norway to Alberta, whereas Alberta has had, over the last 50 years, $600 billion in transfer funds go out of the province to the rest of the country. If that was actually in the Alberta heritage fund, we would probably be exceeding Norway at this time. My concern is with the lack of structure. Who is going to be in control of this? How are they going to be appointed? Is the member concerned that this is just going to be another slush fund for the Prime Minister to dictate to his buddies to invest in what the government is concerned about?

“I want to ask my colleague about Canadians investing. People are not choosing to invest their own money here. The government is just taking it from tax dollars.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it would be amusing if the truth and the reality were not so sad. I would like to get my hon. colleague’s comments on what the previous speaker said about how Canadians want to have the opportunity to invest. In this situation, does he believe people will not be voluntarily contributing money? It is the government taking from our tax dollars to do it, and that is a completely different perspective from what the Liberals are proposing.

Government Orders ·

Government Business No. 9—Changes to Standing Orders

“I want to know if my colleague agrees that oversight committees are very important. Does he agree that opposition members should have a valued role on them?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am wondering if my colleague would agree with what we heard today in some of the other speeches, which is that there is a little more importance with the oversight committees. Does he agree that there should be some priority on how opposition members are valued on those committees?

Government Orders ·

Government Orders

“I want the member to tell us what regular military members have told him about this issue outside of committee.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the hon. member talked a lot about the committee and that sort of thing. The hon. member has the role of shadow minister. Could he explain some of the interventions he has had with people outside of the committee, such as the regular forces who have come to him and the everyday experiences he has had, back and forth, with them?