“The duty to make certain content inaccessible would require faster removal action on the most serious victimizing content: child sexual exploitation material and intimate content posted without consent.”
Said 4 times by 4 Liberal members, from October 28 to October 29, in 4 wordings.
Each sitting week
- Week of October 26: 4 times
Who said it most
- Danielle Martin 1 time
- Iqwinder Gaheer 1 time
- Jake Sawatzky 1 time
- Shannon Miedema 1 time
Every time it was said
-
Danielle Martin Liberal
The duty to make certain content inaccessible would require faster removal and action on the most serious victimizing content, such as child sexual exploitation material and intimate content that is communicated or posted without consent.
-
Shannon Miedema Liberal
The duty to make certain content inaccessible would require faster removal action on the most serious victimizing content: child sexual exploitation material and intimate content posted without consent.
-
Jake Sawatzky Liberal
We have been hearing a lot about the duty to act responsibly, the duty to protect children, and the duty to make certain content inaccessible.
-
Iqwinder Gaheer Liberal
It creates three duties: a duty to act responsibly, to assess the risks on their own platforms and reduce them by design; a duty to protect children and build age-appropriate safeguards into the product itself; and a duty to make certain content inaccessible, which requires the rapid removal of child sexual exploitation material and intimate images shared without consent, including deepfakes.