Labour

During question period on labour matters, members discussed Bill C-39, which changes the Canada Labour Code to support collective bargaining. Liberals said the bill gives employers and unions more time to negotiate, earlier access to dispute-resolution help, and new tools like mediation, while preserving the right to strike and keeping government involvement as a last resort. A Liberal member asked the minister to explain how the bill protects workers’ rights, supports better bargaining outcomes, and limits government intervention to cases where it is truly needed.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Wade Chang, Burnaby Central

Liberal

Linked statement

“I want the minister to explain how this bill protects workers' rights, helps workers and employers negotiate better deals, and keeps the government from stepping in unless it truly has to.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, workers and unions in my riding have emphasized the importance of protecting workers’ rights and ensuring their voices are heard at the bargaining table. Our government shares this commitment and believes meaningful collective bargaining leads to better agreements. This is why we are giving workers and employers more time to negotiate and greater support to resolve disputes. Could the minister explain how Bill C-39 will protect workers’ rights, strengthen collective bargaining and ensure government intervention is reserved for exceptional circumstances?

Anna Gainey, Secretary of State (Children and Youth)

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill. It helps employers and unions reach agreements by giving them more time to talk and earlier help with disputes. It keeps the right to strike and makes sure the government only steps in as a last resort.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, our government believes that the best agreements are reached at the bargaining table. Bill C-39 strengthens the bargaining process by providing employers and unions with more time to negotiate, earlier access to dispute resolution tools and additional support to help the parties reach agreements before disputes escalate. At the same time, the bill preserves the fundamental right to strike while introducing important guardrails around the use of section 107, ensuring that government intervention remains exactly what it should be: rare, exceptional, transparent and a measure of last resort.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 157

  1. Oral Questions Finance 12 statements
  2. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 6 statements
  3. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Affairs 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 10 statements
  6. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 13 statements
  7. Oral Questions Natural Resources 6 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  9. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Parks Canada 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Taxation 8 statements
  13. Private Members' Business Points of Order 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  15. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 23 statements
  16. Private Members' Business Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act 7 statements
  17. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 202 statements
  18. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  19. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements