← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 90 / 100
Signal
70 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 67% Positioning 7% Procedure 17% The question 9%
Structure · 7 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 29 words with the Liberals we get higher costs, higher taxes, more spending, and more job losses. The Minister of Finance and National Revenue thinks that the Liberals have done enough. Positioning · 7 words I agree. They have done enough damage. Positioning Procedure · 13 words Just look at how they are managing the new Liberal space launch pad. Procedure Claims · 39 words A company is renting land from the provincial government for $13,500 a year.1 That company then rents it to the Liberal government for $20 million a year, 2 which is $200 million over 10 years on our children’s credit card.3 Procedure · 4 words The question is simple: Procedure The question · 9 words If it were your money, what would you do?
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×2 Procedure ×2
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 70
4 of 4 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I agree.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They have done enough damage.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Just look at how they are managing the new Liberal space launch pad.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “The question is simple:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “A company is renting land from the provincial government for $13,500 a year” A company renting land from a provincial government for a new space launch pad pays $13,500 a year for it. search 2 “rents it to the Liberal government for $20 million a year” That same company rents the land to the federal government for $20 million a year. search 3 “$200 million over 10 years” The lease arrangement costs the federal government $200 million over 10 years. search
