← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 83. The grade is held to 81, 30 above Relevance. 81 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
51 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
82 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 56% Claims 44%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 17 words training the workforce of tomorrow is the cornerstone of this government’s economic development. It is fundamental, essential. Claims · 8 words We have projects, resources and a well-trained workforce. Off point Reasoning · 15 words We have to be able to promise those workers jobs. Vague promise That begins with this training, Claims · 17 words which takes place not only in the classroom but also on the job, in the actual workplace. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×3 Off point ×2 Vague promise
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 51
5 of 6 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is fundamental, essential.” A general emphasis on workforce training’s importance, not a point about the bill’s measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have projects, resources and a well-trained workforce.” About the government’s projects and resources generally, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We have to be able to promise those workers jobs.” About promising jobs to trained workers generally, touching the bill’s training subject only in passing.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “That begins with this training,” Points to training as the starting point generally, without addressing what the bill does.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “which takes place not only in the classroom but also on the job, in the actual workplace.” About where training takes place generally, touching the bill’s workplace training subject only in passing.
Respect · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 82
1 of 6 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “to promise those workers jobs” A commitment on the speaker’s own side with no actor, measure, date or success condition named.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
