← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 100 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 73% The question 27%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 49 words the Liberal Party’s National Women’s Liberal Commission submitted a brief that is strongly opposed to Bill C‑39.1 This group is the official women’s wing of the Liberal Party of Canada.2 Among other things, they condemn the excessive and permanent powers that weaken environmental protections and consultations with indigenous peoples.3 The question · 18 words Will the Prime Minister listen to them, or will he claim that he alone makes all the decisions?
At a glance
Nothing lost points.
Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
Nothing lost points on Signal.
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
Nothing lost points on Respect.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
Nothing lost points on Clarity.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the Liberal Party’s National Women’s Liberal Commission submitted a brief that is strongly opposed to Bill C‑39” The Liberal Party’s National Women’s Liberal Commission submitted a brief strongly opposed to Bill C-39. search 2 “This group is the official women’s wing of the Liberal Party of Canada” The National Women’s Liberal Commission is the official women’s wing of the Liberal Party of Canada. search 3 “they condemn the excessive and permanent powers that weaken environmental protections and consultations with indigenous peoples” In the brief, the National Women’s Liberal Commission condemned powers in Bill C-39 that it said weaken environmental protections and consultations with indigenous peoples. search
